晚期黑色素瘤患者使用 Nivolumab 加 Ipilimumab 或 Nivolumab 单药的汇总长期疗效。

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1200/JCO.24.00400
Georgina V Long, James Larkin, Dirk Schadendorf, Jean-Jacques Grob, Christopher D Lao, Iván Márquez-Rodas, John Wagstaff, Céleste Lebbé, Jacopo Pigozzo, Caroline Robert, Paolo A Ascierto, Victoria Atkinson, Michael A Postow, Michael B Atkins, Mario Sznol, Margaret K Callahan, Suzanne L Topalian, Jeffrey A Sosman, Srividya Kotapati, Pratik K Thakkar, Corey Ritchings, Melanie Pe Benito, Sandra Re, Samira Soleymani, F Stephen Hodi
{"title":"晚期黑色素瘤患者使用 Nivolumab 加 Ipilimumab 或 Nivolumab 单药的汇总长期疗效。","authors":"Georgina V Long, James Larkin, Dirk Schadendorf, Jean-Jacques Grob, Christopher D Lao, Iván Márquez-Rodas, John Wagstaff, Céleste Lebbé, Jacopo Pigozzo, Caroline Robert, Paolo A Ascierto, Victoria Atkinson, Michael A Postow, Michael B Atkins, Mario Sznol, Margaret K Callahan, Suzanne L Topalian, Jeffrey A Sosman, Srividya Kotapati, Pratik K Thakkar, Corey Ritchings, Melanie Pe Benito, Sandra Re, Samira Soleymani, F Stephen Hodi","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) combination and NIVO monotherapy have demonstrated durable clinical benefit in patients with unresectable/metastatic melanoma. This analysis describes long-term overall survival (OS) with the combination or monotherapy pooled across all major company-sponsored trials, as well as clinical factors associated with survival, in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment-naïve unresectable/metastatic melanoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were pooled from six CheckMate studies in ICI treatment-naïve patients receiving NIVO + IPI (NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg or NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg) or NIVO monotherapy (3 mg/kg). OS was assessed for each treatment, as well as in select subgroups. Cox proportional multivariate analysis (MVA) and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed within treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up for OS was 45.0 months for patients treated with NIVO + IPI (n = 839) and 35.8 months for patients treated with NIVO (n = 536). OS was longer with NIVO + IPI versus NIVO monotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.91]), with 6-year OS rates of 52% versus 41%, respectively. Consistent benefit was observed in <i>BRAF</i>-mutant and <i>BRAF</i>-wild-type patients and those with normal and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Numerical difference in OS was also observed across PD-L1 expression levels, although more pronounced with no/low PD-L1 expression. Clinical factors associated with decreased survival in both the MVA and CART analyses were LDH > upper limit of normal with either treatment, age ≥65 years with NIVO + IPI, and the presence of liver metastases with NIVO monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large, pooled nonrandomized retrospective analysis, we observed that NIVO + IPI provides longer OS than NIVO in patients with ICI treatment-naïve advanced melanoma and identifies clinical factors that appear to be associated with survival for each treatment, which may assist with treatment decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2400400"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pooled Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Advanced Melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"Georgina V Long, James Larkin, Dirk Schadendorf, Jean-Jacques Grob, Christopher D Lao, Iván Márquez-Rodas, John Wagstaff, Céleste Lebbé, Jacopo Pigozzo, Caroline Robert, Paolo A Ascierto, Victoria Atkinson, Michael A Postow, Michael B Atkins, Mario Sznol, Margaret K Callahan, Suzanne L Topalian, Jeffrey A Sosman, Srividya Kotapati, Pratik K Thakkar, Corey Ritchings, Melanie Pe Benito, Sandra Re, Samira Soleymani, F Stephen Hodi\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO.24.00400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) combination and NIVO monotherapy have demonstrated durable clinical benefit in patients with unresectable/metastatic melanoma. This analysis describes long-term overall survival (OS) with the combination or monotherapy pooled across all major company-sponsored trials, as well as clinical factors associated with survival, in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment-naïve unresectable/metastatic melanoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were pooled from six CheckMate studies in ICI treatment-naïve patients receiving NIVO + IPI (NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg or NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg) or NIVO monotherapy (3 mg/kg). OS was assessed for each treatment, as well as in select subgroups. Cox proportional multivariate analysis (MVA) and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed within treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up for OS was 45.0 months for patients treated with NIVO + IPI (n = 839) and 35.8 months for patients treated with NIVO (n = 536). OS was longer with NIVO + IPI versus NIVO monotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.91]), with 6-year OS rates of 52% versus 41%, respectively. Consistent benefit was observed in <i>BRAF</i>-mutant and <i>BRAF</i>-wild-type patients and those with normal and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Numerical difference in OS was also observed across PD-L1 expression levels, although more pronounced with no/low PD-L1 expression. Clinical factors associated with decreased survival in both the MVA and CART analyses were LDH > upper limit of normal with either treatment, age ≥65 years with NIVO + IPI, and the presence of liver metastases with NIVO monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large, pooled nonrandomized retrospective analysis, we observed that NIVO + IPI provides longer OS than NIVO in patients with ICI treatment-naïve advanced melanoma and identifies clinical factors that appear to be associated with survival for each treatment, which may assist with treatment decision making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"JCO2400400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00400\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00400","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Nivolumab(NIVO)+ ipilimumab(IPI)联合疗法和NIVO单药疗法已在不可切除/转移性黑色素瘤患者中显示出持久的临床疗效。本分析报告介绍了在所有主要公司赞助的试验中,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗无效的不可切除/转移性黑色素瘤患者使用联合疗法或单一疗法的长期总生存率(OS),以及与生存率相关的临床因素:对接受NIVO + IPI(NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg或NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg)或NIVO单药治疗(3 mg/kg)的ICI治疗无效患者的六项CheckMate研究数据进行了汇总。对每种治疗方法以及特定亚组的 OS 进行了评估。在治疗组内进行了Cox比例多变量分析(MVA)和分类与回归树(CART)分析:结果:接受NIVO + IPI治疗的患者的OS中位随访时间为45.0个月(n = 839),接受NIVO治疗的患者的OS中位随访时间为35.8个月(n = 536)。NIVO+IPI与NIVO单药相比,OS更长(危险比为0.78 [95% CI,0.67至0.91]),6年OS率分别为52%和41%。在BRAF突变型和BRAF野生型患者以及乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)正常和升高的患者中观察到一致的获益。在不同PD-L1表达水平的患者中也观察到了OS的数值差异,但无PD-L1表达/低PD-L1表达的患者更为明显。在MVA和CART分析中,与生存率下降相关的临床因素有:两种疗法中的LDH均>正常值上限;NIVO+IPI疗法中的年龄≥65岁;NIVO单药疗法中的肝转移:在这项大型、汇总的非随机回顾性分析中,我们观察到,在ICI治疗无效的晚期黑色素瘤患者中,NIVO + IPI比NIVO提供更长的OS,并确定了似乎与每种疗法的生存期相关的临床因素,这可能有助于治疗决策的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pooled Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Advanced Melanoma.

Purpose: Nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) combination and NIVO monotherapy have demonstrated durable clinical benefit in patients with unresectable/metastatic melanoma. This analysis describes long-term overall survival (OS) with the combination or monotherapy pooled across all major company-sponsored trials, as well as clinical factors associated with survival, in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment-naïve unresectable/metastatic melanoma.

Methods: Data were pooled from six CheckMate studies in ICI treatment-naïve patients receiving NIVO + IPI (NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg or NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg) or NIVO monotherapy (3 mg/kg). OS was assessed for each treatment, as well as in select subgroups. Cox proportional multivariate analysis (MVA) and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed within treatment arms.

Results: Median follow-up for OS was 45.0 months for patients treated with NIVO + IPI (n = 839) and 35.8 months for patients treated with NIVO (n = 536). OS was longer with NIVO + IPI versus NIVO monotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.91]), with 6-year OS rates of 52% versus 41%, respectively. Consistent benefit was observed in BRAF-mutant and BRAF-wild-type patients and those with normal and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Numerical difference in OS was also observed across PD-L1 expression levels, although more pronounced with no/low PD-L1 expression. Clinical factors associated with decreased survival in both the MVA and CART analyses were LDH > upper limit of normal with either treatment, age ≥65 years with NIVO + IPI, and the presence of liver metastases with NIVO monotherapy.

Conclusion: In this large, pooled nonrandomized retrospective analysis, we observed that NIVO + IPI provides longer OS than NIVO in patients with ICI treatment-naïve advanced melanoma and identifies clinical factors that appear to be associated with survival for each treatment, which may assist with treatment decision making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
期刊最新文献
Intermittent or Continuous Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan for First-Line Treatment of RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The IMPROVE Trial. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Trial on Survival Evaluation (HORSE; MITO-18). Effectiveness of a Cardiovascular Health Electronic Health Record Application for Cancer Survivors in Community Oncology Practice: Results From WF-1804CD. US Food and Drug Administration's Directive to Deal With Delayed Confirmatory Trials: Lessons From Pralatrexate and Belinostat for T-Cell Lymphoma. Improving Access to Patient-Focused, Decentralized Clinical Trials Requires Streamlined Regulatory Requirements: An ASCO Research Statement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1