{"title":"四种营养指数对高血压患者不良后果的预测价值。","authors":"Hiroki Ejiri, Kenichi Tanaka, Hiroshi Kimura, Hirotaka Saito, Michio Shimabukuro, Koichi Asahi, Tsuyoshi Watanabe, Junichiro James Kazama","doi":"10.1007/s10157-024-02586-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malnutrition, evaluated by nutritional indices, is reportedly related to a poor prognosis in patients with hypertension. However, clinical evidence on which index is more suitable for predicting a kidney prognosis is limited, and it has not been evaluated in hypertension. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the predictive values of four nutritional indices: Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI); Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI); Triglycerides × Total cholesterol × Body weight Index (TCBI); and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cohort study of 1255 hypertensive patients under care in the Fukushima Cohort Study was conducted. The primary outcome was kidney events, defined as a combination of a 50% decline in eGFR from baseline and renal failure requiring dialysis therapy or kidney transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between the four nutritional indices and kidney events. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver-operating characteristic curves were also examined to compare the predictive values of these nutritional indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower GNRI, lower PNI, and higher CONUT score were significantly related to a higher risk of kidney events. GNRI (AUC = 0.729, 95% confidence interval 0.681-0.777) and PNI (AUC = 0.710, 95% confidence interval 0.665-0.756) had significantly higher AUCs for kidney events than the TCBI and CONUT score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GNRI and PNI showed greater predictive values for kidney events than other nutritional indices in patients with hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive values of four nutritional indices for adverse outcomes in patients with hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Ejiri, Kenichi Tanaka, Hiroshi Kimura, Hirotaka Saito, Michio Shimabukuro, Koichi Asahi, Tsuyoshi Watanabe, Junichiro James Kazama\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10157-024-02586-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malnutrition, evaluated by nutritional indices, is reportedly related to a poor prognosis in patients with hypertension. However, clinical evidence on which index is more suitable for predicting a kidney prognosis is limited, and it has not been evaluated in hypertension. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the predictive values of four nutritional indices: Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI); Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI); Triglycerides × Total cholesterol × Body weight Index (TCBI); and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cohort study of 1255 hypertensive patients under care in the Fukushima Cohort Study was conducted. The primary outcome was kidney events, defined as a combination of a 50% decline in eGFR from baseline and renal failure requiring dialysis therapy or kidney transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between the four nutritional indices and kidney events. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver-operating characteristic curves were also examined to compare the predictive values of these nutritional indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower GNRI, lower PNI, and higher CONUT score were significantly related to a higher risk of kidney events. GNRI (AUC = 0.729, 95% confidence interval 0.681-0.777) and PNI (AUC = 0.710, 95% confidence interval 0.665-0.756) had significantly higher AUCs for kidney events than the TCBI and CONUT score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GNRI and PNI showed greater predictive values for kidney events than other nutritional indices in patients with hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02586-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02586-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictive values of four nutritional indices for adverse outcomes in patients with hypertension.
Background: Malnutrition, evaluated by nutritional indices, is reportedly related to a poor prognosis in patients with hypertension. However, clinical evidence on which index is more suitable for predicting a kidney prognosis is limited, and it has not been evaluated in hypertension. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the predictive values of four nutritional indices: Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI); Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI); Triglycerides × Total cholesterol × Body weight Index (TCBI); and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score.
Methods: A retrospective, cohort study of 1255 hypertensive patients under care in the Fukushima Cohort Study was conducted. The primary outcome was kidney events, defined as a combination of a 50% decline in eGFR from baseline and renal failure requiring dialysis therapy or kidney transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between the four nutritional indices and kidney events. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver-operating characteristic curves were also examined to compare the predictive values of these nutritional indices.
Results: Lower GNRI, lower PNI, and higher CONUT score were significantly related to a higher risk of kidney events. GNRI (AUC = 0.729, 95% confidence interval 0.681-0.777) and PNI (AUC = 0.710, 95% confidence interval 0.665-0.756) had significantly higher AUCs for kidney events than the TCBI and CONUT score.
Conclusions: GNRI and PNI showed greater predictive values for kidney events than other nutritional indices in patients with hypertension.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.