毒性生命周期影响评估方法的比较分析:中国土壤修复技术案例研究

IF 7.1 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c05888
Siqi Zhao, Gaoxiang Zhang, Han Cui, Jianxin Yang, Ning Ding
{"title":"毒性生命周期影响评估方法的比较分析:中国土壤修复技术案例研究","authors":"Siqi Zhao, Gaoxiang Zhang, Han Cui, Jianxin Yang, Ning Ding","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c05888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Toxic impacts arising from soil pollution pose considerable risks to the environment and to human health. The life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) distinguishes between ecotoxicity and human toxicity, based on the contamination medium. This study compared six LCIA methodologies for assessing toxicity and implemented them in evaluating soil contamination remediation, thus revealing differences in the methodological logic and characterization factors (CFs). The LCIA methodologies in soil remediation assessments highlighted significant effects from heavy metal and inorganic emissions. The ecotoxicity analysis, employing IMPACT 2002+, TRACI 2.1, and USEtox 2.12, found that emissions of heavy metals, particularly zinc, were notably influential. In terms of human toxicity, the carcinogenic effects were substantially higher than noncarcinogenic effects, with contributions from ReCiPe 2016 and TRACI 2.1 amounting to 99.734% and 99.517%, respectively. Varied results in toxicity assessments across different LCIA methodologies likely stem from disparities in model logic and CFs, limitations of LCIA models, and differences in toxicity categorization. This research strongly supports the further development and refinement of LCIA methodologies and the strategic choice of toxicity assessment methods across various industrial settings.","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodologies for Toxicity: A Case Study of Soil Remediation Technology in China\",\"authors\":\"Siqi Zhao, Gaoxiang Zhang, Han Cui, Jianxin Yang, Ning Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c05888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Toxic impacts arising from soil pollution pose considerable risks to the environment and to human health. The life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) distinguishes between ecotoxicity and human toxicity, based on the contamination medium. This study compared six LCIA methodologies for assessing toxicity and implemented them in evaluating soil contamination remediation, thus revealing differences in the methodological logic and characterization factors (CFs). The LCIA methodologies in soil remediation assessments highlighted significant effects from heavy metal and inorganic emissions. The ecotoxicity analysis, employing IMPACT 2002+, TRACI 2.1, and USEtox 2.12, found that emissions of heavy metals, particularly zinc, were notably influential. In terms of human toxicity, the carcinogenic effects were substantially higher than noncarcinogenic effects, with contributions from ReCiPe 2016 and TRACI 2.1 amounting to 99.734% and 99.517%, respectively. Varied results in toxicity assessments across different LCIA methodologies likely stem from disparities in model logic and CFs, limitations of LCIA models, and differences in toxicity categorization. This research strongly supports the further development and refinement of LCIA methodologies and the strategic choice of toxicity assessment methods across various industrial settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":25,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c05888\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c05888","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤污染产生的毒性影响对环境和人类健康构成了巨大风险。生命周期影响评估(LCIA)根据污染介质区分了生态毒性和人类毒性。本研究比较了六种评估毒性的 LCIA 方法,并将其应用于土壤污染修复评估,从而揭示了方法逻辑和表征因子(CFs)的差异。用于土壤修复评估的 LCIA 方法突出了重金属和无机排放物的显著影响。采用 IMPACT 2002+、TRACI 2.1 和 USEtox 2.12 进行的生态毒性分析发现,重金属排放,尤其是锌,具有显著的影响。在人类毒性方面,致癌效应大大高于非致癌效应,ReCiPe 2016 和 TRACI 2.1 的贡献率分别为 99.734% 和 99.517%。不同 LCIA 方法的毒性评估结果各不相同,这可能是由于模型逻辑和 CF 的差异、LCIA 模型的局限性以及毒性分类的不同造成的。这项研究有力地支持了 LCIA 方法的进一步发展和完善,以及在各种工业环境中对毒性评估方法的战略性选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodologies for Toxicity: A Case Study of Soil Remediation Technology in China
Toxic impacts arising from soil pollution pose considerable risks to the environment and to human health. The life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) distinguishes between ecotoxicity and human toxicity, based on the contamination medium. This study compared six LCIA methodologies for assessing toxicity and implemented them in evaluating soil contamination remediation, thus revealing differences in the methodological logic and characterization factors (CFs). The LCIA methodologies in soil remediation assessments highlighted significant effects from heavy metal and inorganic emissions. The ecotoxicity analysis, employing IMPACT 2002+, TRACI 2.1, and USEtox 2.12, found that emissions of heavy metals, particularly zinc, were notably influential. In terms of human toxicity, the carcinogenic effects were substantially higher than noncarcinogenic effects, with contributions from ReCiPe 2016 and TRACI 2.1 amounting to 99.734% and 99.517%, respectively. Varied results in toxicity assessments across different LCIA methodologies likely stem from disparities in model logic and CFs, limitations of LCIA models, and differences in toxicity categorization. This research strongly supports the further development and refinement of LCIA methodologies and the strategic choice of toxicity assessment methods across various industrial settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1470
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment. The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodologies for Toxicity: A Case Study of Soil Remediation Technology in China Is It Possible to Make Magnesia-Based Cement Environmentally Friendly? Valorization of Polycaprolactone to γ-Caprolactone over Lewis Acidic Ionic Liquids Enhanced Carbon Sequestration of Sustainable Biochar via Metal Salt Regulation: Insight into Reaction Mechanism and Carbon Footprint Lignin-Based Functional Hydrogels: An Eco-friendly Bulk Material
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1