在门诊宫腔镜手术中使用利多卡因热凝胶止痛的多中心研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.041
Laura Nieto-Pascual , Maite López-Yarto , Mauricio Agüero Mariño , Sonia Martínez García , Gregorio López González , Jessica Navarrete Domínguez , Carlota García-Salmones González , Pilar Lafuente González , Margalida Esperança Sastre Cuadri , Jorge Peñaloza Bustamante , Alejandro Doménech , Elisabet Augé , Mercedes Andeyro García
{"title":"在门诊宫腔镜手术中使用利多卡因热凝胶止痛的多中心研究","authors":"Laura Nieto-Pascual ,&nbsp;Maite López-Yarto ,&nbsp;Mauricio Agüero Mariño ,&nbsp;Sonia Martínez García ,&nbsp;Gregorio López González ,&nbsp;Jessica Navarrete Domínguez ,&nbsp;Carlota García-Salmones González ,&nbsp;Pilar Lafuente González ,&nbsp;Margalida Esperança Sastre Cuadri ,&nbsp;Jorge Peñaloza Bustamante ,&nbsp;Alejandro Doménech ,&nbsp;Elisabet Augé ,&nbsp;Mercedes Andeyro García","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to explore the use of an anesthetic lidocaine thermogel in outpatient operative hysteroscopies. Specifically, it assessed the safety, tolerability, and ease of use of the gel, as well as its potential for pain reduction during the procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This was a multicenter observational study conducted in 9 gynecological units between March 2023 and January 2024. The study included adult women scheduled for outpatient operative hysteroscopies, excluding those with hypersensitivity to the product or recent participation in other clinical studies. The target sample size was 60 to account for potential dropouts. Data collection was electronic, and SPSS was used for analysis. The study assessed visibility conditions, procedure duration, pain scores at different stages of the procedure, and adverse event frequency. Statistical analyses utilized descriptive statistics, Student’s t-tests, Wilcoxon and Friedman tests, and Chi-Square or Fisher tests as appropriate. Binary logistic regression was applied to identify factors influencing gel volume.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All 60 participants met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 45.5 (SD 8.8) years, with a mean BMI of 27.0 (SD 5.6) kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Medical histories were reported in 46.7% of participants, and 50% had undergone previous gynecological surgeries. Prior to the procedure, 51.8% of participants took analgesics. The average procedure duration was 13.9 (SD 15.1) minutes. Pain scores were collected at different stages of the procedure, with median VAS scores ranging from 0 to 5 out of 10. In 50% of cases, the quality of vision during the procedure was rated 9 or higher on a 10-point scale. The full recommended dose of thermogel was administered in 91.7% of cases. The mean gel volume used was 7.0 (SD 1.9) milliliters. Regression analysis showed that younger age and a history of abortions or childbirth were significantly associated with higher gel volume use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The anesthetic thermogel demonstrated effectiveness in managing pain during outpatient operative hysteroscopies, with median pain scores ranging from 0 to 5 out of 10 across different stages of the procedure. The gel showed a favorable safety profile, with only 15% of participants reporting adverse effects, all of which were minor and resolved satisfactorily. The high rate of complete gel application (91.7% of cases) and positive physician feedback suggest good tolerability and ease of use. Further research is recommended to evaluate the gel’s efficacy in other gynecological procedures and to optimize application protocols based on patient-specific factors such as age and reproductive history.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"303 ","pages":"Pages 230-235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multi-center study on the use of lidocaine thermogel for pain control in outpatient operative hysteroscopy\",\"authors\":\"Laura Nieto-Pascual ,&nbsp;Maite López-Yarto ,&nbsp;Mauricio Agüero Mariño ,&nbsp;Sonia Martínez García ,&nbsp;Gregorio López González ,&nbsp;Jessica Navarrete Domínguez ,&nbsp;Carlota García-Salmones González ,&nbsp;Pilar Lafuente González ,&nbsp;Margalida Esperança Sastre Cuadri ,&nbsp;Jorge Peñaloza Bustamante ,&nbsp;Alejandro Doménech ,&nbsp;Elisabet Augé ,&nbsp;Mercedes Andeyro García\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to explore the use of an anesthetic lidocaine thermogel in outpatient operative hysteroscopies. Specifically, it assessed the safety, tolerability, and ease of use of the gel, as well as its potential for pain reduction during the procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This was a multicenter observational study conducted in 9 gynecological units between March 2023 and January 2024. The study included adult women scheduled for outpatient operative hysteroscopies, excluding those with hypersensitivity to the product or recent participation in other clinical studies. The target sample size was 60 to account for potential dropouts. Data collection was electronic, and SPSS was used for analysis. The study assessed visibility conditions, procedure duration, pain scores at different stages of the procedure, and adverse event frequency. Statistical analyses utilized descriptive statistics, Student’s t-tests, Wilcoxon and Friedman tests, and Chi-Square or Fisher tests as appropriate. Binary logistic regression was applied to identify factors influencing gel volume.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All 60 participants met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 45.5 (SD 8.8) years, with a mean BMI of 27.0 (SD 5.6) kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Medical histories were reported in 46.7% of participants, and 50% had undergone previous gynecological surgeries. Prior to the procedure, 51.8% of participants took analgesics. The average procedure duration was 13.9 (SD 15.1) minutes. Pain scores were collected at different stages of the procedure, with median VAS scores ranging from 0 to 5 out of 10. In 50% of cases, the quality of vision during the procedure was rated 9 or higher on a 10-point scale. The full recommended dose of thermogel was administered in 91.7% of cases. The mean gel volume used was 7.0 (SD 1.9) milliliters. Regression analysis showed that younger age and a history of abortions or childbirth were significantly associated with higher gel volume use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The anesthetic thermogel demonstrated effectiveness in managing pain during outpatient operative hysteroscopies, with median pain scores ranging from 0 to 5 out of 10 across different stages of the procedure. The gel showed a favorable safety profile, with only 15% of participants reporting adverse effects, all of which were minor and resolved satisfactorily. The high rate of complete gel application (91.7% of cases) and positive physician feedback suggest good tolerability and ease of use. Further research is recommended to evaluate the gel’s efficacy in other gynecological procedures and to optimize application protocols based on patient-specific factors such as age and reproductive history.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"volume\":\"303 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 230-235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030121152400589X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030121152400589X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:本研究旨在探讨利多卡因热凝胶麻醉剂在门诊宫腔镜手术中的应用。研究设计这是一项多中心观察性研究,于 2023 年 3 月至 2024 年 1 月期间在 9 个妇科单位进行。研究对象包括计划在门诊进行宫腔镜手术的成年女性,不包括对该产品过敏或最近参加过其他临床研究的女性。目标样本量为 60 个,以考虑到可能出现的辍学情况。数据收集采用电子方式,并使用 SPSS 进行分析。研究评估了可见性条件、手术持续时间、手术不同阶段的疼痛评分以及不良事件发生频率。统计分析采用了描述性统计、学生 t 检验、Wilcoxon 和 Friedman 检验以及 Chi-Square 或 Fisher 检验(视情况而定)。二元逻辑回归用于确定影响凝胶体积的因素。平均年龄为 45.5 (SD 8.8) 岁,平均体重指数为 27.0 (SD 5.6) kg/m2。46.7%的参与者有病史,50%的参与者曾接受过妇科手术。手术前,51.8%的参与者服用了镇痛剂。手术平均持续时间为 13.9 分钟(标准差 15.1 分钟)。在手术的不同阶段收集了疼痛评分,VAS评分的中位数从0到5分不等(满分10分)。在 50% 的病例中,手术过程中的视觉质量在 10 分制中被评为 9 分或更高。91.7%的病例使用了全部推荐剂量的热凝胶。平均凝胶用量为 7.0 毫升(标准差 1.9 毫升)。回归分析表明,较年轻的年龄和流产史或分娩史与较高的凝胶使用量有明显关联。结论麻醉热凝胶在门诊宫腔镜手术过程中有效控制了疼痛,在手术的不同阶段,疼痛评分的中位数从0到5分不等(满分10分)。凝胶显示出良好的安全性,只有15%的参与者报告了不良反应,所有不良反应都很轻微,并得到了满意的解决。凝胶的完全涂抹率很高(91.7% 的病例),医生的反馈也很积极,这表明凝胶具有良好的耐受性,而且易于使用。建议进一步开展研究,评估凝胶在其他妇科手术中的疗效,并根据患者的年龄和生育史等特定因素优化使用方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A multi-center study on the use of lidocaine thermogel for pain control in outpatient operative hysteroscopy

Objectives

This study aimed to explore the use of an anesthetic lidocaine thermogel in outpatient operative hysteroscopies. Specifically, it assessed the safety, tolerability, and ease of use of the gel, as well as its potential for pain reduction during the procedure.

Study design

This was a multicenter observational study conducted in 9 gynecological units between March 2023 and January 2024. The study included adult women scheduled for outpatient operative hysteroscopies, excluding those with hypersensitivity to the product or recent participation in other clinical studies. The target sample size was 60 to account for potential dropouts. Data collection was electronic, and SPSS was used for analysis. The study assessed visibility conditions, procedure duration, pain scores at different stages of the procedure, and adverse event frequency. Statistical analyses utilized descriptive statistics, Student’s t-tests, Wilcoxon and Friedman tests, and Chi-Square or Fisher tests as appropriate. Binary logistic regression was applied to identify factors influencing gel volume.

Results

All 60 participants met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 45.5 (SD 8.8) years, with a mean BMI of 27.0 (SD 5.6) kg/m2. Medical histories were reported in 46.7% of participants, and 50% had undergone previous gynecological surgeries. Prior to the procedure, 51.8% of participants took analgesics. The average procedure duration was 13.9 (SD 15.1) minutes. Pain scores were collected at different stages of the procedure, with median VAS scores ranging from 0 to 5 out of 10. In 50% of cases, the quality of vision during the procedure was rated 9 or higher on a 10-point scale. The full recommended dose of thermogel was administered in 91.7% of cases. The mean gel volume used was 7.0 (SD 1.9) milliliters. Regression analysis showed that younger age and a history of abortions or childbirth were significantly associated with higher gel volume use.

Conclusions

The anesthetic thermogel demonstrated effectiveness in managing pain during outpatient operative hysteroscopies, with median pain scores ranging from 0 to 5 out of 10 across different stages of the procedure. The gel showed a favorable safety profile, with only 15% of participants reporting adverse effects, all of which were minor and resolved satisfactorily. The high rate of complete gel application (91.7% of cases) and positive physician feedback suggest good tolerability and ease of use. Further research is recommended to evaluate the gel’s efficacy in other gynecological procedures and to optimize application protocols based on patient-specific factors such as age and reproductive history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Mode of delivery predicts postpartum maternal leukocyte telomere length" [Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 300 (2024) 224-229]. Corrigendum to “Recombinant-Luteinzing hormone supplementation in women during IVF/ICSI cycles with GnRH-antagonist protocol: A systematic review and meta-analysis” [Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 283 (2023) 43–48] Comparative study on the effects of combined oral contraceptives and dienogest in women with endometriosis‑associated chronic pelvic pain Severe uterine haemorrhagic complications from gestational trophoblastic neoplasia Prediction of perinatal mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: A post hoc analysis of the Dutch STRIDER trial to predict perinatal mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1