部级咨询委员会和 3 年的 COVID-19 专业知识--卫生部的信息共享模式是否已为大流行病做好准备?

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Samj South African Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i8.1943
M Richter, Y Nokhepheyi
{"title":"部级咨询委员会和 3 年的 COVID-19 专业知识--卫生部的信息共享模式是否已为大流行病做好准备?","authors":"M Richter, Y Nokhepheyi","doi":"10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i8.1943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective pandemic decision-making depends on scientific expert evidence, transparency about public health policy decision-making, its rationales and the evidence on which it is based. The South African government laudably committed its COVID-19 response to be guided by science and evidence. Yet, the expert advice that it received was not always readily made available to the public. This submission analyses the time elapsed between the submission of COVID-19 Ministerial Advisory Committees memoranda to the Minister of Health, and the Department of Health's subsequent publication of these for the period August 2020 - January 2024. It also summarises the outcomes of the Health Justice Initiative's access to information legal action against the department on expert advice and government decision-making during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":49576,"journal":{"name":"Samj South African Medical Journal","volume":"114 8","pages":"e1943"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ministerial Advisory Committees and 3 years of COVID-19 expertise - is the Department of Health's model for information-sharing pandemic-ready?\",\"authors\":\"M Richter, Y Nokhepheyi\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i8.1943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Effective pandemic decision-making depends on scientific expert evidence, transparency about public health policy decision-making, its rationales and the evidence on which it is based. The South African government laudably committed its COVID-19 response to be guided by science and evidence. Yet, the expert advice that it received was not always readily made available to the public. This submission analyses the time elapsed between the submission of COVID-19 Ministerial Advisory Committees memoranda to the Minister of Health, and the Department of Health's subsequent publication of these for the period August 2020 - January 2024. It also summarises the outcomes of the Health Justice Initiative's access to information legal action against the department on expert advice and government decision-making during the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Samj South African Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"114 8\",\"pages\":\"e1943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Samj South African Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i8.1943\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Samj South African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i8.1943","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的大流行病决策取决于科学的专家证据、公共卫生政策决策的透明度、其理由和所依据的证据。南非政府承诺其 COVID-19 应对措施以科学和证据为指导,这是值得称赞的。然而,政府收到的专家建议并不总是能随时向公众公布。本报告分析了从向卫生部长提交 COVID-19 部长级咨询委员会备忘录到卫生部随后公布 2020 年 8 月至 2024 年 1 月期间这些备忘录之间的时间间隔。报告还总结了 "健康正义行动"(Health Justice Initiative)就大流行病期间的专家建议和政府决策对卫生部提起的信息公开法律诉讼的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Ministerial Advisory Committees and 3 years of COVID-19 expertise - is the Department of Health's model for information-sharing pandemic-ready?

Effective pandemic decision-making depends on scientific expert evidence, transparency about public health policy decision-making, its rationales and the evidence on which it is based. The South African government laudably committed its COVID-19 response to be guided by science and evidence. Yet, the expert advice that it received was not always readily made available to the public. This submission analyses the time elapsed between the submission of COVID-19 Ministerial Advisory Committees memoranda to the Minister of Health, and the Department of Health's subsequent publication of these for the period August 2020 - January 2024. It also summarises the outcomes of the Health Justice Initiative's access to information legal action against the department on expert advice and government decision-making during the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Samj South African Medical Journal
Samj South African Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
175
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The SAMJ is a monthly peer reviewed, internationally indexed, general medical journal. It carries The SAMJ is a monthly, peer-reviewed, internationally indexed, general medical journal publishing leading research impacting clinical care in Africa. The Journal is not limited to articles that have ‘general medical content’, but is intending to capture the spectrum of medical and health sciences, grouped by relevance to the country’s burden of disease. This will include research in the social sciences and economics that is relevant to the medical issues around our burden of disease The journal carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other medical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries, general correspondence, and classified advertisements (refer to the section policies for further information).
期刊最新文献
Analysis of emergency centre recidivism for interpersonal violence in a district-level hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. Case report: First reported case of spondylodiscitis caused by Gemella morbillorum in South Africa. Case report: First reported case of spondylodiscitis caused by Gemella morbillorum in South Africa. Climate change, extreme heat and heat waves. Comparison of ultraviolet C light and isopropyl alcohol for the disinfection of cellular phones in a paediatric intensive care unit setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1