积极教学 积极教学技巧。

Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-31 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.21980/J8H94V
Alice Walz, Ian Kane
{"title":"积极教学 积极教学技巧。","authors":"Alice Walz, Ian Kane","doi":"10.21980/J8H94V","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Audience: </strong>The target audience for this small group workshop are interns and residents of any specialty.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>All residents are expected to become proficient teachers in a variety of settings as they progress in training, and many residency programs offer advanced training or credentialing in medical education.1,2 Recently, some emergency medicine programs have also begun to offer a formal medical education fellowship. Traditional resident education has been in the form of didactic lectures such as morning report, noon conference, and Grand Rounds as well as small group bedside teaching by attendings. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in many cases these learning structures have been reengineered into a hybrid or virtual model.3 This new educational paradigm has spurred the search for best practice teaching methods across a variety of situations. 4 Active teaching, characterized by audience engagement and self-directed learning, has been shown to promote deeper understanding and improved knowledge retention when compared to standard didactic teaching.5,6Educational curricula for residents now acknowledge the importance of audience participation, with more emphasis on the use of interactive teaching techniques. A review of residents-as-teachers curricula highlighted the importance of disseminating practical resources for how to effectively teach residents to be better educators.7 However, in the literature there are few examples of how to teach residents to implement these best practice interactive teaching methods. We designed a simple, interactive, and easily reproducible workshop for introducing the concepts of active teaching to residents that allows for active engagement with these techniques.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of this small group exercise, learners will be able to: 1) assess interactive teaching techniques that support learning in various environments; 2) incorporate active teaching techniques into a variety of real-world teaching scenarios; 3) implement selected techniques to enrich one's own teaching practice.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>Our workshop was designed to include elements of gamification, which facilitates teamwork and competition and can be used to engage learners in higher levels of learning.8 We began by performing a literature search for descriptions of active teaching techniques that had been used in the medical setting.9-14 We developed a list of 15 popular active teaching strategies and created a one-page menu which briefly described each strategy. Utilizing the flipped classroom model, we identified three articles (references 10, 11, and 14) which reviewed active teaching techniques and sent these articles to our participants via email one week before our session with instructions to read the articles and come prepared to discuss them at our session. We created two sets of playing cards for our activity. The first set of playing cards was titled \"teaching setting\" and included common venues for teaching in clinical medicine: morning report, grand rounds warm-up (which at our institution consists of a 15-minute lecture given to a large audience in a formal setting), small group, bedside teaching, journal club, and an online/virtual lecture. The second set of playing cards included simulated audiences that could be present at a teaching session: peers (residents), medical students, attendings, or mixed audience. To account for larger groups of residents, we made multiple copies of each card within the respective card set.At the beginning of the workshop, the learning objectives were discussed and the menu with the 15 active teaching techniques was reviewed along with the assigned pre-reading articles. Residents were asked to name different active teaching techniques and give examples they experienced during their residency or medical school education. Participants (pediatric and medicine-pediatric residents) were then placed in groups of three or four, and each group drew one teaching setting card and one audience card. All groups were given the same general topic (diabetic ketoacidosis) and each group was challenged to design a short teaching activity relevant to the topic that incorporated active teaching techniques appropriate for their setting and audience. After a short period of planning, each group reported how they would teach the topic and which active teaching strategies they would use. After each group described their approach, they received peer feedback from the other groups' participants. Key aspects of the proposed active teaching techniques and any barriers to implementation were discussed. The cards were then reshuffled for each group, and the exercise was repeated with a different general topic (in our session, we chose developmental milestones).</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>Participants provided anonymous feedback in the form of surveys which assessed the efficacy of the workshop. Participants were also asked to commit to three active teaching techniques they would incorporate into teaching sessions within the next six months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our workshop was presented for two sequential years: 2022 and 2023. Our workshop was attended by 32 residents in year one and 36 residents in year two. All participants filled out the anonymous evaluation survey at the conclusion of the exercise. Eighty-five percent of respondents rated the session as \"highly organized,\" and a majority strongly agreed that the workshop was effective for learning active teaching techniques (78%) and taught them concrete techniques that they could incorporate into their future teaching (88%). Participants reported that they were most likely to utilize Jigsaw (31 respondents), Polling/audience response (29 respondents), case-based learning (25 respondents), role play (24 respondents) and small group activities (20 respondents) into their next teaching session. In our second workshop, there were 19 participants who had also attended the first workshop. All 19 of these residents reported using at least one active teaching technique during the previous year, and over half reported using at least three of the techniques.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the organization and efficacy of this workshop. The strategies of using sets of cards to randomize the process, adding time constraints, and having each group report their teaching plans increased overall participant interest and excitement in the workshop. Having all groups design teaching sessions using the same general topic was chosen intentionally to promote friendly competition and to allow for discussion among the groups about similarities and differences in the application of their chosen active teaching techniques. To apply our activity to other specialties, we recommend choosing general topics that are commonly encountered in that specialty; for example, the topic of \"myocardial infarction\" or \"pediatric toxidromes\" could be used for emergency medicine residents.</p><p><strong>Topics: </strong>Active teaching, pediatrics, adult learning theory, graduate medical education, undergraduate medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Actively Teaching Active Teaching Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Walz, Ian Kane\",\"doi\":\"10.21980/J8H94V\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Audience: </strong>The target audience for this small group workshop are interns and residents of any specialty.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>All residents are expected to become proficient teachers in a variety of settings as they progress in training, and many residency programs offer advanced training or credentialing in medical education.1,2 Recently, some emergency medicine programs have also begun to offer a formal medical education fellowship. Traditional resident education has been in the form of didactic lectures such as morning report, noon conference, and Grand Rounds as well as small group bedside teaching by attendings. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in many cases these learning structures have been reengineered into a hybrid or virtual model.3 This new educational paradigm has spurred the search for best practice teaching methods across a variety of situations. 4 Active teaching, characterized by audience engagement and self-directed learning, has been shown to promote deeper understanding and improved knowledge retention when compared to standard didactic teaching.5,6Educational curricula for residents now acknowledge the importance of audience participation, with more emphasis on the use of interactive teaching techniques. A review of residents-as-teachers curricula highlighted the importance of disseminating practical resources for how to effectively teach residents to be better educators.7 However, in the literature there are few examples of how to teach residents to implement these best practice interactive teaching methods. We designed a simple, interactive, and easily reproducible workshop for introducing the concepts of active teaching to residents that allows for active engagement with these techniques.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of this small group exercise, learners will be able to: 1) assess interactive teaching techniques that support learning in various environments; 2) incorporate active teaching techniques into a variety of real-world teaching scenarios; 3) implement selected techniques to enrich one's own teaching practice.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>Our workshop was designed to include elements of gamification, which facilitates teamwork and competition and can be used to engage learners in higher levels of learning.8 We began by performing a literature search for descriptions of active teaching techniques that had been used in the medical setting.9-14 We developed a list of 15 popular active teaching strategies and created a one-page menu which briefly described each strategy. Utilizing the flipped classroom model, we identified three articles (references 10, 11, and 14) which reviewed active teaching techniques and sent these articles to our participants via email one week before our session with instructions to read the articles and come prepared to discuss them at our session. We created two sets of playing cards for our activity. The first set of playing cards was titled \\\"teaching setting\\\" and included common venues for teaching in clinical medicine: morning report, grand rounds warm-up (which at our institution consists of a 15-minute lecture given to a large audience in a formal setting), small group, bedside teaching, journal club, and an online/virtual lecture. The second set of playing cards included simulated audiences that could be present at a teaching session: peers (residents), medical students, attendings, or mixed audience. To account for larger groups of residents, we made multiple copies of each card within the respective card set.At the beginning of the workshop, the learning objectives were discussed and the menu with the 15 active teaching techniques was reviewed along with the assigned pre-reading articles. Residents were asked to name different active teaching techniques and give examples they experienced during their residency or medical school education. Participants (pediatric and medicine-pediatric residents) were then placed in groups of three or four, and each group drew one teaching setting card and one audience card. All groups were given the same general topic (diabetic ketoacidosis) and each group was challenged to design a short teaching activity relevant to the topic that incorporated active teaching techniques appropriate for their setting and audience. After a short period of planning, each group reported how they would teach the topic and which active teaching strategies they would use. After each group described their approach, they received peer feedback from the other groups' participants. Key aspects of the proposed active teaching techniques and any barriers to implementation were discussed. The cards were then reshuffled for each group, and the exercise was repeated with a different general topic (in our session, we chose developmental milestones).</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>Participants provided anonymous feedback in the form of surveys which assessed the efficacy of the workshop. Participants were also asked to commit to three active teaching techniques they would incorporate into teaching sessions within the next six months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our workshop was presented for two sequential years: 2022 and 2023. Our workshop was attended by 32 residents in year one and 36 residents in year two. All participants filled out the anonymous evaluation survey at the conclusion of the exercise. Eighty-five percent of respondents rated the session as \\\"highly organized,\\\" and a majority strongly agreed that the workshop was effective for learning active teaching techniques (78%) and taught them concrete techniques that they could incorporate into their future teaching (88%). Participants reported that they were most likely to utilize Jigsaw (31 respondents), Polling/audience response (29 respondents), case-based learning (25 respondents), role play (24 respondents) and small group activities (20 respondents) into their next teaching session. In our second workshop, there were 19 participants who had also attended the first workshop. All 19 of these residents reported using at least one active teaching technique during the previous year, and over half reported using at least three of the techniques.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the organization and efficacy of this workshop. The strategies of using sets of cards to randomize the process, adding time constraints, and having each group report their teaching plans increased overall participant interest and excitement in the workshop. Having all groups design teaching sessions using the same general topic was chosen intentionally to promote friendly competition and to allow for discussion among the groups about similarities and differences in the application of their chosen active teaching techniques. To apply our activity to other specialties, we recommend choosing general topics that are commonly encountered in that specialty; for example, the topic of \\\"myocardial infarction\\\" or \\\"pediatric toxidromes\\\" could be used for emergency medicine residents.</p><p><strong>Topics: </strong>Active teaching, pediatrics, adult learning theory, graduate medical education, undergraduate medical education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21980/J8H94V\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21980/J8H94V","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

此外,还要求参与者承诺在未来六个月内将三种积极的教学技巧纳入教学课程:我们的研讨会连续举办了两年:2022 年和 2023 年。第一年有 32 名住院医师参加,第二年有 36 名住院医师参加。活动结束后,所有参与者都填写了匿名评估调查表。85%的受访者将此次培训评为 "组织得很好",大多数受访者强烈认为,此次培训对学习主动教学技巧很有效(78%),并教会了他们一些具体技巧,他们可以将这些技巧运用到今后的教学中(88%)。参加者表示,他们最有可能在下一次教学中使用拼图(31 人回答)、投票/观众反应(29 人回答)、案例式学习(25 人回答)、角色扮演(24 人回答)和小组活动(20 人回答)。在第二次研讨会上,有 19 名与会者也参加了第一次研讨会。所有这 19 位学员都表示在过去一年中至少使用过一种主动教学技巧,超过半数的学员表示至少使用过三种技巧:讨论:学员们对此次培训班的组织和效果表示非常满意。使用成套的卡片随机安排教学过程、增加时间限制以及让每个小组报告他们的教学计划等策略,提高了学员对工作坊的整体兴趣和兴奋度。让所有小组使用相同的一般主题设计教学环节,是有意为之,目的是促进友好竞争,并让各小组讨论在应用所选主动教学技巧方面的异同。要将我们的活动应用到其他专业,我们建议选择该专业常见的一般主题;例如,"心肌梗死 "或 "儿科毒血症 "的主题可用于急诊科住院医师:主动教学、儿科、成人学习理论、医学研究生教育、医学本科生教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Actively Teaching Active Teaching Techniques.

Audience: The target audience for this small group workshop are interns and residents of any specialty.

Introduction: All residents are expected to become proficient teachers in a variety of settings as they progress in training, and many residency programs offer advanced training or credentialing in medical education.1,2 Recently, some emergency medicine programs have also begun to offer a formal medical education fellowship. Traditional resident education has been in the form of didactic lectures such as morning report, noon conference, and Grand Rounds as well as small group bedside teaching by attendings. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in many cases these learning structures have been reengineered into a hybrid or virtual model.3 This new educational paradigm has spurred the search for best practice teaching methods across a variety of situations. 4 Active teaching, characterized by audience engagement and self-directed learning, has been shown to promote deeper understanding and improved knowledge retention when compared to standard didactic teaching.5,6Educational curricula for residents now acknowledge the importance of audience participation, with more emphasis on the use of interactive teaching techniques. A review of residents-as-teachers curricula highlighted the importance of disseminating practical resources for how to effectively teach residents to be better educators.7 However, in the literature there are few examples of how to teach residents to implement these best practice interactive teaching methods. We designed a simple, interactive, and easily reproducible workshop for introducing the concepts of active teaching to residents that allows for active engagement with these techniques.

Educational objectives: By the end of this small group exercise, learners will be able to: 1) assess interactive teaching techniques that support learning in various environments; 2) incorporate active teaching techniques into a variety of real-world teaching scenarios; 3) implement selected techniques to enrich one's own teaching practice.

Educational methods: Our workshop was designed to include elements of gamification, which facilitates teamwork and competition and can be used to engage learners in higher levels of learning.8 We began by performing a literature search for descriptions of active teaching techniques that had been used in the medical setting.9-14 We developed a list of 15 popular active teaching strategies and created a one-page menu which briefly described each strategy. Utilizing the flipped classroom model, we identified three articles (references 10, 11, and 14) which reviewed active teaching techniques and sent these articles to our participants via email one week before our session with instructions to read the articles and come prepared to discuss them at our session. We created two sets of playing cards for our activity. The first set of playing cards was titled "teaching setting" and included common venues for teaching in clinical medicine: morning report, grand rounds warm-up (which at our institution consists of a 15-minute lecture given to a large audience in a formal setting), small group, bedside teaching, journal club, and an online/virtual lecture. The second set of playing cards included simulated audiences that could be present at a teaching session: peers (residents), medical students, attendings, or mixed audience. To account for larger groups of residents, we made multiple copies of each card within the respective card set.At the beginning of the workshop, the learning objectives were discussed and the menu with the 15 active teaching techniques was reviewed along with the assigned pre-reading articles. Residents were asked to name different active teaching techniques and give examples they experienced during their residency or medical school education. Participants (pediatric and medicine-pediatric residents) were then placed in groups of three or four, and each group drew one teaching setting card and one audience card. All groups were given the same general topic (diabetic ketoacidosis) and each group was challenged to design a short teaching activity relevant to the topic that incorporated active teaching techniques appropriate for their setting and audience. After a short period of planning, each group reported how they would teach the topic and which active teaching strategies they would use. After each group described their approach, they received peer feedback from the other groups' participants. Key aspects of the proposed active teaching techniques and any barriers to implementation were discussed. The cards were then reshuffled for each group, and the exercise was repeated with a different general topic (in our session, we chose developmental milestones).

Research methods: Participants provided anonymous feedback in the form of surveys which assessed the efficacy of the workshop. Participants were also asked to commit to three active teaching techniques they would incorporate into teaching sessions within the next six months.

Results: Our workshop was presented for two sequential years: 2022 and 2023. Our workshop was attended by 32 residents in year one and 36 residents in year two. All participants filled out the anonymous evaluation survey at the conclusion of the exercise. Eighty-five percent of respondents rated the session as "highly organized," and a majority strongly agreed that the workshop was effective for learning active teaching techniques (78%) and taught them concrete techniques that they could incorporate into their future teaching (88%). Participants reported that they were most likely to utilize Jigsaw (31 respondents), Polling/audience response (29 respondents), case-based learning (25 respondents), role play (24 respondents) and small group activities (20 respondents) into their next teaching session. In our second workshop, there were 19 participants who had also attended the first workshop. All 19 of these residents reported using at least one active teaching technique during the previous year, and over half reported using at least three of the techniques.

Discussion: Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the organization and efficacy of this workshop. The strategies of using sets of cards to randomize the process, adding time constraints, and having each group report their teaching plans increased overall participant interest and excitement in the workshop. Having all groups design teaching sessions using the same general topic was chosen intentionally to promote friendly competition and to allow for discussion among the groups about similarities and differences in the application of their chosen active teaching techniques. To apply our activity to other specialties, we recommend choosing general topics that are commonly encountered in that specialty; for example, the topic of "myocardial infarction" or "pediatric toxidromes" could be used for emergency medicine residents.

Topics: Active teaching, pediatrics, adult learning theory, graduate medical education, undergraduate medical education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Case of Painful Visual Loss - Managing Orbital Compartment Syndrome in the Emergency Department. A Case Report on Dermatomyositis in a Female Patient with Facial Rash and Swelling. A Simulation and Small-Group Pediatric Emergency Medicine Course for Generalist Healthcare Providers: Gastrointestinal and Nutrition Emergencies. A Whodunit Gamified Flipped Classroom For High Yield Bite Injuries And Envenomation. Actively Teaching Active Teaching Techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1