组织工程食道移植物的临床转化:患者准备好了吗?

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Surgery International Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1007/s00383-024-05866-y
N Durkin, M Pellegrini, V Karaluka, G Slater, D Leyden, S Eaton, Paolo De Coppi
{"title":"组织工程食道移植物的临床转化:患者准备好了吗?","authors":"N Durkin, M Pellegrini, V Karaluka, G Slater, D Leyden, S Eaton, Paolo De Coppi","doi":"10.1007/s00383-024-05866-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We sought to engage with expert patient/carers to understand attitudes towards use of tissue engineering (TE) for long-gap oesophageal atresia (OA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An in-person engagement event for 70 patients/parents was held by the OA patient group, TOFS. Attitudes towards TE were assessed before and after a talk on use of TE oesophagi in a pre-clinical OA model. Perceptions were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (median [range]) and compared using Mann-Whitney test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>43 attendees responded; 56% parents/caregivers, 21% patients, 7% healthcare workers, 16% unreported. Most (85%) had some awareness of TE but for 15%, it was a new concept. Attendees were receptive to TE; 89% reported no concerns about growth of their/child(s) cells in a lab and 61% reported no concerns about using animal products. Perceptions of TE significantly improved after the presentation from 4 (2-5, n = 32) to 5 (3-5, n = 28) p < 0.0001, and 96% would like to be involved in focus groups on development of a TE product for use in OA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Input from key stakeholders is essential to introduction of TE constructs clinically. The overall response to TE constructs was positive, and informs development of an OA-specific focus group to guide translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"40 1","pages":"291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical translation of tissue-engineered oesophageal grafts: are patients ready for us?\",\"authors\":\"N Durkin, M Pellegrini, V Karaluka, G Slater, D Leyden, S Eaton, Paolo De Coppi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00383-024-05866-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We sought to engage with expert patient/carers to understand attitudes towards use of tissue engineering (TE) for long-gap oesophageal atresia (OA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An in-person engagement event for 70 patients/parents was held by the OA patient group, TOFS. Attitudes towards TE were assessed before and after a talk on use of TE oesophagi in a pre-clinical OA model. Perceptions were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (median [range]) and compared using Mann-Whitney test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>43 attendees responded; 56% parents/caregivers, 21% patients, 7% healthcare workers, 16% unreported. Most (85%) had some awareness of TE but for 15%, it was a new concept. Attendees were receptive to TE; 89% reported no concerns about growth of their/child(s) cells in a lab and 61% reported no concerns about using animal products. Perceptions of TE significantly improved after the presentation from 4 (2-5, n = 32) to 5 (3-5, n = 28) p < 0.0001, and 96% would like to be involved in focus groups on development of a TE product for use in OA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Input from key stakeholders is essential to introduction of TE constructs clinically. The overall response to TE constructs was positive, and informs development of an OA-specific focus group to guide translation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541389/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05866-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05866-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们试图与专家患者/护理人员接触,了解他们对使用组织工程(TE)治疗长间隙食道闭锁(OA)的态度:OA患者团体TOFS为70名患者/家长举办了一次面对面的参与活动。在关于在临床前 OA 模型中使用 TE 食管的讲座前后,对患者对 TE 的态度进行了评估。评估采用 5 点李克特量表(中位数[范围]),并使用 Mann-Whitney 检验进行比较:43名参与者做出了回应;其中56%为家长/护理人员,21%为患者,7%为医护人员,16%未作报告。大多数人(85%)对 TE 有一定了解,但对 15%的人来说,这是一个新概念。与会者对 TE 持接受态度;89% 的人表示不担心自己/子女的细胞在实验室中生长,61% 的人表示不担心使用动物产品。演讲结束后,与会者对 TE 的认知度明显提高,从 4(2-5,n=32)提高到 5(3-5,n=28) p 结论:主要利益相关者的意见对于在临床上引入 TE 结构至关重要。对 TE 构建的总体反应是积极的,这为建立一个专门针对 OA 的焦点小组以指导翻译提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical translation of tissue-engineered oesophageal grafts: are patients ready for us?

Purpose: We sought to engage with expert patient/carers to understand attitudes towards use of tissue engineering (TE) for long-gap oesophageal atresia (OA).

Methods: An in-person engagement event for 70 patients/parents was held by the OA patient group, TOFS. Attitudes towards TE were assessed before and after a talk on use of TE oesophagi in a pre-clinical OA model. Perceptions were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (median [range]) and compared using Mann-Whitney test.

Results: 43 attendees responded; 56% parents/caregivers, 21% patients, 7% healthcare workers, 16% unreported. Most (85%) had some awareness of TE but for 15%, it was a new concept. Attendees were receptive to TE; 89% reported no concerns about growth of their/child(s) cells in a lab and 61% reported no concerns about using animal products. Perceptions of TE significantly improved after the presentation from 4 (2-5, n = 32) to 5 (3-5, n = 28) p < 0.0001, and 96% would like to be involved in focus groups on development of a TE product for use in OA.

Conclusion: Input from key stakeholders is essential to introduction of TE constructs clinically. The overall response to TE constructs was positive, and informs development of an OA-specific focus group to guide translation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
期刊最新文献
A comparative study on the efficacy of laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy versus single ureteral bladder reimplantation in treating pediatric complete renal duplication. Chyme reinfusion practices in the neonatal population. Comparison of different Kasai portoenterostomy techniques in the outcomes of biliary atresia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Association between nighttime/weekend visits and patient outcomes in children with blunt liver and spleen injuries. Innovative minimally invasive gastric pull-up techniques in children: SILS and robot-assisted gastric pull-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1