Stella Moutzouri, Aldina Pivodic, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Aikaterini K Seliniotaki, Maria Lithoxopoulou, Christos Tsakalidis, Ann Hellström, Nikolaos Ziakas, Asimina Mataftsi
{"title":"预测希腊早产儿需要治疗的早产儿视网膜病变风险。DIGIROP 预后模型的外部验证。","authors":"Stella Moutzouri, Aldina Pivodic, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Aikaterini K Seliniotaki, Maria Lithoxopoulou, Christos Tsakalidis, Ann Hellström, Nikolaos Ziakas, Asimina Mataftsi","doi":"10.1111/aos.16788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the predictive performance of DIGIROP-v1.0 models in identifying treatment-requiring ROP among infants undergoing ROP screening at a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Greece.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis of 640 consecutive screened preterm infants with gestational age (GA) 24<sup>0/7</sup> to 30<sup>6/7</sup> weeks and known ROP outcome in the 2nd Neonatology Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (2009-2021). The primary outcome was the development of type 1 ROP according to the Early Treatment of ROP criteria or treatment based on the ophthalmologist's judgement. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and calibration plots for the DIGIROP-v1.0 models were displayed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DIGIROP-Birth-v1.0 model correctly identified 35/43 treated infants (sensitivity 81.4% [95% CI, 66.6%-91.6%], specificity 61.5% [95% CI, 57.4%-65.4%], AUC 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.90]). During the postnatal weeks 6-14 the sensitivity of the DIGIROP-Screen-v1.0 model ranged from 82.6% to 100%. Eleven infants, all with severe comorbidities, that is, congenital malformation(s), syndrome(s), hydrocephalus or history of intestinal surgery, that were treated, were missed by the model, but met criteria for screening according to DIGIROP-v1.0 models' recommendations, and to our unit's routine standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DIGIROP-v1.0 models resulted in lower sensitivity and higher specificity in this Greek cohort compared with the Swedish development group. Despite higher GA and BW, infants in our cohort had higher incidence of treated ROP than in Sweden, resulting in an under-estimation of their risk for treatment-requiring ROP. Further validation of the DIGIROP-v2.0 models and potential adjusting are recommended to maximize generalizability in populations with different characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting the risk of treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants in Greece. External validation of DIGIROP prognostic models.\",\"authors\":\"Stella Moutzouri, Aldina Pivodic, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Aikaterini K Seliniotaki, Maria Lithoxopoulou, Christos Tsakalidis, Ann Hellström, Nikolaos Ziakas, Asimina Mataftsi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aos.16788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the predictive performance of DIGIROP-v1.0 models in identifying treatment-requiring ROP among infants undergoing ROP screening at a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Greece.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis of 640 consecutive screened preterm infants with gestational age (GA) 24<sup>0/7</sup> to 30<sup>6/7</sup> weeks and known ROP outcome in the 2nd Neonatology Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (2009-2021). The primary outcome was the development of type 1 ROP according to the Early Treatment of ROP criteria or treatment based on the ophthalmologist's judgement. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and calibration plots for the DIGIROP-v1.0 models were displayed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DIGIROP-Birth-v1.0 model correctly identified 35/43 treated infants (sensitivity 81.4% [95% CI, 66.6%-91.6%], specificity 61.5% [95% CI, 57.4%-65.4%], AUC 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.90]). During the postnatal weeks 6-14 the sensitivity of the DIGIROP-Screen-v1.0 model ranged from 82.6% to 100%. Eleven infants, all with severe comorbidities, that is, congenital malformation(s), syndrome(s), hydrocephalus or history of intestinal surgery, that were treated, were missed by the model, but met criteria for screening according to DIGIROP-v1.0 models' recommendations, and to our unit's routine standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DIGIROP-v1.0 models resulted in lower sensitivity and higher specificity in this Greek cohort compared with the Swedish development group. Despite higher GA and BW, infants in our cohort had higher incidence of treated ROP than in Sweden, resulting in an under-estimation of their risk for treatment-requiring ROP. Further validation of the DIGIROP-v2.0 models and potential adjusting are recommended to maximize generalizability in populations with different characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16788\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting the risk of treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants in Greece. External validation of DIGIROP prognostic models.
Purpose: To assess the predictive performance of DIGIROP-v1.0 models in identifying treatment-requiring ROP among infants undergoing ROP screening at a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Greece.
Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of 640 consecutive screened preterm infants with gestational age (GA) 240/7 to 306/7 weeks and known ROP outcome in the 2nd Neonatology Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (2009-2021). The primary outcome was the development of type 1 ROP according to the Early Treatment of ROP criteria or treatment based on the ophthalmologist's judgement. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and calibration plots for the DIGIROP-v1.0 models were displayed.
Results: The DIGIROP-Birth-v1.0 model correctly identified 35/43 treated infants (sensitivity 81.4% [95% CI, 66.6%-91.6%], specificity 61.5% [95% CI, 57.4%-65.4%], AUC 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.90]). During the postnatal weeks 6-14 the sensitivity of the DIGIROP-Screen-v1.0 model ranged from 82.6% to 100%. Eleven infants, all with severe comorbidities, that is, congenital malformation(s), syndrome(s), hydrocephalus or history of intestinal surgery, that were treated, were missed by the model, but met criteria for screening according to DIGIROP-v1.0 models' recommendations, and to our unit's routine standards.
Conclusion: The DIGIROP-v1.0 models resulted in lower sensitivity and higher specificity in this Greek cohort compared with the Swedish development group. Despite higher GA and BW, infants in our cohort had higher incidence of treated ROP than in Sweden, resulting in an under-estimation of their risk for treatment-requiring ROP. Further validation of the DIGIROP-v2.0 models and potential adjusting are recommended to maximize generalizability in populations with different characteristics.
期刊介绍:
Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER).
Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.