四种营养指数对高血压患者不良后果的预测价值。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1007/s10157-024-02586-4
Hiroki Ejiri, Kenichi Tanaka, Hiroshi Kimura, Hirotaka Saito, Michio Shimabukuro, Koichi Asahi, Tsuyoshi Watanabe, Junichiro James Kazama
{"title":"四种营养指数对高血压患者不良后果的预测价值。","authors":"Hiroki Ejiri, Kenichi Tanaka, Hiroshi Kimura, Hirotaka Saito, Michio Shimabukuro, Koichi Asahi, Tsuyoshi Watanabe, Junichiro James Kazama","doi":"10.1007/s10157-024-02586-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malnutrition, evaluated by nutritional indices, is reportedly related to a poor prognosis in patients with hypertension. However, clinical evidence on which index is more suitable for predicting a kidney prognosis is limited, and it has not been evaluated in hypertension. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the predictive values of four nutritional indices: Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI); Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI); Triglycerides × Total cholesterol × Body weight Index (TCBI); and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cohort study of 1255 hypertensive patients under care in the Fukushima Cohort Study was conducted. The primary outcome was kidney events, defined as a combination of a 50% decline in eGFR from baseline and renal failure requiring dialysis therapy or kidney transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between the four nutritional indices and kidney events. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver-operating characteristic curves were also examined to compare the predictive values of these nutritional indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower GNRI, lower PNI, and higher CONUT score were significantly related to a higher risk of kidney events. GNRI (AUC = 0.729, 95% confidence interval 0.681-0.777) and PNI (AUC = 0.710, 95% confidence interval 0.665-0.756) had significantly higher AUCs for kidney events than the TCBI and CONUT score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GNRI and PNI showed greater predictive values for kidney events than other nutritional indices in patients with hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive values of four nutritional indices for adverse outcomes in patients with hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Ejiri, Kenichi Tanaka, Hiroshi Kimura, Hirotaka Saito, Michio Shimabukuro, Koichi Asahi, Tsuyoshi Watanabe, Junichiro James Kazama\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10157-024-02586-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malnutrition, evaluated by nutritional indices, is reportedly related to a poor prognosis in patients with hypertension. However, clinical evidence on which index is more suitable for predicting a kidney prognosis is limited, and it has not been evaluated in hypertension. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the predictive values of four nutritional indices: Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI); Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI); Triglycerides × Total cholesterol × Body weight Index (TCBI); and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cohort study of 1255 hypertensive patients under care in the Fukushima Cohort Study was conducted. The primary outcome was kidney events, defined as a combination of a 50% decline in eGFR from baseline and renal failure requiring dialysis therapy or kidney transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between the four nutritional indices and kidney events. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver-operating characteristic curves were also examined to compare the predictive values of these nutritional indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower GNRI, lower PNI, and higher CONUT score were significantly related to a higher risk of kidney events. GNRI (AUC = 0.729, 95% confidence interval 0.681-0.777) and PNI (AUC = 0.710, 95% confidence interval 0.665-0.756) had significantly higher AUCs for kidney events than the TCBI and CONUT score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GNRI and PNI showed greater predictive values for kidney events than other nutritional indices in patients with hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02586-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02586-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据报道,通过营养指数评估的营养不良与高血压患者的不良预后有关。然而,关于哪种指数更适合预测肾脏预后的临床证据有限,而且尚未对高血压进行评估。本研究旨在调查和比较四种营养指数的预测价值:老年营养风险指数(GNRI)、预后营养指数(PNI)、甘油三酯 × 总胆固醇 × 体重指数(TCBI)和控制营养状况(CONUT)评分:对福岛队列研究中接受治疗的 1255 名高血压患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。主要结果是肾脏事件,即 eGFR 从基线下降 50%,以及肾功能衰竭需要透析治疗或肾移植。研究人员进行了卡普兰-梅耶分析和多变量考克斯回归分析,以研究四种营养指标与肾脏事件之间的关系。此外,还研究了接受者操作特征曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)值,以比较这些营养指数的预测价值:结果:较低的 GNRI、较低的 PNI 和较高的 CONUT 评分与较高的肾脏事件风险显著相关。与 TCBI 和 CONUT 评分相比,GNRI(AUC = 0.729,95% 置信区间 0.681-0.777)和 PNI(AUC = 0.710,95% 置信区间 0.665-0.756)的肾脏事件 AUC 明显更高:结论:与其他营养指数相比,GNRI 和 PNI 对高血压患者肾脏事件的预测价值更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive values of four nutritional indices for adverse outcomes in patients with hypertension.

Background: Malnutrition, evaluated by nutritional indices, is reportedly related to a poor prognosis in patients with hypertension. However, clinical evidence on which index is more suitable for predicting a kidney prognosis is limited, and it has not been evaluated in hypertension. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the predictive values of four nutritional indices: Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI); Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI); Triglycerides × Total cholesterol × Body weight Index (TCBI); and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score.

Methods: A retrospective, cohort study of 1255 hypertensive patients under care in the Fukushima Cohort Study was conducted. The primary outcome was kidney events, defined as a combination of a 50% decline in eGFR from baseline and renal failure requiring dialysis therapy or kidney transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between the four nutritional indices and kidney events. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver-operating characteristic curves were also examined to compare the predictive values of these nutritional indices.

Results: Lower GNRI, lower PNI, and higher CONUT score were significantly related to a higher risk of kidney events. GNRI (AUC = 0.729, 95% confidence interval 0.681-0.777) and PNI (AUC = 0.710, 95% confidence interval 0.665-0.756) had significantly higher AUCs for kidney events than the TCBI and CONUT score.

Conclusions: GNRI and PNI showed greater predictive values for kidney events than other nutritional indices in patients with hypertension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for surgery in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction due to antenatally detected ınfantil hydronephrosis. Comparison of the incidence of proteinuria and changes in eGFR among febuxostat and topiroxostat users. Longitudinal impact of extended-hours hemodialysis with a liberalized diet on nutritional status and survival outcomes: findings from the LIBERTY cohort. Exploring factors associated with Kidney Disease Quality of Life in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: the Reach-J CKD cohort study. Correction: Adolescents and parents' knowledge of chronic kidney disease: the potential of school-based education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1