预测希腊早产儿需要治疗的早产儿视网膜病变风险。DIGIROP 预后模型的外部验证。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Acta Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1111/aos.16788
Stella Moutzouri, Aldina Pivodic, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Aikaterini K Seliniotaki, Maria Lithoxopoulou, Christos Tsakalidis, Ann Hellström, Nikolaos Ziakas, Asimina Mataftsi
{"title":"预测希腊早产儿需要治疗的早产儿视网膜病变风险。DIGIROP 预后模型的外部验证。","authors":"Stella Moutzouri, Aldina Pivodic, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Aikaterini K Seliniotaki, Maria Lithoxopoulou, Christos Tsakalidis, Ann Hellström, Nikolaos Ziakas, Asimina Mataftsi","doi":"10.1111/aos.16788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the predictive performance of DIGIROP-v1.0 models in identifying treatment-requiring ROP among infants undergoing ROP screening at a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Greece.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis of 640 consecutive screened preterm infants with gestational age (GA) 24<sup>0/7</sup> to 30<sup>6/7</sup> weeks and known ROP outcome in the 2nd Neonatology Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (2009-2021). The primary outcome was the development of type 1 ROP according to the Early Treatment of ROP criteria or treatment based on the ophthalmologist's judgement. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and calibration plots for the DIGIROP-v1.0 models were displayed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DIGIROP-Birth-v1.0 model correctly identified 35/43 treated infants (sensitivity 81.4% [95% CI, 66.6%-91.6%], specificity 61.5% [95% CI, 57.4%-65.4%], AUC 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.90]). During the postnatal weeks 6-14 the sensitivity of the DIGIROP-Screen-v1.0 model ranged from 82.6% to 100%. Eleven infants, all with severe comorbidities, that is, congenital malformation(s), syndrome(s), hydrocephalus or history of intestinal surgery, that were treated, were missed by the model, but met criteria for screening according to DIGIROP-v1.0 models' recommendations, and to our unit's routine standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DIGIROP-v1.0 models resulted in lower sensitivity and higher specificity in this Greek cohort compared with the Swedish development group. Despite higher GA and BW, infants in our cohort had higher incidence of treated ROP than in Sweden, resulting in an under-estimation of their risk for treatment-requiring ROP. Further validation of the DIGIROP-v2.0 models and potential adjusting are recommended to maximize generalizability in populations with different characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting the risk of treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants in Greece. External validation of DIGIROP prognostic models.\",\"authors\":\"Stella Moutzouri, Aldina Pivodic, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Aikaterini K Seliniotaki, Maria Lithoxopoulou, Christos Tsakalidis, Ann Hellström, Nikolaos Ziakas, Asimina Mataftsi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aos.16788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the predictive performance of DIGIROP-v1.0 models in identifying treatment-requiring ROP among infants undergoing ROP screening at a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Greece.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis of 640 consecutive screened preterm infants with gestational age (GA) 24<sup>0/7</sup> to 30<sup>6/7</sup> weeks and known ROP outcome in the 2nd Neonatology Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (2009-2021). The primary outcome was the development of type 1 ROP according to the Early Treatment of ROP criteria or treatment based on the ophthalmologist's judgement. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and calibration plots for the DIGIROP-v1.0 models were displayed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DIGIROP-Birth-v1.0 model correctly identified 35/43 treated infants (sensitivity 81.4% [95% CI, 66.6%-91.6%], specificity 61.5% [95% CI, 57.4%-65.4%], AUC 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.90]). During the postnatal weeks 6-14 the sensitivity of the DIGIROP-Screen-v1.0 model ranged from 82.6% to 100%. Eleven infants, all with severe comorbidities, that is, congenital malformation(s), syndrome(s), hydrocephalus or history of intestinal surgery, that were treated, were missed by the model, but met criteria for screening according to DIGIROP-v1.0 models' recommendations, and to our unit's routine standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DIGIROP-v1.0 models resulted in lower sensitivity and higher specificity in this Greek cohort compared with the Swedish development group. Despite higher GA and BW, infants in our cohort had higher incidence of treated ROP than in Sweden, resulting in an under-estimation of their risk for treatment-requiring ROP. Further validation of the DIGIROP-v2.0 models and potential adjusting are recommended to maximize generalizability in populations with different characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16788\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估 DIGIROP-v1.0 模型在希腊一家三级新生儿重症监护病房接受 ROP 筛查的婴儿中识别需要治疗的 ROP 的预测性能:对塞萨洛尼基亚里士多德大学(Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)第二新生儿科(2nd Neonatology Department of Thessaloniki)连续筛查的640名胎龄(GA)为240/7周至306/7周且已知ROP结果的早产儿进行回顾性队列分析(2009-2021年)。主要结果是根据《ROP 早期治疗标准》出现 1 型 ROP 或根据眼科医生的判断进行治疗。结果显示了DIGIROP-v1.0模型的灵敏度、特异性、曲线下面积(AUC)及相应的95%置信区间(CI)和校准图:DIGIROP-Birth-v1.0模型正确识别了35/43名接受治疗的婴儿(灵敏度81.4% [95% CI, 66.6%-91.6%], 特异性61.5% [95% CI, 57.4%-65.4%], AUC 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.90])。在出生后第 6-14 周,DIGIROP-Screen-v1.0 模型的灵敏度在 82.6% 到 100% 之间。该模型漏检了 11 名婴儿,这些婴儿均有严重的合并症,即先天性畸形、综合征、脑积水或肠道手术史,并已接受治疗,但根据 DIGIROP-v1.0 模型的建议和我们单位的常规标准,这些婴儿符合筛查标准:结论:与瑞典发展组相比,DIGIROP-v1.0 模型在希腊队列中的灵敏度较低,特异性较高。尽管 GA 和 BW 值较高,但与瑞典相比,我们队列中的婴儿接受过治疗的 ROP 发生率更高,导致低估了他们需要接受治疗的 ROP 风险。建议进一步验证 DIGIROP-v2.0 模型并进行可能的调整,以便在具有不同特征的人群中最大限度地提高普适性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting the risk of treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants in Greece. External validation of DIGIROP prognostic models.

Purpose: To assess the predictive performance of DIGIROP-v1.0 models in identifying treatment-requiring ROP among infants undergoing ROP screening at a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Greece.

Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of 640 consecutive screened preterm infants with gestational age (GA) 240/7 to 306/7 weeks and known ROP outcome in the 2nd Neonatology Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (2009-2021). The primary outcome was the development of type 1 ROP according to the Early Treatment of ROP criteria or treatment based on the ophthalmologist's judgement. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and calibration plots for the DIGIROP-v1.0 models were displayed.

Results: The DIGIROP-Birth-v1.0 model correctly identified 35/43 treated infants (sensitivity 81.4% [95% CI, 66.6%-91.6%], specificity 61.5% [95% CI, 57.4%-65.4%], AUC 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.90]). During the postnatal weeks 6-14 the sensitivity of the DIGIROP-Screen-v1.0 model ranged from 82.6% to 100%. Eleven infants, all with severe comorbidities, that is, congenital malformation(s), syndrome(s), hydrocephalus or history of intestinal surgery, that were treated, were missed by the model, but met criteria for screening according to DIGIROP-v1.0 models' recommendations, and to our unit's routine standards.

Conclusion: The DIGIROP-v1.0 models resulted in lower sensitivity and higher specificity in this Greek cohort compared with the Swedish development group. Despite higher GA and BW, infants in our cohort had higher incidence of treated ROP than in Sweden, resulting in an under-estimation of their risk for treatment-requiring ROP. Further validation of the DIGIROP-v2.0 models and potential adjusting are recommended to maximize generalizability in populations with different characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of AI-based retinal fluid monitoring in neovascular age-related macular degeneration with manual assessment by different eye care professionals under optimized conditions. Prototype master protocol for benchmarking of real-world follow-up data in glaucoma. Issue Information In this Issue Can the choice of artificial tears harm patients? A narrative review with an overview of the Nordic market.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1