COVID-19 大流行期间远程医疗在眼科护理中的应用:回顾患者和医生的观点。

Christina Perjuhi Halajyan, Jonathan Thomas, Benjamin Xu, Jeffrey Gluckstein, Xuejuan Jiang
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行期间远程医疗在眼科护理中的应用:回顾患者和医生的观点。","authors":"Christina Perjuhi Halajyan, Jonathan Thomas, Benjamin Xu, Jeffrey Gluckstein, Xuejuan Jiang","doi":"10.1101/2024.10.25.24316160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There has been an increase in the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review used systematic search and review criteria to assess the literature on patient and physician perspectives toward telemedicine for vision care during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using relevant MeSH terms to identify peer-reviewed studies examining telemedicine use in eye care during the pandemic. The search strategy encompassed three key concepts: COVID-19 or pandemic, telehealth or telemedicine, and eye care. Further screening of references and similar articles was conducted to identify additional relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 24 relevant studies published between 2020 and 2022. Of these, 15 focused on patients' perspectives, while 12 explored physicians' perspectives. Predominantly cross-sectional in design, these studies were mainly conducted during the initial wave of the pandemic (March 2020 to June 2020), primarily in urban locations and hospital settings. Patients were satisfied with telemedicine and considered it equally effective to in-person visits. Patients believed telemedicine was convenient, improved eye care access, and a beneficial triage tool. Physicians acknowledged telemedicine's convenience for follow-up assessment and its ability to expand the capacity for emergency cases. However, both patients and physicians voiced concerns about the absence of ancillary examination and technological challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review highlights the positive impact of telemedicine in eye care during the pandemic. Nonetheless, most studies were limited in sample size. They did not delve into potential disparities based on race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location, factors that could influence patient attitudes toward telemedicine. Further research is warranted to validate the findings from our selected studies and explore factors that influence the implementation of telemedicine, particularly across various eye care subspecialties.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine in Eye Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Patient & Physician Perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Perjuhi Halajyan, Jonathan Thomas, Benjamin Xu, Jeffrey Gluckstein, Xuejuan Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.10.25.24316160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There has been an increase in the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review used systematic search and review criteria to assess the literature on patient and physician perspectives toward telemedicine for vision care during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using relevant MeSH terms to identify peer-reviewed studies examining telemedicine use in eye care during the pandemic. The search strategy encompassed three key concepts: COVID-19 or pandemic, telehealth or telemedicine, and eye care. Further screening of references and similar articles was conducted to identify additional relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 24 relevant studies published between 2020 and 2022. Of these, 15 focused on patients' perspectives, while 12 explored physicians' perspectives. Predominantly cross-sectional in design, these studies were mainly conducted during the initial wave of the pandemic (March 2020 to June 2020), primarily in urban locations and hospital settings. Patients were satisfied with telemedicine and considered it equally effective to in-person visits. Patients believed telemedicine was convenient, improved eye care access, and a beneficial triage tool. Physicians acknowledged telemedicine's convenience for follow-up assessment and its ability to expand the capacity for emergency cases. However, both patients and physicians voiced concerns about the absence of ancillary examination and technological challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review highlights the positive impact of telemedicine in eye care during the pandemic. Nonetheless, most studies were limited in sample size. They did not delve into potential disparities based on race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location, factors that could influence patient attitudes toward telemedicine. Further research is warranted to validate the findings from our selected studies and explore factors that influence the implementation of telemedicine, particularly across various eye care subspecialties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537333/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.25.24316160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.25.24316160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,采用远程医疗的人数有所增加。本综述采用系统检索和综述标准,评估了大流行期间患者和医生对远程医疗用于视力保健的看法:我们使用相关的 MeSH 术语在 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 上进行了全面搜索,以确定同行评审的研究,这些研究探讨了大流行期间远程医疗在眼科护理中的应用。搜索策略包括三个关键概念:COVID-19 或大流行、远程保健或远程医疗以及眼科护理。我们还进一步筛选了参考文献和类似文章,以确定更多相关研究:结果:我们确定了 2020 年至 2022 年间发表的 24 项相关研究。其中,15 项研究侧重于患者的观点,12 项研究探讨了医生的观点。这些研究以横断面设计为主,主要在大流行的最初阶段(2020 年 3 月至 2020 年 6 月)进行,主要在城市地区和医院环境中进行。患者对远程医疗感到满意,认为其与面对面就诊同样有效。患者认为远程医疗很方便,改善了眼科护理的可及性,是一种有益的分诊工具。医生承认远程医疗便于进行后续评估,并能扩大急诊病例的处理能力。然而,患者和医生都对缺乏辅助检查和技术挑战表示担忧:我们的综述强调了大流行期间远程医疗对眼科护理的积极影响。然而,大多数研究的样本量有限。这些研究没有深入探讨基于种族/民族、社会经济地位和地理位置的潜在差异,而这些因素可能会影响患者对远程医疗的态度。为了验证我们所选研究的结果,并探索影响远程医疗实施的因素,尤其是不同眼科护理亚专科的影响因素,我们有必要开展进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telemedicine in Eye Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Patient & Physician Perspectives.

Purpose: There has been an increase in the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review used systematic search and review criteria to assess the literature on patient and physician perspectives toward telemedicine for vision care during the pandemic.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using relevant MeSH terms to identify peer-reviewed studies examining telemedicine use in eye care during the pandemic. The search strategy encompassed three key concepts: COVID-19 or pandemic, telehealth or telemedicine, and eye care. Further screening of references and similar articles was conducted to identify additional relevant studies.

Results: We identified 24 relevant studies published between 2020 and 2022. Of these, 15 focused on patients' perspectives, while 12 explored physicians' perspectives. Predominantly cross-sectional in design, these studies were mainly conducted during the initial wave of the pandemic (March 2020 to June 2020), primarily in urban locations and hospital settings. Patients were satisfied with telemedicine and considered it equally effective to in-person visits. Patients believed telemedicine was convenient, improved eye care access, and a beneficial triage tool. Physicians acknowledged telemedicine's convenience for follow-up assessment and its ability to expand the capacity for emergency cases. However, both patients and physicians voiced concerns about the absence of ancillary examination and technological challenges.

Conclusion: Our review highlights the positive impact of telemedicine in eye care during the pandemic. Nonetheless, most studies were limited in sample size. They did not delve into potential disparities based on race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location, factors that could influence patient attitudes toward telemedicine. Further research is warranted to validate the findings from our selected studies and explore factors that influence the implementation of telemedicine, particularly across various eye care subspecialties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opioids Diminish the Placebo Antidepressant Response: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Ketamine Trial. Raising awareness of potential biases in medical machine learning: Experience from a Datathon. Prediction of Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults from Preoperative Cognition and Occipital Alpha Power from Resting-State Electroencephalogram. Reduced Cortical Excitability is Associated with Cognitive Symptoms in Concussed Adolescent Football Players. Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor BHLHE22 monoallelic and biallelic variants cause a neurodevelopmental disorder with agenesis of the corpus callosum, intellectual disability, tone and movement abnormalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1