{"title":"评估电刺激臀大肌收缩对仰卧位床面间压力的影响","authors":"Yoshiyuki Yoshikawa, Mizuki Shimooka, Momoyo Yoshikawa, Noriaki Maeshige, Mikiko Uemura, Atomu Yamaguchi, Xiaoqi Ma, Hiroto Terashi","doi":"10.2490/prm.20240035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated the impact of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to the gluteus maximus in the bed flat position (F position) and 30-degree head elevation position (30 HE position) on sacral pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty volunteers consented to participate in this study. Sacral pressure was measured in the F position and at the 30 HE position with and without NMES in the supine positions. NMES was applied to the gluteus maximus (frequency, 50 Hz; pulse width, 300 μs) with sufficient stimulus intensity to induce muscle contraction. Sacral maximum pressure was determined as peak pressure index (PPI) by averaging the values from the central nine sensors of the maximum pressure zone. The effect of NMES on pressure gradient and the influence of sex difference were also explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sacral PPI was significantly lower after NMES implementation in both the F position and the 30 HE position when compared with conditions without NMES (P <0.001). The pressure gradient was also significantly decreased with NMES (P <0.001). Analysis of sex difference in subjects treated with NMES revealed a significantly greater effect on maximum sacral pressure in males than in females.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Application of NMES to the gluteus maximus helps to disperse sacral pressure in supine positions. NMES on the gluteus maximus can be a clinical means to manage interfacial pressure in supine positions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"9 ","pages":"20240035"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Effect of Gluteus Maximus Contraction by Electrical Stimulation on Interfacial Pressure in Supine Bed Positions.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshiyuki Yoshikawa, Mizuki Shimooka, Momoyo Yoshikawa, Noriaki Maeshige, Mikiko Uemura, Atomu Yamaguchi, Xiaoqi Ma, Hiroto Terashi\",\"doi\":\"10.2490/prm.20240035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated the impact of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to the gluteus maximus in the bed flat position (F position) and 30-degree head elevation position (30 HE position) on sacral pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty volunteers consented to participate in this study. Sacral pressure was measured in the F position and at the 30 HE position with and without NMES in the supine positions. NMES was applied to the gluteus maximus (frequency, 50 Hz; pulse width, 300 μs) with sufficient stimulus intensity to induce muscle contraction. Sacral maximum pressure was determined as peak pressure index (PPI) by averaging the values from the central nine sensors of the maximum pressure zone. The effect of NMES on pressure gradient and the influence of sex difference were also explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sacral PPI was significantly lower after NMES implementation in both the F position and the 30 HE position when compared with conditions without NMES (P <0.001). The pressure gradient was also significantly decreased with NMES (P <0.001). Analysis of sex difference in subjects treated with NMES revealed a significantly greater effect on maximum sacral pressure in males than in females.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Application of NMES to the gluteus maximus helps to disperse sacral pressure in supine positions. NMES on the gluteus maximus can be a clinical means to manage interfacial pressure in supine positions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in rehabilitation medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"20240035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534443/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in rehabilitation medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20240035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20240035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究调查了在平卧位(F 位)和头部抬高 30 度位(30 HE 位)时对臀大肌进行神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)对骶压的影响:方法:20 名志愿者同意参加本研究。方法:20 名志愿者同意参加这项研究。在仰卧位时,分别在 F 位和 30 HE 位测量了有无 NMES 的骶压。对臀大肌施加 NMES(频率 50 Hz;脉宽 300 μs),刺激强度足以引起肌肉收缩。通过对最大压力区中央九个传感器的数值取平均值,确定骶骨最大压力为峰值压力指数(PPI)。此外,还探讨了 NMES 对压力梯度的影响以及性别差异的影响:结果:与未使用 NMES 的情况相比,在 F 位和 30 HE 位使用 NMES 后,骶骨 PPI 均明显降低(P 结论:NMES 对压力梯度的影响和性别差异的影响均有显著影响:对臀大肌施加 NMES 有助于分散仰卧位时的骶压。臀大肌上的 NMES 可作为一种临床手段,用于管理仰卧位时的骶骨间压力。
Evaluation of the Effect of Gluteus Maximus Contraction by Electrical Stimulation on Interfacial Pressure in Supine Bed Positions.
Objectives: This study investigated the impact of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to the gluteus maximus in the bed flat position (F position) and 30-degree head elevation position (30 HE position) on sacral pressure.
Methods: Twenty volunteers consented to participate in this study. Sacral pressure was measured in the F position and at the 30 HE position with and without NMES in the supine positions. NMES was applied to the gluteus maximus (frequency, 50 Hz; pulse width, 300 μs) with sufficient stimulus intensity to induce muscle contraction. Sacral maximum pressure was determined as peak pressure index (PPI) by averaging the values from the central nine sensors of the maximum pressure zone. The effect of NMES on pressure gradient and the influence of sex difference were also explored.
Results: Sacral PPI was significantly lower after NMES implementation in both the F position and the 30 HE position when compared with conditions without NMES (P <0.001). The pressure gradient was also significantly decreased with NMES (P <0.001). Analysis of sex difference in subjects treated with NMES revealed a significantly greater effect on maximum sacral pressure in males than in females.
Conclusions: Application of NMES to the gluteus maximus helps to disperse sacral pressure in supine positions. NMES on the gluteus maximus can be a clinical means to manage interfacial pressure in supine positions.