右下腹疼痛儿童使用造影剂的社会人口学预测因素。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1007/s00247-024-06076-3
Michael P George, Patrice Melvin, Amanda W Grice, Valerie L Ward
{"title":"右下腹疼痛儿童使用造影剂的社会人口学预测因素。","authors":"Michael P George, Patrice Melvin, Amanda W Grice, Valerie L Ward","doi":"10.1007/s00247-024-06076-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inequities in health care access lead to inequities in outcome. In recent years, health outcome disparities have been documented in children with acute appendicitis and sociodemographic predictors of imaging utilization have not been adequately assessed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of our study is to assess sociodemographic predictors for the diagnostic imaging of children with right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain. Our hypothesis is that disparities exist in imaging utilization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Our nationwide retrospective cohort study of the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database queried emergency department encounters for children aged 0-18 years presenting with RLQ pain (ICD code CM R10.31) between January 2018 and September 2023. Primary exposures included neighborhood-level sociodemographic metrics as measured by Child Opportunity Index, race/ethnicity, and insurance status. Outcomes included no diagnostic imaging, diagnostic imaging with radiography alone, ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed modality usage with respect to the primary exposures after controlling for demographic (age, gender) and additional (hospital geographic region, time of imaging) covariates. To avoid the perpetuation of bias, reference categories were determined by the lowest numerical value for each covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 100,161 patient encounters met inclusion criteria (mean patient age 11.2 years ± 3.9; 59.3%, n = 59,416 females). Imaging utilized was US (78.0%; n = 78,115), CT (16.4%, n = 16,405), no imaging (13.9%, n = 13,894), radiography alone (4.4%, n = 4,429), and MRI (3.1%, n = 3,148). The most predictive factors for no imaging were moderate, low, and very low Child Opportunity Index (aOR 1.25, 1.17, and 1.18 [95% CI 1.10-1.33] compared to very high Child Opportunity Index); Black race/ethnicity (aOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.11-1.44] compared to White or Asian race/ethnicity); and public or other insurance (aOR 1.23 and 1.32 [95% CI 1.18-1.41] compared to commercial insurance). The most predictive factors for radiography alone were Black race/ethnicity (aOR 1.30 [95% CI 1.17-1.45] compared to Hispanic race/ethnicity) and public or other insurance (aOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.11-1.44] compared to commercial). The most predictive factors for US were very-high Child Opportunity Index (aOR 1.16 [95% CI 1.09-1.22] compared to very low Child Opportunity Index); Asian, NH-White, or Hispanic race/ethnicity (aOR 1.33, 1.31, 1.30 [95% CI 1.18-1.40] compared to Black race/ethnicity); and commercial insurance (aOR 1.20 [95% CI 1.16-1.25] compared to public insurance). The most predictive factor for CT was White race/ethnicity (aOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.11-1.43] compared with Asian race/ethnicity) and the most predictive factor for MRI was Hispanic race/ethnicity (aOR 1.49 [95% CI 1.17-1.61] compared with Black race/ethnicity). The greatest predictor of cross-sectional imaging was a hospital's region, with CT most likely in southern hospitals (aOR 4.09 [95% CI 2.17-7.70] compared with northeast hospitals). Patient Child Opportunity Index did not predict the likelihood of cross-sectional imaging with CT or MRI in tertiary pediatric centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sociodemographic disparities exist in the imaging of children presenting to tertiary pediatric hospitals with RLQ pain. Future studies are needed to analyze the causes of such disparities both on hospital and departmental levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociodemographic predictors of imaging utilization in children with right lower quadrant pain.\",\"authors\":\"Michael P George, Patrice Melvin, Amanda W Grice, Valerie L Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00247-024-06076-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inequities in health care access lead to inequities in outcome. In recent years, health outcome disparities have been documented in children with acute appendicitis and sociodemographic predictors of imaging utilization have not been adequately assessed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of our study is to assess sociodemographic predictors for the diagnostic imaging of children with right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain. Our hypothesis is that disparities exist in imaging utilization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Our nationwide retrospective cohort study of the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database queried emergency department encounters for children aged 0-18 years presenting with RLQ pain (ICD code CM R10.31) between January 2018 and September 2023. Primary exposures included neighborhood-level sociodemographic metrics as measured by Child Opportunity Index, race/ethnicity, and insurance status. Outcomes included no diagnostic imaging, diagnostic imaging with radiography alone, ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed modality usage with respect to the primary exposures after controlling for demographic (age, gender) and additional (hospital geographic region, time of imaging) covariates. To avoid the perpetuation of bias, reference categories were determined by the lowest numerical value for each covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 100,161 patient encounters met inclusion criteria (mean patient age 11.2 years ± 3.9; 59.3%, n = 59,416 females). Imaging utilized was US (78.0%; n = 78,115), CT (16.4%, n = 16,405), no imaging (13.9%, n = 13,894), radiography alone (4.4%, n = 4,429), and MRI (3.1%, n = 3,148). The most predictive factors for no imaging were moderate, low, and very low Child Opportunity Index (aOR 1.25, 1.17, and 1.18 [95% CI 1.10-1.33] compared to very high Child Opportunity Index); Black race/ethnicity (aOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.11-1.44] compared to White or Asian race/ethnicity); and public or other insurance (aOR 1.23 and 1.32 [95% CI 1.18-1.41] compared to commercial insurance). The most predictive factors for radiography alone were Black race/ethnicity (aOR 1.30 [95% CI 1.17-1.45] compared to Hispanic race/ethnicity) and public or other insurance (aOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.11-1.44] compared to commercial). The most predictive factors for US were very-high Child Opportunity Index (aOR 1.16 [95% CI 1.09-1.22] compared to very low Child Opportunity Index); Asian, NH-White, or Hispanic race/ethnicity (aOR 1.33, 1.31, 1.30 [95% CI 1.18-1.40] compared to Black race/ethnicity); and commercial insurance (aOR 1.20 [95% CI 1.16-1.25] compared to public insurance). The most predictive factor for CT was White race/ethnicity (aOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.11-1.43] compared with Asian race/ethnicity) and the most predictive factor for MRI was Hispanic race/ethnicity (aOR 1.49 [95% CI 1.17-1.61] compared with Black race/ethnicity). The greatest predictor of cross-sectional imaging was a hospital's region, with CT most likely in southern hospitals (aOR 4.09 [95% CI 2.17-7.70] compared with northeast hospitals). Patient Child Opportunity Index did not predict the likelihood of cross-sectional imaging with CT or MRI in tertiary pediatric centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sociodemographic disparities exist in the imaging of children presenting to tertiary pediatric hospitals with RLQ pain. Future studies are needed to analyze the causes of such disparities both on hospital and departmental levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06076-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06076-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗服务的不平等导致了医疗结果的不平等。近年来,急性阑尾炎患儿的健康结果差异已被记录在案,而影像学利用的社会人口学预测因素尚未得到充分评估:我们的研究旨在评估对右下腹疼痛(RLQ)儿童进行影像诊断的社会人口学预测因素。我们的假设是,在影像学利用方面存在差异:我们在全国范围内对儿科健康信息系统(PHIS)数据库进行了回顾性队列研究,查询了2018年1月至2023年9月期间因RLQ疼痛(ICD代码CM R10.31)就诊的0-18岁儿童的急诊就诊情况。主要暴露包括以儿童机会指数、种族/族裔和保险状况衡量的邻里级社会人口指标。结果包括未进行诊断成像、仅进行放射成像诊断成像、超声波成像(US)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)。在控制了人口统计学变量(年龄、性别)和其他变量(医院地理区域、成像时间)后,多变量逻辑回归分析评估了与主要暴露相关的成像方式使用情况。为避免偏差的延续,参考类别由每个协变量的最低数值决定:共有 100,161 例患者符合纳入标准(患者平均年龄为 11.2 岁 ± 3.9;59.3%,n = 59,416 名女性)。使用的影像学检查包括 US(78.0%;n = 78,115)、CT(16.4%,n = 16,405)、无影像学检查(13.9%,n = 13,894)、单纯放射摄影(4.4%,n = 4,429)和 MRI(3.1%,n = 3,148)。未进行影像学检查的最大预测因素是中度、低度和极低度儿童机会指数(与极高度儿童机会指数相比,aOR 分别为 1.25、1.17 和 1.18 [95% CI 1.10-1.33]);黑人种族/族裔(与白人或亚裔种族/族裔相比,aOR 为 1.26 [95% CI 1.11-1.44]);以及公共保险或其他保险(与商业保险相比,aOR 分别为 1.23 和 1.32 [95% CI 1.18-1.41])。与西班牙裔种族/人种相比,黑人种族/人种(aOR 1.30 [95% CI 1.17-1.45])和公共或其他保险(与商业保险相比,aOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.11-1.44])对单纯放射摄影最具预测性。对美国最具预测性的因素是儿童机会指数非常高(与儿童机会指数非常低相比,aOR 为 1.16 [95% CI 1.09-1.22]);亚裔、新罕布什尔-白人或西班牙裔种族/族裔(与黑人种族/族裔相比,aOR 为 1.33、1.31、1.30 [95% CI 1.18-1.40]);以及商业保险(与公共保险相比,aOR 为 1.20 [95% CI 1.16-1.25])。CT的最大预测因素是白人种族/族裔(与亚裔种族/族裔相比,aOR为1.26 [95% CI 1.11-1.43]),MRI的最大预测因素是西班牙裔种族/族裔(与黑人种族/族裔相比,aOR为1.49 [95% CI 1.17-1.61])。横断面成像的最大预测因素是医院所在地区,与东北部医院相比,南部医院最有可能采用 CT(aOR 4.09 [95% CI 2.17-7.70])。在三级儿科中心,患者儿童机会指数并不能预测CT或MRI横断面成像的可能性:结论:在三级儿科医院就诊的 RLQ 疼痛患儿的影像学检查存在社会人口学差异。今后的研究需要从医院和科室两个层面分析造成这种差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sociodemographic predictors of imaging utilization in children with right lower quadrant pain.

Background: Inequities in health care access lead to inequities in outcome. In recent years, health outcome disparities have been documented in children with acute appendicitis and sociodemographic predictors of imaging utilization have not been adequately assessed.

Objective: The purpose of our study is to assess sociodemographic predictors for the diagnostic imaging of children with right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain. Our hypothesis is that disparities exist in imaging utilization.

Materials and methods: Our nationwide retrospective cohort study of the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database queried emergency department encounters for children aged 0-18 years presenting with RLQ pain (ICD code CM R10.31) between January 2018 and September 2023. Primary exposures included neighborhood-level sociodemographic metrics as measured by Child Opportunity Index, race/ethnicity, and insurance status. Outcomes included no diagnostic imaging, diagnostic imaging with radiography alone, ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed modality usage with respect to the primary exposures after controlling for demographic (age, gender) and additional (hospital geographic region, time of imaging) covariates. To avoid the perpetuation of bias, reference categories were determined by the lowest numerical value for each covariate.

Results: In total, 100,161 patient encounters met inclusion criteria (mean patient age 11.2 years ± 3.9; 59.3%, n = 59,416 females). Imaging utilized was US (78.0%; n = 78,115), CT (16.4%, n = 16,405), no imaging (13.9%, n = 13,894), radiography alone (4.4%, n = 4,429), and MRI (3.1%, n = 3,148). The most predictive factors for no imaging were moderate, low, and very low Child Opportunity Index (aOR 1.25, 1.17, and 1.18 [95% CI 1.10-1.33] compared to very high Child Opportunity Index); Black race/ethnicity (aOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.11-1.44] compared to White or Asian race/ethnicity); and public or other insurance (aOR 1.23 and 1.32 [95% CI 1.18-1.41] compared to commercial insurance). The most predictive factors for radiography alone were Black race/ethnicity (aOR 1.30 [95% CI 1.17-1.45] compared to Hispanic race/ethnicity) and public or other insurance (aOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.11-1.44] compared to commercial). The most predictive factors for US were very-high Child Opportunity Index (aOR 1.16 [95% CI 1.09-1.22] compared to very low Child Opportunity Index); Asian, NH-White, or Hispanic race/ethnicity (aOR 1.33, 1.31, 1.30 [95% CI 1.18-1.40] compared to Black race/ethnicity); and commercial insurance (aOR 1.20 [95% CI 1.16-1.25] compared to public insurance). The most predictive factor for CT was White race/ethnicity (aOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.11-1.43] compared with Asian race/ethnicity) and the most predictive factor for MRI was Hispanic race/ethnicity (aOR 1.49 [95% CI 1.17-1.61] compared with Black race/ethnicity). The greatest predictor of cross-sectional imaging was a hospital's region, with CT most likely in southern hospitals (aOR 4.09 [95% CI 2.17-7.70] compared with northeast hospitals). Patient Child Opportunity Index did not predict the likelihood of cross-sectional imaging with CT or MRI in tertiary pediatric centers.

Conclusion: Sociodemographic disparities exist in the imaging of children presenting to tertiary pediatric hospitals with RLQ pain. Future studies are needed to analyze the causes of such disparities both on hospital and departmental levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
期刊最新文献
Rapid and motion-robust pediatric brain imaging: T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo PROPELLER acquisition with compressed sensing. The many faces of pediatric hydatid disease: a pictorial review. Ultrasound evaluation of superficial lesions caused by ectoparasites in children. Renal vascular involvement in neurofibromatosis type 1. Quantified small bowel motility assessment on magnetic resonance enterography in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease - does it reflect clinical response?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1