表达:语言工作记忆中的定向注意有什么好处?

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1177/17470218241299918
Stephanie Jeanneret, Evie Vergauwe, Caro Hautekiet, Naomi Langerock
{"title":"表达:语言工作记忆中的定向注意有什么好处?","authors":"Stephanie Jeanneret, Evie Vergauwe, Caro Hautekiet, Naomi Langerock","doi":"10.1177/17470218241299918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Information that is particularly relevant for upcoming behavior can be prioritized within working memory, by directing attention to it. Receiving focused attention during retention is assumed to be associated with specific benefits, such as increased memory performance and reduced vulnerability to perceptual distractions. This has been demonstrated in visuospatial working memory. Given the domain-general nature of the focus of attention, these benefits should extend to verbal working memory as well. This was tested in the current study. In particular, we examined and compared the effects of cue-based and reward-based prioritization in verbal working memory across a series of five preregistered experiments. These experiments varied in their memory materials, set size, interference, and memory task. Our results collectively revealed several key findings. Firstly, both cue-based and reward-based prioritization led to a clear and consistent memory boost for prioritized information in verbal working memory. Secondly, the memory boost induced by cue-based prioritization was mostly comparable to that induced by reward-based prioritization. Thirdly, memory for verbal information did not drastically suffer when exposed to perceptual interference. And lastly, the effect of perceptual interference on verbal information was not drastically influenced by whether the information was prioritized or not. Overall, this series of experiments contributes to understanding the consequences of directed attention in verbal working memory and highlights similarities and differences from findings in visuospatial working memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218241299918"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: What are the benefits of directed attention within verbal working memory?\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Jeanneret, Evie Vergauwe, Caro Hautekiet, Naomi Langerock\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17470218241299918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Information that is particularly relevant for upcoming behavior can be prioritized within working memory, by directing attention to it. Receiving focused attention during retention is assumed to be associated with specific benefits, such as increased memory performance and reduced vulnerability to perceptual distractions. This has been demonstrated in visuospatial working memory. Given the domain-general nature of the focus of attention, these benefits should extend to verbal working memory as well. This was tested in the current study. In particular, we examined and compared the effects of cue-based and reward-based prioritization in verbal working memory across a series of five preregistered experiments. These experiments varied in their memory materials, set size, interference, and memory task. Our results collectively revealed several key findings. Firstly, both cue-based and reward-based prioritization led to a clear and consistent memory boost for prioritized information in verbal working memory. Secondly, the memory boost induced by cue-based prioritization was mostly comparable to that induced by reward-based prioritization. Thirdly, memory for verbal information did not drastically suffer when exposed to perceptual interference. And lastly, the effect of perceptual interference on verbal information was not drastically influenced by whether the information was prioritized or not. Overall, this series of experiments contributes to understanding the consequences of directed attention in verbal working memory and highlights similarities and differences from findings in visuospatial working memory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17470218241299918\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241299918\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241299918","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在工作记忆中,与即将发生的行为特别相关的信息可以通过引导注意力的方式得到优先处理。在记忆过程中集中注意力被认为与特定的益处有关,如提高记忆效果和减少对知觉干扰的脆弱性。视觉空间工作记忆已经证明了这一点。鉴于注意力集中的领域普遍性,这些益处也应扩展到言语工作记忆中。本研究对此进行了测试。具体而言,我们通过五个预先登记的实验,考察并比较了基于线索和基于奖励的优先级在言语工作记忆中的效果。这些实验的记忆材料、集合大小、干扰和记忆任务各不相同。我们的结果共同揭示了几个关键发现。首先,无论是基于线索还是基于奖励的优先化,都会对言语工作记忆中的优先化信息产生明显而一致的记忆促进作用。其次,基于线索的优先排序与基于奖励的优先排序所引起的记忆增强效果大体相当。第三,当受到知觉干扰时,对言语信息的记忆并没有大幅减弱。最后,知觉干扰对言语信息的影响并没有因为信息是否被优先处理而受到很大影响。总之,这一系列实验有助于理解定向注意在言语工作记忆中的后果,并突出了与视觉空间工作记忆研究结果的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS: What are the benefits of directed attention within verbal working memory?

Information that is particularly relevant for upcoming behavior can be prioritized within working memory, by directing attention to it. Receiving focused attention during retention is assumed to be associated with specific benefits, such as increased memory performance and reduced vulnerability to perceptual distractions. This has been demonstrated in visuospatial working memory. Given the domain-general nature of the focus of attention, these benefits should extend to verbal working memory as well. This was tested in the current study. In particular, we examined and compared the effects of cue-based and reward-based prioritization in verbal working memory across a series of five preregistered experiments. These experiments varied in their memory materials, set size, interference, and memory task. Our results collectively revealed several key findings. Firstly, both cue-based and reward-based prioritization led to a clear and consistent memory boost for prioritized information in verbal working memory. Secondly, the memory boost induced by cue-based prioritization was mostly comparable to that induced by reward-based prioritization. Thirdly, memory for verbal information did not drastically suffer when exposed to perceptual interference. And lastly, the effect of perceptual interference on verbal information was not drastically influenced by whether the information was prioritized or not. Overall, this series of experiments contributes to understanding the consequences of directed attention in verbal working memory and highlights similarities and differences from findings in visuospatial working memory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
期刊最新文献
Reasoning in social versus non-social domains and its relation to autistic traits. When is a causal illusion an illusion? Separating discriminability and bias in human contingency judgements. Advancing an account of hierarchical dual-task control: A focused review on abstract higher-level task representations in dual-task situations. The effect of chronic academic stress on attentional bias towards value-associated stimuli. Is the precedence of social re-orienting only inherent to the initiators?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1