Danish Hassan Dani, Syed Baqir Shyum Naqvi, Muhammad Akram, Matti Ullah, Sheikh Abdul Khaliq, Muhammad Masoom Akhtar, Orva Abdullah, Syed Faisal Badshah, Mohammed Bourhia, Gamal A Shazly, Yousef A Bin Jardan, Srosh Fazil
{"title":"新型多层稳定泡腾片的药代动力学特征:与欧洲知名品牌在健康年轻男性成年人中进行的交叉研究。","authors":"Danish Hassan Dani, Syed Baqir Shyum Naqvi, Muhammad Akram, Matti Ullah, Sheikh Abdul Khaliq, Muhammad Masoom Akhtar, Orva Abdullah, Syed Faisal Badshah, Mohammed Bourhia, Gamal A Shazly, Yousef A Bin Jardan, Srosh Fazil","doi":"10.1186/s40360-024-00808-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effervescent formulation helps in faster and better absorption of drugs, especially those that are rapidly soluble in water. However, these tablets require special packaging in order to prevent them from absorbing moisture, hence increasing cost. We compared an effervescent tablet prepared using an in-house developed method (multi-layer tablet with acid and base part separated by an inert layer) to a European effervescent tablet (Efferalgan®) in a single-center, randomized cross-over study among twelve healthy volunteers. Blood samples were collected for 8 h and analyzed for paracetamol concentration using HPLC. Our results showed that both the products have similar pharmacokinetic profiles with no significant difference observed for C<sub>last</sub>, T<sub>half</sub>, K<sub>elim</sub>, and MRT (p-value > 0.05). Moreover, to assess bioequivalence we did not find any significant difference (p-value > 0.05) in AUC (27.12 ± 6.02 vs. 27.29 ± 2.64 µg.h/ml), C<sub>max</sub> (7.42 ± 1.06 vs. 7.83 ± 1.19 µg/ml) and t<sub>max</sub> (0.85 ± 0.22 vs. 0.83 ± 0.25 h). The TR ratios for AUC, C<sub>max</sub>, and t<sub>max</sub> were 0.99, 0.95, and 1.02 respectively, and were all within the specified FDA limits i.e., 0.8-1.25. We found our test tablet to be bioequivalent to that of Efferalgan®.</p>","PeriodicalId":9023,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetic profile of novel multi-layer stable effervescent tablet: a cross-over study with an established European brand in healthy young male adults.\",\"authors\":\"Danish Hassan Dani, Syed Baqir Shyum Naqvi, Muhammad Akram, Matti Ullah, Sheikh Abdul Khaliq, Muhammad Masoom Akhtar, Orva Abdullah, Syed Faisal Badshah, Mohammed Bourhia, Gamal A Shazly, Yousef A Bin Jardan, Srosh Fazil\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40360-024-00808-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Effervescent formulation helps in faster and better absorption of drugs, especially those that are rapidly soluble in water. However, these tablets require special packaging in order to prevent them from absorbing moisture, hence increasing cost. We compared an effervescent tablet prepared using an in-house developed method (multi-layer tablet with acid and base part separated by an inert layer) to a European effervescent tablet (Efferalgan®) in a single-center, randomized cross-over study among twelve healthy volunteers. Blood samples were collected for 8 h and analyzed for paracetamol concentration using HPLC. Our results showed that both the products have similar pharmacokinetic profiles with no significant difference observed for C<sub>last</sub>, T<sub>half</sub>, K<sub>elim</sub>, and MRT (p-value > 0.05). Moreover, to assess bioequivalence we did not find any significant difference (p-value > 0.05) in AUC (27.12 ± 6.02 vs. 27.29 ± 2.64 µg.h/ml), C<sub>max</sub> (7.42 ± 1.06 vs. 7.83 ± 1.19 µg/ml) and t<sub>max</sub> (0.85 ± 0.22 vs. 0.83 ± 0.25 h). The TR ratios for AUC, C<sub>max</sub>, and t<sub>max</sub> were 0.99, 0.95, and 1.02 respectively, and were all within the specified FDA limits i.e., 0.8-1.25. We found our test tablet to be bioequivalent to that of Efferalgan®.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536717/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-024-00808-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-024-00808-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pharmacokinetic profile of novel multi-layer stable effervescent tablet: a cross-over study with an established European brand in healthy young male adults.
Effervescent formulation helps in faster and better absorption of drugs, especially those that are rapidly soluble in water. However, these tablets require special packaging in order to prevent them from absorbing moisture, hence increasing cost. We compared an effervescent tablet prepared using an in-house developed method (multi-layer tablet with acid and base part separated by an inert layer) to a European effervescent tablet (Efferalgan®) in a single-center, randomized cross-over study among twelve healthy volunteers. Blood samples were collected for 8 h and analyzed for paracetamol concentration using HPLC. Our results showed that both the products have similar pharmacokinetic profiles with no significant difference observed for Clast, Thalf, Kelim, and MRT (p-value > 0.05). Moreover, to assess bioequivalence we did not find any significant difference (p-value > 0.05) in AUC (27.12 ± 6.02 vs. 27.29 ± 2.64 µg.h/ml), Cmax (7.42 ± 1.06 vs. 7.83 ± 1.19 µg/ml) and tmax (0.85 ± 0.22 vs. 0.83 ± 0.25 h). The TR ratios for AUC, Cmax, and tmax were 0.99, 0.95, and 1.02 respectively, and were all within the specified FDA limits i.e., 0.8-1.25. We found our test tablet to be bioequivalent to that of Efferalgan®.
期刊介绍:
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of chemically defined therapeutic and toxic agents. The journal welcomes submissions from all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology including clinical trials and toxicology.