平衡青少年和年轻成人乳腺癌患者(新)辅助治疗中的生育力保护和治疗效果:叙述性综述。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Current Oncology Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1007/s11912-024-01615-5
Yuji Tanaka, Tsukuru Amano, Akiko Nakamura, Akimasa Takahashi, Akie Takebayashi, Tetsuro Hanada, Shunichiro Tsuji, Takashi Murakami
{"title":"平衡青少年和年轻成人乳腺癌患者(新)辅助治疗中的生育力保护和治疗效果:叙述性综述。","authors":"Yuji Tanaka, Tsukuru Amano, Akiko Nakamura, Akimasa Takahashi, Akie Takebayashi, Tetsuro Hanada, Shunichiro Tsuji, Takashi Murakami","doi":"10.1007/s11912-024-01615-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Adolescent and young adult (AYA) breast cancer survivors face a significant risk of infertility due to the gonadotoxic effects of (neo)adjuvant therapy, which complicates their ability to conceive post-treatment. While (neo)adjuvant therapy primarily aims to improve recurrence-free and overall survival, fertility preservation strategies should also be considered for young patients. This narrative review explores recent advancements in fertility preservation techniques, such as oocyte, embryo, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and evaluates the feasibility of modifying breast cancer (neo)adjuvant therapy to preserve fertility without compromising survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Our review highlights that clinical trials with co-primary endpoints of oncological safety and fertility preservation are limited, and substituting standard treatment regimens solely for fertility preservation is currently not recommended. Nevertheless, new clinical studies have emerged that either exclude highly ovarian-toxic agents, such as cyclophosphamide, or omit adjuvant therapy altogether, even if fertility preservation is not their primary endpoint. Unfortunately, many of these trials have not evaluated ovarian toxicity. Notably, since 2020, major oncology organizations, including the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) have advocated for the routine assessment of ovarian toxicity in all clinical trials. The review underscores the importance of incorporating ovarian toxicity as a standard endpoint in future trials involving premenopausal breast cancer patients to identify treatment regimens that can effectively balance fertility preservation with treatment efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing Fertility Preservation and Treatment Efficacy in (Neo)adjuvant Therapy for Adolescent and Young Adult Breast Cancer Patients: a Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Yuji Tanaka, Tsukuru Amano, Akiko Nakamura, Akimasa Takahashi, Akie Takebayashi, Tetsuro Hanada, Shunichiro Tsuji, Takashi Murakami\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11912-024-01615-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Adolescent and young adult (AYA) breast cancer survivors face a significant risk of infertility due to the gonadotoxic effects of (neo)adjuvant therapy, which complicates their ability to conceive post-treatment. While (neo)adjuvant therapy primarily aims to improve recurrence-free and overall survival, fertility preservation strategies should also be considered for young patients. This narrative review explores recent advancements in fertility preservation techniques, such as oocyte, embryo, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and evaluates the feasibility of modifying breast cancer (neo)adjuvant therapy to preserve fertility without compromising survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Our review highlights that clinical trials with co-primary endpoints of oncological safety and fertility preservation are limited, and substituting standard treatment regimens solely for fertility preservation is currently not recommended. Nevertheless, new clinical studies have emerged that either exclude highly ovarian-toxic agents, such as cyclophosphamide, or omit adjuvant therapy altogether, even if fertility preservation is not their primary endpoint. Unfortunately, many of these trials have not evaluated ovarian toxicity. Notably, since 2020, major oncology organizations, including the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) have advocated for the routine assessment of ovarian toxicity in all clinical trials. The review underscores the importance of incorporating ovarian toxicity as a standard endpoint in future trials involving premenopausal breast cancer patients to identify treatment regimens that can effectively balance fertility preservation with treatment efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Oncology Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Oncology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-024-01615-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-024-01615-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:青少年和年轻成人乳腺癌幸存者由于(新)辅助治疗的性腺毒性影响而面临不孕的巨大风险,这使他们治疗后的受孕能力变得复杂。虽然(新)辅助治疗的主要目的是提高无复发率和总生存率,但年轻患者也应考虑生育力保护策略。这篇叙述性综述探讨了卵母细胞、胚胎和卵巢组织冷冻保存等生育力保存技术的最新进展,并评估了修改乳腺癌(新)辅助治疗以保存生育力而不影响生存结果的可行性:我们的综述强调,以肿瘤安全性和保留生育力为共同主要终点的临床试验非常有限,目前不建议仅以保留生育力来替代标准治疗方案。尽管如此,新的临床研究已经出现,这些研究或排除了环磷酰胺等卵巢毒性高的药物,或完全省略了辅助治疗,即使保留生育力不是其主要终点。遗憾的是,其中许多试验并未评估卵巢毒性。值得注意的是,自 2020 年以来,包括美国临床肿瘤学会 (ASCO) 和欧洲肿瘤内科学会 (ESMO) 在内的主要肿瘤组织都主张在所有临床试验中对卵巢毒性进行常规评估。该综述强调了在未来涉及绝经前乳腺癌患者的试验中将卵巢毒性作为标准终点的重要性,以确定能有效平衡生育力保护与治疗效果的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Balancing Fertility Preservation and Treatment Efficacy in (Neo)adjuvant Therapy for Adolescent and Young Adult Breast Cancer Patients: a Narrative Review.

Purpose of review: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) breast cancer survivors face a significant risk of infertility due to the gonadotoxic effects of (neo)adjuvant therapy, which complicates their ability to conceive post-treatment. While (neo)adjuvant therapy primarily aims to improve recurrence-free and overall survival, fertility preservation strategies should also be considered for young patients. This narrative review explores recent advancements in fertility preservation techniques, such as oocyte, embryo, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and evaluates the feasibility of modifying breast cancer (neo)adjuvant therapy to preserve fertility without compromising survival outcomes.

Recent findings: Our review highlights that clinical trials with co-primary endpoints of oncological safety and fertility preservation are limited, and substituting standard treatment regimens solely for fertility preservation is currently not recommended. Nevertheless, new clinical studies have emerged that either exclude highly ovarian-toxic agents, such as cyclophosphamide, or omit adjuvant therapy altogether, even if fertility preservation is not their primary endpoint. Unfortunately, many of these trials have not evaluated ovarian toxicity. Notably, since 2020, major oncology organizations, including the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) have advocated for the routine assessment of ovarian toxicity in all clinical trials. The review underscores the importance of incorporating ovarian toxicity as a standard endpoint in future trials involving premenopausal breast cancer patients to identify treatment regimens that can effectively balance fertility preservation with treatment efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings in the field of oncology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those affected by cancer. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as cancer prevention, leukemia, melanoma, neuro-oncology, and palliative medicine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
期刊最新文献
Tivozanib Monotherapy in the Frontline Setting for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Favorable Prognosis. Immunotherapeutic and Targeted Strategies for Managing Brain Metastases from Common Cancer Origins: A State-of-the-Art Review. Current Standards and Controversies in Multidisciplinary Management of Locoregional Gastroesophageal Junction Tumors. Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: A Narrative Review of Current Knowledge and Advancements. Telemedicine and Virtual Interventions in Cancer Rehabilitation: Practical Application, Complications and Future Potentials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1