中国东北农村地区劳动年龄癫痫患者长期苯巴比妥治疗有效:一项为期 10 年的随访研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2024-10-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1429964
Rongxin Li, Danyang Zhao, Nan Li, Weihong Lin
{"title":"中国东北农村地区劳动年龄癫痫患者长期苯巴比妥治疗有效:一项为期 10 年的随访研究。","authors":"Rongxin Li, Danyang Zhao, Nan Li, Weihong Lin","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2024.1429964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective management of epilepsy in working-age patients is essential to reduce the burden on individuals, families, and communities. This study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy of phenobarbital (PB) in working-age patients with epilepsy in rural Northeast China and identify the risk factors for seizures during treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 18-65 years diagnosed with convulsive epilepsy in rural areas of Jilin Province between 2010 and 2024 were included, and demographic and clinical data were recorded. Seizure frequency, self-efficacy, adherence, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed monthly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3,568 participants, 288 (8.1%) withdrew from the study and 159 (4.5%) died. During the first year of treatment, 75.2% of patients experienced a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency compared with baseline (considered as treatment effectiveness); 53.7% of patients were seizure-free. By the tenth year, 97.7% of patients showed treatment effectiveness, and 89.6% were seizure-free. Self-efficacy was improved in 37.8% of patients in the first year and in 72% of patients by the tenth year. The independent risk factors for seizures during treatment were higher baseline seizure frequency [odds ratio (OR) = 1.431, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.122-1.824], presence of multiple seizure types (OR = 1.367, 95% CI: 1.023-1.826), and poor adherence (OR = 14.806, 95% CI: 3.495-62.725), with significant differences observed in the first, third, and fifth years. The most commonly reported AEs were drowsiness (43.3%), dizziness (25.0%), and headaches (17.0%), most of which were mild and decreased over time. Age at enrollment was the only factor influencing withdrawal (hazard ratio = 0.984, 95% CI: 0.973-0.996, <i>p</i> = 0.010), with a substantial number of patients who withdrew (32.6%) relocating for work. Cardiovascular disease was the primary cause of death, and age at enrollment was the only risk factor (hazard ratio = 1.026, 95% CI: 1.009-1.043, <i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Working-age adults with epilepsy demonstrated a favorable response and tolerability to PB monotherapy. Baseline seizure frequency, seizure type, and adherence consistently predicted prognosis throughout the treatment period. Withdrawal was mainly explained by work-related pressures in this age group. Therefore, it is essential to implement interventions that support patient adherence to therapy and maintain stable regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1429964"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term phenobarbital treatment is effective in working-age patients with epilepsy in rural Northeast China: a 10-year follow-up study.\",\"authors\":\"Rongxin Li, Danyang Zhao, Nan Li, Weihong Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fneur.2024.1429964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective management of epilepsy in working-age patients is essential to reduce the burden on individuals, families, and communities. This study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy of phenobarbital (PB) in working-age patients with epilepsy in rural Northeast China and identify the risk factors for seizures during treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 18-65 years diagnosed with convulsive epilepsy in rural areas of Jilin Province between 2010 and 2024 were included, and demographic and clinical data were recorded. Seizure frequency, self-efficacy, adherence, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed monthly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3,568 participants, 288 (8.1%) withdrew from the study and 159 (4.5%) died. During the first year of treatment, 75.2% of patients experienced a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency compared with baseline (considered as treatment effectiveness); 53.7% of patients were seizure-free. By the tenth year, 97.7% of patients showed treatment effectiveness, and 89.6% were seizure-free. Self-efficacy was improved in 37.8% of patients in the first year and in 72% of patients by the tenth year. The independent risk factors for seizures during treatment were higher baseline seizure frequency [odds ratio (OR) = 1.431, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.122-1.824], presence of multiple seizure types (OR = 1.367, 95% CI: 1.023-1.826), and poor adherence (OR = 14.806, 95% CI: 3.495-62.725), with significant differences observed in the first, third, and fifth years. The most commonly reported AEs were drowsiness (43.3%), dizziness (25.0%), and headaches (17.0%), most of which were mild and decreased over time. Age at enrollment was the only factor influencing withdrawal (hazard ratio = 0.984, 95% CI: 0.973-0.996, <i>p</i> = 0.010), with a substantial number of patients who withdrew (32.6%) relocating for work. Cardiovascular disease was the primary cause of death, and age at enrollment was the only risk factor (hazard ratio = 1.026, 95% CI: 1.009-1.043, <i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Working-age adults with epilepsy demonstrated a favorable response and tolerability to PB monotherapy. Baseline seizure frequency, seizure type, and adherence consistently predicted prognosis throughout the treatment period. Withdrawal was mainly explained by work-related pressures in this age group. Therefore, it is essential to implement interventions that support patient adherence to therapy and maintain stable regimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1429964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538064/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1429964\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1429964","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:为减轻个人、家庭和社区的负担,有效控制工龄癫痫患者的病情至关重要。本研究旨在评估苯巴比妥(PB)对中国东北农村地区劳动年龄癫痫患者的长期疗效,并确定治疗期间癫痫发作的风险因素:方法:纳入2010年至2024年吉林省农村地区确诊的18-65岁抽搐性癫痫患者,记录人口统计学和临床数据。每月评估癫痫发作频率、自我效能、依从性和不良事件(AEs):在 3,568 名参与者中,288 人(8.1%)退出了研究,159 人(4.5%)死亡。在治疗的第一年,75.2%的患者癫痫发作频率比基线降低了≥50%(视为治疗有效);53.7%的患者无癫痫发作。到第十年,97.7%的患者显示治疗有效,89.6%的患者无癫痫发作。37.8%的患者在第一年提高了自我效能,72%的患者在第十年提高了自我效能。治疗期间癫痫发作的独立风险因素是较高的基线发作频率[几率比(OR)= 1.431,95% 置信区间(CI):1.122-1.824]、多种发作类型(OR = 1.367,95% CI:1.023-1.826)和依从性差(OR = 14.806,95% CI:3.495-62.725),在第一年、第三年和第五年观察到显著差异。最常报告的不良反应是嗜睡(43.3%)、头晕(25.0%)和头痛(17.0%),其中大多数为轻微不良反应,且随时间推移而减轻。入选时的年龄是影响退出治疗的唯一因素(危险比 = 0.984,95% CI:0.973-0.996,p = 0.010),退出治疗的患者中有相当一部分(32.6%)因工作原因而搬迁。心血管疾病是死亡的主要原因,而入院时的年龄是唯一的风险因素(危险比 = 1.026,95% CI:1.009-1.043,p = 0.002):讨论:工作年龄段的成人癫痫患者对PB单药治疗有良好的反应和耐受性。基线发作频率、发作类型和依从性始终预示着整个治疗期间的预后。在这个年龄组中,停药的主要原因是与工作有关的压力。因此,采取干预措施支持患者坚持治疗并维持稳定的治疗方案至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term phenobarbital treatment is effective in working-age patients with epilepsy in rural Northeast China: a 10-year follow-up study.

Introduction: Effective management of epilepsy in working-age patients is essential to reduce the burden on individuals, families, and communities. This study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy of phenobarbital (PB) in working-age patients with epilepsy in rural Northeast China and identify the risk factors for seizures during treatment.

Methods: Patients aged 18-65 years diagnosed with convulsive epilepsy in rural areas of Jilin Province between 2010 and 2024 were included, and demographic and clinical data were recorded. Seizure frequency, self-efficacy, adherence, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed monthly.

Results: Of the 3,568 participants, 288 (8.1%) withdrew from the study and 159 (4.5%) died. During the first year of treatment, 75.2% of patients experienced a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency compared with baseline (considered as treatment effectiveness); 53.7% of patients were seizure-free. By the tenth year, 97.7% of patients showed treatment effectiveness, and 89.6% were seizure-free. Self-efficacy was improved in 37.8% of patients in the first year and in 72% of patients by the tenth year. The independent risk factors for seizures during treatment were higher baseline seizure frequency [odds ratio (OR) = 1.431, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.122-1.824], presence of multiple seizure types (OR = 1.367, 95% CI: 1.023-1.826), and poor adherence (OR = 14.806, 95% CI: 3.495-62.725), with significant differences observed in the first, third, and fifth years. The most commonly reported AEs were drowsiness (43.3%), dizziness (25.0%), and headaches (17.0%), most of which were mild and decreased over time. Age at enrollment was the only factor influencing withdrawal (hazard ratio = 0.984, 95% CI: 0.973-0.996, p = 0.010), with a substantial number of patients who withdrew (32.6%) relocating for work. Cardiovascular disease was the primary cause of death, and age at enrollment was the only risk factor (hazard ratio = 1.026, 95% CI: 1.009-1.043, p = 0.002).

Discussion: Working-age adults with epilepsy demonstrated a favorable response and tolerability to PB monotherapy. Baseline seizure frequency, seizure type, and adherence consistently predicted prognosis throughout the treatment period. Withdrawal was mainly explained by work-related pressures in this age group. Therefore, it is essential to implement interventions that support patient adherence to therapy and maintain stable regimens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
期刊最新文献
Association between platelet-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and future stroke risk: a national cohort study based on CHARLS. Biopsychosocial rehabilitation therapy in small fiber neuropathy: research protocol to study the effect of rehabilitation treatment. Causal associations of ischemic stroke, metabolic factors, and related medications with epilepsy: a Mendelian randomization study. Editorial: Sudden deafness. Evaluating the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the performance-oriented mobility assessment among patients with chronic stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1