COVID-19 期间心理保健从业人员的抑郁、焦虑和应对机制。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY South African Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-10-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2307
Yolandi Stals, Edwin du Plessis, Paul J Pretorius, Mariette Nel, Alexander Boateng
{"title":"COVID-19 期间心理保健从业人员的抑郁、焦虑和应对机制。","authors":"Yolandi Stals, Edwin du Plessis, Paul J Pretorius, Mariette Nel, Alexander Boateng","doi":"10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed the psychological functioning of mental healthcare practitioners under severe strain. Coping methods may affect mental health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study examined the relationship between depression, anxiety, stress, and coping styles utilised by mental healthcare practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three private and one public mental healthcare facility in Bloemfontein, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Respondents completed the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (Brief-COPE) inventories. An ordinal regression model was used to assess the relationship between coping styles, anxiety and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 212 practitioners were included in the analysis. According to DASS-21 measures, approximately 41% and 28% of respondents had moderate to severe depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively, with the highest prevalence among younger female respondents and nurses. The association between stress severity, anxiety and depression was significant. Avoidant coping methods and two approach coping strategies (planning and acceptance) were associated with depression and anxiety. Anxiety was linked to an increased likelihood of transitioning to higher avoidant categories, while participants with depression were less likely to move to higher avoidant or approach categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mental healthcare practitioners, especially nurses, experienced significant COVID-19-related psychological distress during the pandemic. Avoidant coping mechanisms may increase the risk of poor mental health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study added data on the mental health effects of COVID-19 on mental healthcare practitioners, as well as psychological methods used to cope during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":51156,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"30 ","pages":"2307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depression, anxiety and coping mechanisms among mental healthcare practitioners during COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Yolandi Stals, Edwin du Plessis, Paul J Pretorius, Mariette Nel, Alexander Boateng\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed the psychological functioning of mental healthcare practitioners under severe strain. Coping methods may affect mental health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study examined the relationship between depression, anxiety, stress, and coping styles utilised by mental healthcare practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three private and one public mental healthcare facility in Bloemfontein, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Respondents completed the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (Brief-COPE) inventories. An ordinal regression model was used to assess the relationship between coping styles, anxiety and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 212 practitioners were included in the analysis. According to DASS-21 measures, approximately 41% and 28% of respondents had moderate to severe depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively, with the highest prevalence among younger female respondents and nurses. The association between stress severity, anxiety and depression was significant. Avoidant coping methods and two approach coping strategies (planning and acceptance) were associated with depression and anxiety. Anxiety was linked to an increased likelihood of transitioning to higher avoidant categories, while participants with depression were less likely to move to higher avoidant or approach categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mental healthcare practitioners, especially nurses, experienced significant COVID-19-related psychological distress during the pandemic. Avoidant coping mechanisms may increase the risk of poor mental health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study added data on the mental health effects of COVID-19 on mental healthcare practitioners, as well as psychological methods used to cope during the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"2307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538319/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2307\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2307","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行给心理保健从业人员的心理功能带来了巨大压力。目的:本研究探讨了 COVID-19 大流行期间心理保健从业人员的抑郁、焦虑、压力和应对方式之间的关系:研究地点:南非布隆方丹市的三家私立和一家公立精神医疗机构:受访者填写了抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21)和简明问题应对取向(Brief-COPE)问卷。研究采用了一个顺序回归模型来评估应对方式、焦虑和抑郁之间的关系:共有 212 名从业人员参与了分析。根据 DASS-21 测量,分别约有 41% 和 28% 的受访者有中度至重度抑郁症状和焦虑症状,其中年轻女性受访者和护士的患病率最高。压力严重程度、焦虑和抑郁之间存在显著关联。回避型应对方法和两种接近型应对策略(计划和接受)与抑郁和焦虑有关。焦虑与转入较高回避类别的可能性增加有关,而患有抑郁症的参与者转入较高回避或接近类别的可能性较小:结论:心理保健从业人员,尤其是护士,在大流行期间经历了与 COVID-19 相关的严重心理困扰。回避型应对机制可能会增加不良心理健康后果的风险:本研究增加了 COVID-19 对精神卫生保健从业人员心理健康影响的数据,以及在大流行期间使用的心理应对方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Depression, anxiety and coping mechanisms among mental healthcare practitioners during COVID-19.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed the psychological functioning of mental healthcare practitioners under severe strain. Coping methods may affect mental health outcomes.

Aim: The study examined the relationship between depression, anxiety, stress, and coping styles utilised by mental healthcare practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Setting: Three private and one public mental healthcare facility in Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Methods: Respondents completed the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (Brief-COPE) inventories. An ordinal regression model was used to assess the relationship between coping styles, anxiety and depression.

Results: A total of 212 practitioners were included in the analysis. According to DASS-21 measures, approximately 41% and 28% of respondents had moderate to severe depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively, with the highest prevalence among younger female respondents and nurses. The association between stress severity, anxiety and depression was significant. Avoidant coping methods and two approach coping strategies (planning and acceptance) were associated with depression and anxiety. Anxiety was linked to an increased likelihood of transitioning to higher avoidant categories, while participants with depression were less likely to move to higher avoidant or approach categories.

Conclusion: Mental healthcare practitioners, especially nurses, experienced significant COVID-19-related psychological distress during the pandemic. Avoidant coping mechanisms may increase the risk of poor mental health outcomes.

Contribution: This study added data on the mental health effects of COVID-19 on mental healthcare practitioners, as well as psychological methods used to cope during the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is the leading psychiatric journal of Africa. It provides open-access scholarly reading for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists and all with an interest in mental health. It carries empirical and conceptual research articles, reviews, editorials, and scientific letters related to psychiatry. It publishes work from various places in the world, and makes special provision for the interests of Africa. It seeks to serve its readership and researchers with the most topical content in psychiatry for clinical practice and academic pursuits, including work in the subspecialty areas of psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
The lifeworld of families of mental health care users in rural South Africa: A phenomenological study. Knowledge and attitudes towards electroconvulsive therapy in an academic psychiatric department. Teaching transference focused psychotherapy to South African mental health practitioners. Safety and effectiveness of methylphenidate ER multi-unit pellet system in ADHD patients: An open label study. An in depth review of body shaming phenomenon among adolescent: Trigger factors, psychological impact and prevention efforts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1