Samin Mortaheb, Parmida Sadat Pezeshki, Nima Rezaei
{"title":"双特异性疗法:关于免疫检查点抑制与成本刺激和非检查点靶向疗法相结合的最新综述。","authors":"Samin Mortaheb, Parmida Sadat Pezeshki, Nima Rezaei","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2426636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the field of cancer immunotherapy and have enhanced the survival of patients with malignant tumors. However, the overall efficacy of ICIs remains unsatisfactory and is faced with two major concerns of resistance development and occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have emerged as promising strategies with unique mechanisms of action to achieve a better efficacy and safety than monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or even their combination. BsAbs along with other bispecific platforms such as bispecific fusion proteins, nanobodies, and CAR-T cells may help to avoid development of resistance and reduce irAEs caused by on-target/off-tumor binding effects of mAbs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A literature search was performed using PubMed for English-language articles to provide a comprehensive overview of preclinical and clinical studies on bsAbs specified for both immune checkpoints and non-checkpoint molecules as a well-enhanced class of therapeutics.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Identifying suitable targets and selecting effective engineering platforms enhance the potential of bsAbs to address the challenges associated with conventional therapies such as ICIs, positioning them as a promising class of therapeutics in the landscape of cancer immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bispecific therapeutics: a state-of-the-art review on the combination of immune checkpoint inhibition with costimulatory and non-checkpoint targeted therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Samin Mortaheb, Parmida Sadat Pezeshki, Nima Rezaei\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14712598.2024.2426636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the field of cancer immunotherapy and have enhanced the survival of patients with malignant tumors. However, the overall efficacy of ICIs remains unsatisfactory and is faced with two major concerns of resistance development and occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have emerged as promising strategies with unique mechanisms of action to achieve a better efficacy and safety than monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or even their combination. BsAbs along with other bispecific platforms such as bispecific fusion proteins, nanobodies, and CAR-T cells may help to avoid development of resistance and reduce irAEs caused by on-target/off-tumor binding effects of mAbs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A literature search was performed using PubMed for English-language articles to provide a comprehensive overview of preclinical and clinical studies on bsAbs specified for both immune checkpoints and non-checkpoint molecules as a well-enhanced class of therapeutics.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Identifying suitable targets and selecting effective engineering platforms enhance the potential of bsAbs to address the challenges associated with conventional therapies such as ICIs, positioning them as a promising class of therapeutics in the landscape of cancer immunotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2024.2426636\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2024.2426636","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bispecific therapeutics: a state-of-the-art review on the combination of immune checkpoint inhibition with costimulatory and non-checkpoint targeted therapy.
Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the field of cancer immunotherapy and have enhanced the survival of patients with malignant tumors. However, the overall efficacy of ICIs remains unsatisfactory and is faced with two major concerns of resistance development and occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have emerged as promising strategies with unique mechanisms of action to achieve a better efficacy and safety than monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or even their combination. BsAbs along with other bispecific platforms such as bispecific fusion proteins, nanobodies, and CAR-T cells may help to avoid development of resistance and reduce irAEs caused by on-target/off-tumor binding effects of mAbs.
Areas covered: A literature search was performed using PubMed for English-language articles to provide a comprehensive overview of preclinical and clinical studies on bsAbs specified for both immune checkpoints and non-checkpoint molecules as a well-enhanced class of therapeutics.
Expert opinion: Identifying suitable targets and selecting effective engineering platforms enhance the potential of bsAbs to address the challenges associated with conventional therapies such as ICIs, positioning them as a promising class of therapeutics in the landscape of cancer immunotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy.
Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease.
The journal welcomes:
Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine
Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent
Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results;
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.