来曲唑与来曲唑和枸橼酸氯米芬(CC)联合用于多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)亚孕期妇女促排卵的比较--一项开放标签随机对照试验。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1007/s43032-024-01743-0
Sharmistha Sarkar, Nivedita Gupta, Treasa Joseph, Bijesh Yadav, Aleyamma T Kunjummen, Mohan S Kamath
{"title":"来曲唑与来曲唑和枸橼酸氯米芬(CC)联合用于多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)亚孕期妇女促排卵的比较--一项开放标签随机对照试验。","authors":"Sharmistha Sarkar, Nivedita Gupta, Treasa Joseph, Bijesh Yadav, Aleyamma T Kunjummen, Mohan S Kamath","doi":"10.1007/s43032-024-01743-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of Letrozole and Clomiphene (CC) combination versus Letrozole alone for ovulation induction in infertile women with PCOS. This was an open label randomized controlled trial conducted between September 2020 and March 2023 at a tertiary level hospital. Women with a diagnosis of infertility and PCOS were included. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio, to either the combination of 2.5 mg letrozole and 50 mg Clomiphene Citrate (CC) daily or 2.5 mg letrozole alone from 2nd to 6<sup>th</sup>day of menstrual cycle for up to three treatment cycles. The primary outcome was ovulation rate per cycle. The secondary outcomes included ovulation rate per woman randomised, cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates. A total of the 120 participants, 59 women in Letrozole and CC arm (intervention) and 61 women in the Letrozole alone arm (control) were recruited. The woman per cycle ovulation rate following Letrozole and CC combination versus Letrozole alone (71/92 (77.2%) vs. 52/83 (62.6%), RR 1.43, 95%CI 0.99 to 2.06) but was not statistically significant. A per ITT analysis, the clinical pregnancy rate per woman randomized (16/61(26.2%) vs. 13/59(22%), RR 1.12, 95%CI 0.76 to 1.64) and live birth rate per woman randomized (10/61(16.4%) vs 11/59(18.6%), RR 0.92, 095%CI 0.57 to 1.50) did not differ significantly between Letrozole and CC versus Letrozole group. There was no significant improvement in ovulation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates with a combination of letrozole and CC versus letrozole alone in per woman randomized with PCOS. Trial RegistrationThe trial was prospectively registered in the clinical trial registry of India (CTRI registration number CTRI/2020/07/026263), Registration dated: February 26, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Letrozole Versus Combination Letrozole and Clomiphene Citrate (CC) for Ovulation Induction in Sub Fertile Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS)-An Open Label Randomized Control Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sharmistha Sarkar, Nivedita Gupta, Treasa Joseph, Bijesh Yadav, Aleyamma T Kunjummen, Mohan S Kamath\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43032-024-01743-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of Letrozole and Clomiphene (CC) combination versus Letrozole alone for ovulation induction in infertile women with PCOS. This was an open label randomized controlled trial conducted between September 2020 and March 2023 at a tertiary level hospital. Women with a diagnosis of infertility and PCOS were included. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio, to either the combination of 2.5 mg letrozole and 50 mg Clomiphene Citrate (CC) daily or 2.5 mg letrozole alone from 2nd to 6<sup>th</sup>day of menstrual cycle for up to three treatment cycles. The primary outcome was ovulation rate per cycle. The secondary outcomes included ovulation rate per woman randomised, cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates. A total of the 120 participants, 59 women in Letrozole and CC arm (intervention) and 61 women in the Letrozole alone arm (control) were recruited. The woman per cycle ovulation rate following Letrozole and CC combination versus Letrozole alone (71/92 (77.2%) vs. 52/83 (62.6%), RR 1.43, 95%CI 0.99 to 2.06) but was not statistically significant. A per ITT analysis, the clinical pregnancy rate per woman randomized (16/61(26.2%) vs. 13/59(22%), RR 1.12, 95%CI 0.76 to 1.64) and live birth rate per woman randomized (10/61(16.4%) vs 11/59(18.6%), RR 0.92, 095%CI 0.57 to 1.50) did not differ significantly between Letrozole and CC versus Letrozole group. There was no significant improvement in ovulation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates with a combination of letrozole and CC versus letrozole alone in per woman randomized with PCOS. Trial RegistrationThe trial was prospectively registered in the clinical trial registry of India (CTRI registration number CTRI/2020/07/026263), Registration dated: February 26, 2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01743-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01743-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估来曲唑和克罗米芬(CC)联合与来曲唑单独用于多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)不孕妇女促排卵的有效性。这是一项开放标签随机对照试验,于 2020 年 9 月至 2023 年 3 月在一家三级医院进行。研究对象包括确诊为不孕症和多囊卵巢综合征的女性。参与者按1:1的比例随机接受每天2.5毫克来曲唑和50毫克枸橼酸氯米芬(CC)的联合治疗,或在月经周期的第2至第6天单用2.5毫克来曲唑,最多治疗3个周期。主要结果是每个周期的排卵率。次要结果包括每位随机女性的排卵率、累计怀孕率和活产率。共招募了120名参与者,其中59名妇女参加来曲唑和CC治疗组(干预组),61名妇女参加来曲唑单独治疗组(对照组)。来曲唑和CC联合治疗与来曲唑单药治疗相比,妇女每个周期的排卵率分别为71/92(77.2%)对52/83(62.6%),RR为1.43,95%CI为0.99至2.06),但无统计学意义。根据 ITT 分析,来曲唑和 CC 组与来曲唑组相比,每位随机妇女的临床妊娠率(16/61(26.2%) vs. 13/59(22%),RR 1.12,95%CI 0.76 至 1.64)和每位随机妇女的活产率(10/61(16.4%) vs. 11/59(18.6%),RR 0.92,095%CI 0.57 至 1.50)没有显著差异。在多囊卵巢综合征患者中,来曲唑和CC联合用药与来曲唑单独用药相比,在排卵、临床妊娠或活产率方面没有明显改善。试验注册该试验在印度临床试验注册中心进行了前瞻性注册(注册号为 CTRI/2020/07/026263),注册日期为 2020 年 2 月 26 日:注册日期:2020 年 2 月 26 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Letrozole Versus Combination Letrozole and Clomiphene Citrate (CC) for Ovulation Induction in Sub Fertile Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS)-An Open Label Randomized Control Trial.

To evaluate the effectiveness of Letrozole and Clomiphene (CC) combination versus Letrozole alone for ovulation induction in infertile women with PCOS. This was an open label randomized controlled trial conducted between September 2020 and March 2023 at a tertiary level hospital. Women with a diagnosis of infertility and PCOS were included. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio, to either the combination of 2.5 mg letrozole and 50 mg Clomiphene Citrate (CC) daily or 2.5 mg letrozole alone from 2nd to 6thday of menstrual cycle for up to three treatment cycles. The primary outcome was ovulation rate per cycle. The secondary outcomes included ovulation rate per woman randomised, cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates. A total of the 120 participants, 59 women in Letrozole and CC arm (intervention) and 61 women in the Letrozole alone arm (control) were recruited. The woman per cycle ovulation rate following Letrozole and CC combination versus Letrozole alone (71/92 (77.2%) vs. 52/83 (62.6%), RR 1.43, 95%CI 0.99 to 2.06) but was not statistically significant. A per ITT analysis, the clinical pregnancy rate per woman randomized (16/61(26.2%) vs. 13/59(22%), RR 1.12, 95%CI 0.76 to 1.64) and live birth rate per woman randomized (10/61(16.4%) vs 11/59(18.6%), RR 0.92, 095%CI 0.57 to 1.50) did not differ significantly between Letrozole and CC versus Letrozole group. There was no significant improvement in ovulation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates with a combination of letrozole and CC versus letrozole alone in per woman randomized with PCOS. Trial RegistrationThe trial was prospectively registered in the clinical trial registry of India (CTRI registration number CTRI/2020/07/026263), Registration dated: February 26, 2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Sciences
Reproductive Sciences 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
322
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Letrozole Versus Combination Letrozole and Clomiphene Citrate (CC) for Ovulation Induction in Sub Fertile Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS)-An Open Label Randomized Control Trial. Establishment of 3D Cultures of Myometrium, Leiomyoma, and Leiomyosarcoma Cells: Advantages and Disadvantages of Two Different Models. Menstrual Blood-Derived Endometrial Stem Cells Ameliorate Ovarian Senescence by Relieving Oxidative Stress-Induced Inflammation. Polycystic Ovary Morphology, Subclinical Hypothyroidism, and the Cutoff Value of Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone, a Population-Based Study. Effect of Different Concentrations of PRP on the Expression of Factors Involved in the Endometrial Receptivity in the Human Endometrial Cells from RIF Patients Compared to the Controls.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1