日本射频肾脏去神经治疗不受控制的高血压的成本效益。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Clinical Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1111/jch.14922
Kazuomi Kario, Khoa N Cao, Yuji Tanaka, Anne M Ryschon, Jan B Pietzsch
{"title":"日本射频肾脏去神经治疗不受控制的高血压的成本效益。","authors":"Kazuomi Kario, Khoa N Cao, Yuji Tanaka, Anne M Ryschon, Jan B Pietzsch","doi":"10.1111/jch.14922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is a novel therapy for uncontrolled hypertension. In the recent sham-controlled SPYRAL HTN-ON MED study, office-based systolic blood pressure (oSBP) and nighttime BP were reduced significantly. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN in the context of the Japanese healthcare system based on this latest clinical evidence. Clinical events, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were projected using a decision-analytic Markov model adjusted to Japanese incidence data. Risk reduction in clinical events from changes in oSBP was calculated based on a published meta-regression of 47 trials of intentional hypertension treatment. Demographics and results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial (oSBP effect size -4.9 mmHg vs. sham) were utilized in the base case analysis. Additional scenarios were explored including the potential added benefit of improved night-time control. Costs were sourced from claims data and published literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against a cost-effectiveness threshold of ¥5 000 000 per QALY gained. RF RDN was projected to reduce clinical events (10-year relative risks: 0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, and 0.75 for heart failure). Over lifetime, RF RDN added 0.36 QALYs at the incremental cost of ¥923 723, resulting in an ICER of ¥2 565 236 per QALY gained. Under the assumption of added night-time benefit, the ICER decreased to ¥2 155 895 per QALY. Cost-effectiveness findings were robust across all tested scenarios. The findings of this model-based analysis suggest that RF RDN can provide meaningful clinical event reductions and is a cost-effective treatment option in the Japanese healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Renal Denervation for Uncontrolled Hypertension in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuomi Kario, Khoa N Cao, Yuji Tanaka, Anne M Ryschon, Jan B Pietzsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.14922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is a novel therapy for uncontrolled hypertension. In the recent sham-controlled SPYRAL HTN-ON MED study, office-based systolic blood pressure (oSBP) and nighttime BP were reduced significantly. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN in the context of the Japanese healthcare system based on this latest clinical evidence. Clinical events, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were projected using a decision-analytic Markov model adjusted to Japanese incidence data. Risk reduction in clinical events from changes in oSBP was calculated based on a published meta-regression of 47 trials of intentional hypertension treatment. Demographics and results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial (oSBP effect size -4.9 mmHg vs. sham) were utilized in the base case analysis. Additional scenarios were explored including the potential added benefit of improved night-time control. Costs were sourced from claims data and published literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against a cost-effectiveness threshold of ¥5 000 000 per QALY gained. RF RDN was projected to reduce clinical events (10-year relative risks: 0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, and 0.75 for heart failure). Over lifetime, RF RDN added 0.36 QALYs at the incremental cost of ¥923 723, resulting in an ICER of ¥2 565 236 per QALY gained. Under the assumption of added night-time benefit, the ICER decreased to ¥2 155 895 per QALY. Cost-effectiveness findings were robust across all tested scenarios. The findings of this model-based analysis suggest that RF RDN can provide meaningful clinical event reductions and is a cost-effective treatment option in the Japanese healthcare system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.14922\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.14922","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

射频肾脏去神经支配(RF RDN)是一种治疗不受控制的高血压的新型疗法。在最近进行的假对照 SPYRAL HTN-ON MED 研究中,办公室收缩压 (oSBP) 和夜间血压显著降低。本研究根据这些最新的临床证据,在日本医疗保健系统的背景下对 RF RDN 的成本效益进行了研究。根据日本的发病率数据,采用决策分析马尔可夫模型对临床事件、成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)进行了预测。根据已发表的 47 项有意高血压治疗试验的元回归结果,计算了 oSBP 变化对临床事件风险降低的影响。基本病例分析采用了人口统计学和 SPYRAL HTN-ON MED 试验的结果(oSBP 与假性相比的效应大小为 -4.9 mmHg)。还探讨了其他方案,包括改善夜间控制可能带来的额外益处。成本来源于索赔数据和已发表的文献。根据每 QALY 增益 5 000 000 日元的成本效益阈值评估了增量成本效益比 (ICER)。预计 RF RDN 可减少临床事件的发生(10 年相对风险:中风为 0.80,脑卒中为 0.80:中风的相对风险为 0.80,心肌梗死的相对风险为 0.88,心力衰竭的相对风险为 0.75)。在整个生命周期中,RF RDN 可增加 0.36 QALY,增量成本为 923 723 日元,因此每 QALY 收益的 ICER 为 2 565 236 日元。在增加夜间获益的假设下,ICER 降至 2 155 895 ¥/QALY。在所有测试方案中,成本效益结果都是稳健的。这项基于模型的分析结果表明,RF RDN 可以有效减少临床事件,是日本医疗系统中一种具有成本效益的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Renal Denervation for Uncontrolled Hypertension in Japan.

Radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is a novel therapy for uncontrolled hypertension. In the recent sham-controlled SPYRAL HTN-ON MED study, office-based systolic blood pressure (oSBP) and nighttime BP were reduced significantly. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN in the context of the Japanese healthcare system based on this latest clinical evidence. Clinical events, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were projected using a decision-analytic Markov model adjusted to Japanese incidence data. Risk reduction in clinical events from changes in oSBP was calculated based on a published meta-regression of 47 trials of intentional hypertension treatment. Demographics and results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial (oSBP effect size -4.9 mmHg vs. sham) were utilized in the base case analysis. Additional scenarios were explored including the potential added benefit of improved night-time control. Costs were sourced from claims data and published literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against a cost-effectiveness threshold of ¥5 000 000 per QALY gained. RF RDN was projected to reduce clinical events (10-year relative risks: 0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, and 0.75 for heart failure). Over lifetime, RF RDN added 0.36 QALYs at the incremental cost of ¥923 723, resulting in an ICER of ¥2 565 236 per QALY gained. Under the assumption of added night-time benefit, the ICER decreased to ¥2 155 895 per QALY. Cost-effectiveness findings were robust across all tested scenarios. The findings of this model-based analysis suggest that RF RDN can provide meaningful clinical event reductions and is a cost-effective treatment option in the Japanese healthcare system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
期刊最新文献
Rationale and Design of a Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study of Esaxerenone Versus Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Older Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension on Calcium Channel Blocker Monotherapy (ESCORT-HT). Renal Denervation: New Evidence Supporting Long-Term Efficacy, Alternative Access Routes, and Cost-Effectiveness. Obesity, aldosterone excess, and mineralocorticoid receptor activation: Parallel or intersected circumstances? Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Arterial Hypertension: 10-Year Real-World Follow-Up Data. Association between Pan-Immune Inflammation Value and Sarcopenia in Hypertensive Patients, NHANES 1999-2018.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1