探索青少年避孕咨询:假设女儿的情景

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Patient Education and Counseling Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108486
Carmen Traseira Pedraz , Catherine Wong , Nirupama DeSilva , Megan Gribbons , Katelyn K. Jetelina , Jasmin A. Tiro , Jenny KR Francis
{"title":"探索青少年避孕咨询:假设女儿的情景","authors":"Carmen Traseira Pedraz ,&nbsp;Catherine Wong ,&nbsp;Nirupama DeSilva ,&nbsp;Megan Gribbons ,&nbsp;Katelyn K. Jetelina ,&nbsp;Jasmin A. Tiro ,&nbsp;Jenny KR Francis","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to describe contraceptive methods used by clinicians who counsel adolescents to create an aggregate perspective which could be shared with patients. We also explored which method clinicians would recommend to a hypothetical daughter to identify associations between clinicians who had used long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and potential recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An online survey was sent to pediatric and adolescent gynecology academic societies and fellowship/division directors to share with their clinicians. Frequency and percentage of self-reported personal/partner contraceptive method ever use was calculated. Bivariate tests evaluated the relationship between personal LARC use and contraception recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across 669 clinicians, 46 % reported personal/partner LARC use, and 77 % recommended LARC to a hypothetical daughter. LARC users were more likely to recommend LARC for a hypothetical daughter (89 % LARC users recommend it versus 66 % non-LARC users, p &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Results can support shared decision-making counseling discussions. When families ask, “what do you use” or “what would you start for your daughter,” clinicians might consider sharing this aggregate perspective.</div></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><div>In this study, clinicians who personally use LARC were more likely to recommend LARC for a hypothetical daughter. Clinicians can share this aggregate perspective to reduce personal bias during contraceptive counselling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 108486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring adolescent contraceptive counseling: A hypothetical daughter scenario\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Traseira Pedraz ,&nbsp;Catherine Wong ,&nbsp;Nirupama DeSilva ,&nbsp;Megan Gribbons ,&nbsp;Katelyn K. Jetelina ,&nbsp;Jasmin A. Tiro ,&nbsp;Jenny KR Francis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to describe contraceptive methods used by clinicians who counsel adolescents to create an aggregate perspective which could be shared with patients. We also explored which method clinicians would recommend to a hypothetical daughter to identify associations between clinicians who had used long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and potential recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An online survey was sent to pediatric and adolescent gynecology academic societies and fellowship/division directors to share with their clinicians. Frequency and percentage of self-reported personal/partner contraceptive method ever use was calculated. Bivariate tests evaluated the relationship between personal LARC use and contraception recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across 669 clinicians, 46 % reported personal/partner LARC use, and 77 % recommended LARC to a hypothetical daughter. LARC users were more likely to recommend LARC for a hypothetical daughter (89 % LARC users recommend it versus 66 % non-LARC users, p &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Results can support shared decision-making counseling discussions. When families ask, “what do you use” or “what would you start for your daughter,” clinicians might consider sharing this aggregate perspective.</div></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><div>In this study, clinicians who personally use LARC were more likely to recommend LARC for a hypothetical daughter. Clinicians can share this aggregate perspective to reduce personal bias during contraceptive counselling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399124003537\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399124003537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在描述为青少年提供咨询的临床医生所使用的避孕方法,从而建立一个可与患者分享的综合视角。我们还探讨了临床医生会向假设的女儿推荐哪种避孕方法,以确定使用过长效可逆避孕药(LARC)的临床医生与潜在建议之间的关联:向儿科和青春期妇科学术团体和研究员/科室主任发送了一份在线调查,以便与他们的临床医生分享。计算了自我报告的个人/伴侣曾经使用的避孕方法的频率和百分比。双变量检验评估了个人 LARC 使用情况与避孕建议之间的关系:在 669 名临床医生中,46% 的人报告了个人/伴侣使用 LARC 的情况,77% 的人向假设的女儿推荐 LARC。LARC 使用者更有可能向假设的女儿推荐 LARC(89% 的 LARC 使用者推荐 LARC,而 66% 的非 LARC 使用者推荐 LARC,p 结论: 结果可为共同决策咨询提供支持:结果可为共同决策咨询讨论提供支持。当家庭询问 "您使用什么 "或 "您会为您的女儿开始使用什么 "时,临床医生可以考虑分享这一综合观点:在这项研究中,亲自使用 LARC 的临床医生更有可能为假设的女儿推荐 LARC。临床医生可以分享这种综合观点,以减少避孕咨询过程中的个人偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring adolescent contraceptive counseling: A hypothetical daughter scenario

Objectives

We aimed to describe contraceptive methods used by clinicians who counsel adolescents to create an aggregate perspective which could be shared with patients. We also explored which method clinicians would recommend to a hypothetical daughter to identify associations between clinicians who had used long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and potential recommendations.

Methods

An online survey was sent to pediatric and adolescent gynecology academic societies and fellowship/division directors to share with their clinicians. Frequency and percentage of self-reported personal/partner contraceptive method ever use was calculated. Bivariate tests evaluated the relationship between personal LARC use and contraception recommendations.

Results

Across 669 clinicians, 46 % reported personal/partner LARC use, and 77 % recommended LARC to a hypothetical daughter. LARC users were more likely to recommend LARC for a hypothetical daughter (89 % LARC users recommend it versus 66 % non-LARC users, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Results can support shared decision-making counseling discussions. When families ask, “what do you use” or “what would you start for your daughter,” clinicians might consider sharing this aggregate perspective.

Practice implications

In this study, clinicians who personally use LARC were more likely to recommend LARC for a hypothetical daughter. Clinicians can share this aggregate perspective to reduce personal bias during contraceptive counselling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
期刊最新文献
Embedding an illustrator in the process of co-producing resources to enhance communication and shared decision-making for patients prescribed high-risk medication. Effect of fathers in Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on couple's preterm birth preparedness. Nonverbal behavior in telehealth visits: A narrative review. Effective remediation for advanced practice providers with lowest patient experience: The power of relational resources. Relative importance of "why" and "how" messages on medication behavior: Insights from construal level theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1