束状纤维桩和传统纤维桩同时存在水平骨丢失和开裂:有限元分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1080/10255842.2024.2423266
Deniz Yanık, Nurullah Türker, Ahmet Mert Nalbantoğlu
{"title":"束状纤维桩和传统纤维桩同时存在水平骨丢失和开裂:有限元分析。","authors":"Deniz Yanık, Nurullah Türker, Ahmet Mert Nalbantoğlu","doi":"10.1080/10255842.2024.2423266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Horizontal bone loss (HBL) and dehiscence are common supportive tissue defects. This study evaluated the stress distribution in the presence of HBL or dehiscence and two types of fiber posts. Twelve premolars that were endodontically treated (Model-E), restored with conventional (Model-C), and bundle (Model-B) post were modeled. Bone defects were created as control (Model-1), with 4 mm (Model-4) and 8 mm (Model-8) HBL, and dehiscence involving two-thirds of the root (Model-D). HBL was included in all aspects of the models, while dehiscence was confined to the buccal aspect. The models were subjected to a 200 N force, and von Mises stress was analyzed. Model-B1 showed higher stress than Model-C1 but was more homogeneous. In Model-D, the stress was limited to the area without bone and only occurred at the buccal aspect. The highest stress was observed in Model-B8. The presence of a post caused a 2-5.8 times increase in stress. When the crown-root ratio was 1:0.8, stress was in the coronal two-thirds of the root, while at a ratio of 1:0.3, stress was distributed throughout the entire root. Bundle post with 8 mm HBL increased the stress 5.8 times. HBL resulted in stress extending beyond the marginal bone, while dehiscence did not.</p>","PeriodicalId":50640,"journal":{"name":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coexistence of horizontal bone loss and dehiscence with the bundle and conventional fiber post: a finite element analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Deniz Yanık, Nurullah Türker, Ahmet Mert Nalbantoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10255842.2024.2423266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Horizontal bone loss (HBL) and dehiscence are common supportive tissue defects. This study evaluated the stress distribution in the presence of HBL or dehiscence and two types of fiber posts. Twelve premolars that were endodontically treated (Model-E), restored with conventional (Model-C), and bundle (Model-B) post were modeled. Bone defects were created as control (Model-1), with 4 mm (Model-4) and 8 mm (Model-8) HBL, and dehiscence involving two-thirds of the root (Model-D). HBL was included in all aspects of the models, while dehiscence was confined to the buccal aspect. The models were subjected to a 200 N force, and von Mises stress was analyzed. Model-B1 showed higher stress than Model-C1 but was more homogeneous. In Model-D, the stress was limited to the area without bone and only occurred at the buccal aspect. The highest stress was observed in Model-B8. The presence of a post caused a 2-5.8 times increase in stress. When the crown-root ratio was 1:0.8, stress was in the coronal two-thirds of the root, while at a ratio of 1:0.3, stress was distributed throughout the entire root. Bundle post with 8 mm HBL increased the stress 5.8 times. HBL resulted in stress extending beyond the marginal bone, while dehiscence did not.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2024.2423266\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2024.2423266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水平骨缺失(HBL)和开裂是常见的支持组织缺损。本研究评估了存在 HBL 或开裂以及两种纤维桩时的应力分布。研究人员对 12 颗经过牙髓治疗(模型-E)、使用传统(模型-C)和束状(模型-B)桩修复的前臼齿进行了建模。骨缺损分为对照组(模型-1)、4 毫米(模型-4)和 8 毫米(模型-8)HBL 以及涉及三分之二牙根的开裂(模型-D)。HBL 包括在模型的所有方面,而开裂仅限于颊侧。对模型施加 200 N 的力并分析 von Mises 应力。模型-B1 的应力高于模型-C1,但更均匀。在模型-D 中,应力仅限于没有骨头的区域,而且只发生在颊侧。模型-B8 的应力最大。基桩的存在导致应力增加了 2-5.8 倍。当牙冠与牙根的比例为 1:0.8 时,应力位于牙根冠状面的三分之二处,而当比例为 1:0.3 时,应力分布于整个牙根。带有 8 毫米 HBL 的束柱使应力增加了 5.8 倍。HBL 导致应力超出边缘骨,而开裂则不会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coexistence of horizontal bone loss and dehiscence with the bundle and conventional fiber post: a finite element analysis.

Horizontal bone loss (HBL) and dehiscence are common supportive tissue defects. This study evaluated the stress distribution in the presence of HBL or dehiscence and two types of fiber posts. Twelve premolars that were endodontically treated (Model-E), restored with conventional (Model-C), and bundle (Model-B) post were modeled. Bone defects were created as control (Model-1), with 4 mm (Model-4) and 8 mm (Model-8) HBL, and dehiscence involving two-thirds of the root (Model-D). HBL was included in all aspects of the models, while dehiscence was confined to the buccal aspect. The models were subjected to a 200 N force, and von Mises stress was analyzed. Model-B1 showed higher stress than Model-C1 but was more homogeneous. In Model-D, the stress was limited to the area without bone and only occurred at the buccal aspect. The highest stress was observed in Model-B8. The presence of a post caused a 2-5.8 times increase in stress. When the crown-root ratio was 1:0.8, stress was in the coronal two-thirds of the root, while at a ratio of 1:0.3, stress was distributed throughout the entire root. Bundle post with 8 mm HBL increased the stress 5.8 times. HBL resulted in stress extending beyond the marginal bone, while dehiscence did not.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
179
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary aims of Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering are to provide a means of communicating the advances being made in the areas of biomechanics and biomedical engineering and to stimulate interest in the continually emerging computer based technologies which are being applied in these multidisciplinary subjects. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering will also provide a focus for the importance of integrating the disciplines of engineering with medical technology and clinical expertise. Such integration will have a major impact on health care in the future.
期刊最新文献
Accurate detection of gait events using neural networks and IMU data mimicking real-world smartphone usage. Exploring coronavirus sequence motifs through convolutional neural network for accurate identification of COVID-19. Coexistence of horizontal bone loss and dehiscence with the bundle and conventional fiber post: a finite element analysis. Effects of a soft back exoskeleton on lower lumbar spine loads during manual materials handling: a musculoskeletal modelling study. Mechanical effect of taper position in abutment hole and screw taper angles on implant system and peri-implant tissue: a finite element analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1