运动干预与儿童和青少年的智力:一项 Meta 分析。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1542/peds.2023-064771
Javier S Morales, Pedro L Valenzuela, Óscar Martínez-de-Quel, Juan Luis Sánchez-Sánchez, Adrià Muntaner-Mas, Kirk I Erickson, Ana Carbonell-Baeza, Francisco B Ortega, David Jiménez-Pavón
{"title":"运动干预与儿童和青少年的智力:一项 Meta 分析。","authors":"Javier S Morales, Pedro L Valenzuela, Óscar Martínez-de-Quel, Juan Luis Sánchez-Sánchez, Adrià Muntaner-Mas, Kirk I Erickson, Ana Carbonell-Baeza, Francisco B Ortega, David Jiménez-Pavón","doi":"10.1542/peds.2023-064771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Context: </strong>Mixed evidence exists on whether physical exercise interventions influence intelligence measures in children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effect of exercise interventions on intelligence in children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Relevant articles were identified in PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus (until February 22, 2024).</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of exercise interventions on intelligence in youth (≤19 years).</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for intelligence measures reported in ≥3 studies. Subanalyses examined the moderating effect of variables such as participants' intelligence quotient (IQ), age, or intervention duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen randomized controlled trials (n = 3203 participants; age range = 5-14 years) were included. Exercise interventions significantly improved general intelligence compared with control groups (standardized mean difference = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11-0.97, P = .01), which corresponded to a mean improvement in the IQ score of 4.0 points (95% CI = 1.44-6.64, P = .01). Significant benefits of exercise interventions were also observed for fluid intelligence (standard mean difference = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.06-0.34, P = .006). Crystallized intelligence could not be meta-analyzed because of a lack of studies. Subanalyses revealed similar benefits in participants with low/borderline versus normal IQ, children versus adolescents, and interventions with different durations.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The heterogeneity observed in the characteristics of the exercise interventions and the populations included can be a potential confounding factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exercise interventions are associated with improvements in intelligence (including both general and fluid intelligence) in youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exercise Interventions and Intelligence in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Javier S Morales, Pedro L Valenzuela, Óscar Martínez-de-Quel, Juan Luis Sánchez-Sánchez, Adrià Muntaner-Mas, Kirk I Erickson, Ana Carbonell-Baeza, Francisco B Ortega, David Jiménez-Pavón\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/peds.2023-064771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p></p><p><strong>Context: </strong>Mixed evidence exists on whether physical exercise interventions influence intelligence measures in children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effect of exercise interventions on intelligence in children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Relevant articles were identified in PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus (until February 22, 2024).</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of exercise interventions on intelligence in youth (≤19 years).</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for intelligence measures reported in ≥3 studies. Subanalyses examined the moderating effect of variables such as participants' intelligence quotient (IQ), age, or intervention duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen randomized controlled trials (n = 3203 participants; age range = 5-14 years) were included. Exercise interventions significantly improved general intelligence compared with control groups (standardized mean difference = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11-0.97, P = .01), which corresponded to a mean improvement in the IQ score of 4.0 points (95% CI = 1.44-6.64, P = .01). Significant benefits of exercise interventions were also observed for fluid intelligence (standard mean difference = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.06-0.34, P = .006). Crystallized intelligence could not be meta-analyzed because of a lack of studies. Subanalyses revealed similar benefits in participants with low/borderline versus normal IQ, children versus adolescents, and interventions with different durations.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The heterogeneity observed in the characteristics of the exercise interventions and the populations included can be a potential confounding factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exercise interventions are associated with improvements in intelligence (including both general and fluid intelligence) in youth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2023-064771\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2023-064771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景关于体育锻炼干预是否会影响儿童和青少年的智力测验结果,目前证据不一:确定运动干预对儿童和青少年智力的影响:在PubMed、Web of Science、PsycINFO和Scopus(截至2024年2月22日)上查找相关文章:研究选择:评估运动干预对青少年(19 岁以下)智力影响的随机对照试验:对≥3项研究中报告的智力测量结果进行随机效应荟萃分析。子分析研究了参与者的智商(IQ)、年龄或干预持续时间等变量的调节作用:结果:共纳入 14 项随机对照试验(n = 3203 名参与者;年龄范围 = 5-14 岁)。与对照组相比,运动干预明显改善了一般智力(标准化平均差异=0.54,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.11-0.97,P = .01),相当于智商平均提高了4.0分(95% CI = 1.44-6.64,P = .01)。运动干预对流体智力也有显著的益处(标准平均差 = 0.20,95% CI = 0.06-0.34,P = .006)。由于缺乏研究,无法对结晶智能进行元分析。子分析表明,低智商/边缘智商与正常智商、儿童与青少年以及不同持续时间的干预对参与者的益处相似:局限性:在运动干预的特点和纳入人群方面观察到的异质性可能是一个潜在的干扰因素:运动干预与青少年智力(包括一般智力和流体智力)的提高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exercise Interventions and Intelligence in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis.

Context: Mixed evidence exists on whether physical exercise interventions influence intelligence measures in children and adolescents.

Objective: To determine the effect of exercise interventions on intelligence in children and adolescents.

Data sources: Relevant articles were identified in PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus (until February 22, 2024).

Study selection: Randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of exercise interventions on intelligence in youth (≤19 years).

Data extraction: A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for intelligence measures reported in ≥3 studies. Subanalyses examined the moderating effect of variables such as participants' intelligence quotient (IQ), age, or intervention duration.

Results: Fourteen randomized controlled trials (n = 3203 participants; age range = 5-14 years) were included. Exercise interventions significantly improved general intelligence compared with control groups (standardized mean difference = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11-0.97, P = .01), which corresponded to a mean improvement in the IQ score of 4.0 points (95% CI = 1.44-6.64, P = .01). Significant benefits of exercise interventions were also observed for fluid intelligence (standard mean difference = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.06-0.34, P = .006). Crystallized intelligence could not be meta-analyzed because of a lack of studies. Subanalyses revealed similar benefits in participants with low/borderline versus normal IQ, children versus adolescents, and interventions with different durations.

Limitations: The heterogeneity observed in the characteristics of the exercise interventions and the populations included can be a potential confounding factor.

Conclusions: Exercise interventions are associated with improvements in intelligence (including both general and fluid intelligence) in youth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
期刊最新文献
Autism, Electrical Status Epilepticus in Sleep, and a Likely Pathogenic SEMA6B Variant. Children's Understanding of Commonly Used Medical Terminology. A Missing Step in Supporting the Well-Being of CYSHCN and Families. Supporting the Well-Being of Children and Youth With Special Health Care Needs: NASEM Proceedings. Parent Perspectives on Nirsevimab for Their Newborn.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1