Jie Li, Paul Karabelas, Lingyue Gong, Caylie A Sheridan, James B Fink
{"title":"在儿科和新生儿机械通气期间,吸气同步小颗粒原型与传统振动网状雾化器的功效对比。","authors":"Jie Li, Paul Karabelas, Lingyue Gong, Caylie A Sheridan, James B Fink","doi":"10.1002/ppul.27356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An inspiration-synchronized vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) has been reported to improve aerosol delivery during adult mechanical ventilation. A prototype VMN generating smaller particles was developed. We aimed to compare the aerosol delivery efficiency of small-particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration-synchronized and continuous modes during neonatal and pediatric mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A critical care ventilator with heated humidified circuits connected to an endotracheal tube (ETT) and passive test lung was set to pediatric and neonate parameters. Albuterol (2.5 mg/ml, 1 ml) was administered using both small-particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration-synchronization and continuous modes. For the pediatric model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet, inspiratory limb at Y-piece, and between Y-piece and ETT (Y-ETT). For the neonatal model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet and between Y-ETT. Each setup was repeated five times. Albuterol collected on the filter distal to the ETT was eluted and assayed with UV spectrophotometry (276 nm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inspiration-synchronized VMN generated higher inhaled doses compared to continuous VMN across all nebulizer placements, particle sizes, and aerosol generation models (all p < .05). The highest inhaled doses (42.2 ± 2.0% and 40.7 ± 1.0% for pediatric and neonate, respectively) were observed with the small-particle inspiration-synchronized VMN placed at Y-ETT. In the pediatric model, the inhaled dose with inspiration-synchronized conventional VMN was similar, independent of nebulizer placements (24.4 ~ 27.0%). In contrast, the inhaled dose was greatest with continuous VMN placed at the humidifier inlet. With the neonatal model, VMN placed at Y-ETT yielded higher doses than the humidifier inlet, and small-particle VMNs outperformed conventional VMNs across all settings (all p < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prototype small-particle VMN positioned between Y-piece and ETT in an inspiration-synchronized mode optimized aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation in both pediatric and neonatal models.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of a prototype inspiratory-synchronized small particle versus conventional vibrating mesh nebulizer during pediatric and neonatal mechanical ventilation.\",\"authors\":\"Jie Li, Paul Karabelas, Lingyue Gong, Caylie A Sheridan, James B Fink\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppul.27356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An inspiration-synchronized vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) has been reported to improve aerosol delivery during adult mechanical ventilation. A prototype VMN generating smaller particles was developed. We aimed to compare the aerosol delivery efficiency of small-particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration-synchronized and continuous modes during neonatal and pediatric mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A critical care ventilator with heated humidified circuits connected to an endotracheal tube (ETT) and passive test lung was set to pediatric and neonate parameters. Albuterol (2.5 mg/ml, 1 ml) was administered using both small-particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration-synchronization and continuous modes. For the pediatric model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet, inspiratory limb at Y-piece, and between Y-piece and ETT (Y-ETT). For the neonatal model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet and between Y-ETT. Each setup was repeated five times. Albuterol collected on the filter distal to the ETT was eluted and assayed with UV spectrophotometry (276 nm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inspiration-synchronized VMN generated higher inhaled doses compared to continuous VMN across all nebulizer placements, particle sizes, and aerosol generation models (all p < .05). The highest inhaled doses (42.2 ± 2.0% and 40.7 ± 1.0% for pediatric and neonate, respectively) were observed with the small-particle inspiration-synchronized VMN placed at Y-ETT. In the pediatric model, the inhaled dose with inspiration-synchronized conventional VMN was similar, independent of nebulizer placements (24.4 ~ 27.0%). In contrast, the inhaled dose was greatest with continuous VMN placed at the humidifier inlet. With the neonatal model, VMN placed at Y-ETT yielded higher doses than the humidifier inlet, and small-particle VMNs outperformed conventional VMNs across all settings (all p < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prototype small-particle VMN positioned between Y-piece and ETT in an inspiration-synchronized mode optimized aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation in both pediatric and neonatal models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27356\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27356","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:据报道,吸气同步振动网状雾化器(VMN)可改善成人机械通气过程中的气溶胶输送。我们开发了一种可产生较小颗粒的原型 VMN。我们的目的是在新生儿和儿童机械通气过程中,比较吸气同步模式和持续模式下小颗粒和传统 VMN 的气溶胶输送效率:重症监护呼吸机配有加热加湿回路,与气管导管(ETT)和被动测试肺相连,并设置为儿科和新生儿参数。在吸气同步和持续模式下,使用小颗粒和传统 VMN 给药阿布特罗(2.5 毫克/毫升,1 毫升)。在儿科模型中,VMN 被放置在加湿器入口处、Y 片的吸气肢以及 Y 片和 ETT(Y-ETT)之间。在新生儿模型中,VMN 位于加湿器入口和 Y-ETT 之间。每种设置重复五次。洗脱收集在 ETT 远端过滤器上的阿布特罗,并用紫外分光光度法(276 纳米)进行检测:结果:在所有雾化器位置、颗粒大小和气溶胶生成模型中,吸气同步 VMN 产生的吸入剂量均高于持续 VMN(所有 p 均为结论):原型小颗粒 VMN 位于 Y 片和 ETT 之间,采用吸气同步模式,优化了儿科和新生儿模型机械通气期间的气溶胶输送。
Efficacy of a prototype inspiratory-synchronized small particle versus conventional vibrating mesh nebulizer during pediatric and neonatal mechanical ventilation.
Background: An inspiration-synchronized vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) has been reported to improve aerosol delivery during adult mechanical ventilation. A prototype VMN generating smaller particles was developed. We aimed to compare the aerosol delivery efficiency of small-particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration-synchronized and continuous modes during neonatal and pediatric mechanical ventilation.
Methods: A critical care ventilator with heated humidified circuits connected to an endotracheal tube (ETT) and passive test lung was set to pediatric and neonate parameters. Albuterol (2.5 mg/ml, 1 ml) was administered using both small-particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration-synchronization and continuous modes. For the pediatric model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet, inspiratory limb at Y-piece, and between Y-piece and ETT (Y-ETT). For the neonatal model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet and between Y-ETT. Each setup was repeated five times. Albuterol collected on the filter distal to the ETT was eluted and assayed with UV spectrophotometry (276 nm).
Results: The inspiration-synchronized VMN generated higher inhaled doses compared to continuous VMN across all nebulizer placements, particle sizes, and aerosol generation models (all p < .05). The highest inhaled doses (42.2 ± 2.0% and 40.7 ± 1.0% for pediatric and neonate, respectively) were observed with the small-particle inspiration-synchronized VMN placed at Y-ETT. In the pediatric model, the inhaled dose with inspiration-synchronized conventional VMN was similar, independent of nebulizer placements (24.4 ~ 27.0%). In contrast, the inhaled dose was greatest with continuous VMN placed at the humidifier inlet. With the neonatal model, VMN placed at Y-ETT yielded higher doses than the humidifier inlet, and small-particle VMNs outperformed conventional VMNs across all settings (all p < .05).
Conclusion: The prototype small-particle VMN positioned between Y-piece and ETT in an inspiration-synchronized mode optimized aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation in both pediatric and neonatal models.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases.
PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.