机器人辅助技术可在四角融合术中准确放置螺钉并降低手术难度:一项尸体研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05213-w
Zhixin Wang, Bo Liu, Zhe Yi, Ke Xu, Shijie Jia, Qianqian Wang, Yaobin Yin
{"title":"机器人辅助技术可在四角融合术中准确放置螺钉并降低手术难度:一项尸体研究。","authors":"Zhixin Wang, Bo Liu, Zhe Yi, Ke Xu, Shijie Jia, Qianqian Wang, Yaobin Yin","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05213-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility and accuracy of a robot-assisted technique in four-corner fusion compared with traditional freehand operation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty cadaver specimens were randomly assigned to the robot-assisted group and freehand groups. Three screws were placed percutaneously to fix the capitate-lunate joint, lunate-triquetrum joint, and triquetrum-hamate-capitate joint in each specimen by robot-assisted or freehand technique. The offset between the actual and planned screw positions was determined by merging the images of intraoperative and postoperative CT scans in the robot-assisted group. The centrality of the screw, time-consuming, drilling attempts, and radiation exposure were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean offset between the actual and planned screw position was 1.09 (SD: 0.56) mm. The offset at the start point of the screw was significantly lower than that at the endpoint. There was no significant difference in the centrality of the screws, surgical time between the two groups. The number of drilling attempts and the radiation dose received by surgeons were significantly lower in the robot-assisted group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there was no significant difference in screw centrality between the two groups, the slight offset between the actual and planned screw positions confirmed the feasibility of the robot-assisted technique in four-corner fusion. The robot-assisted technique has advantages in reducing the difficulty of surgery and protecting the surgeon from exposure to large doses of radiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"724"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-assisted technique can achieve accurate screw placement in four-corner fusion and reduce operative difficulty: a cadaver study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhixin Wang, Bo Liu, Zhe Yi, Ke Xu, Shijie Jia, Qianqian Wang, Yaobin Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-024-05213-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility and accuracy of a robot-assisted technique in four-corner fusion compared with traditional freehand operation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty cadaver specimens were randomly assigned to the robot-assisted group and freehand groups. Three screws were placed percutaneously to fix the capitate-lunate joint, lunate-triquetrum joint, and triquetrum-hamate-capitate joint in each specimen by robot-assisted or freehand technique. The offset between the actual and planned screw positions was determined by merging the images of intraoperative and postoperative CT scans in the robot-assisted group. The centrality of the screw, time-consuming, drilling attempts, and radiation exposure were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean offset between the actual and planned screw position was 1.09 (SD: 0.56) mm. The offset at the start point of the screw was significantly lower than that at the endpoint. There was no significant difference in the centrality of the screws, surgical time between the two groups. The number of drilling attempts and the radiation dose received by surgeons were significantly lower in the robot-assisted group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there was no significant difference in screw centrality between the two groups, the slight offset between the actual and planned screw positions confirmed the feasibility of the robot-assisted technique in four-corner fusion. The robot-assisted technique has advantages in reducing the difficulty of surgery and protecting the surgeon from exposure to large doses of radiation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542212/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05213-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05213-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在探讨机器人辅助四角融合技术与传统徒手操作相比的可行性和准确性:本研究旨在探讨机器人辅助四角融合技术与传统徒手操作相比的可行性和准确性:方法:20 具尸体标本被随机分配到机器人辅助组和徒手组。采用机器人辅助或徒手技术,经皮放置三枚螺钉,分别固定每个标本的头帽-月骨关节、月骨-三喙突关节和三喙突-肱骨-头帽关节。机器人辅助组通过合并术中和术后 CT 扫描图像确定螺钉实际位置与计划位置之间的偏移。对两组患者的螺钉中心度、耗时、钻孔尝试和辐射暴露进行了比较:实际螺钉位置与计划螺钉位置的平均偏移量为 1.09 毫米(标度:0.56)。螺钉起点的偏移量明显低于终点。两组患者的螺钉中心度和手术时间没有明显差异。机器人辅助组的钻孔次数和外科医生接受的辐射剂量明显较低:虽然两组螺钉中心度没有明显差异,但实际螺钉位置与计划螺钉位置之间的轻微偏移证实了机器人辅助技术在四角融合中的可行性。机器人辅助技术在降低手术难度和保护外科医生免受大剂量辐射方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robot-assisted technique can achieve accurate screw placement in four-corner fusion and reduce operative difficulty: a cadaver study.

Background: The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility and accuracy of a robot-assisted technique in four-corner fusion compared with traditional freehand operation.

Methods: Twenty cadaver specimens were randomly assigned to the robot-assisted group and freehand groups. Three screws were placed percutaneously to fix the capitate-lunate joint, lunate-triquetrum joint, and triquetrum-hamate-capitate joint in each specimen by robot-assisted or freehand technique. The offset between the actual and planned screw positions was determined by merging the images of intraoperative and postoperative CT scans in the robot-assisted group. The centrality of the screw, time-consuming, drilling attempts, and radiation exposure were compared between the two groups.

Results: The mean offset between the actual and planned screw position was 1.09 (SD: 0.56) mm. The offset at the start point of the screw was significantly lower than that at the endpoint. There was no significant difference in the centrality of the screws, surgical time between the two groups. The number of drilling attempts and the radiation dose received by surgeons were significantly lower in the robot-assisted group.

Conclusions: Although there was no significant difference in screw centrality between the two groups, the slight offset between the actual and planned screw positions confirmed the feasibility of the robot-assisted technique in four-corner fusion. The robot-assisted technique has advantages in reducing the difficulty of surgery and protecting the surgeon from exposure to large doses of radiation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
Exosomes secreted from human-derived adipose stem cells prevent progression of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Risk factors of short-term residual low back pain after PKP for the first thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Correction: Oblique lateral internal fusion combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in severe lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and radiographic outcome. Forearm bone mineral density as a predictor of adjacent vertebral refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a retrospective analysis. Global incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery in adolescents: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1