澳大利亚医护人员对乳腺筛查中人工智能的看法:混合方法调查研究的结果

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Preventive Medicine Reports Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102917
Jennifer SN Tang , Helen ML Frazer , Katrina Kunicki , Prabhathi Basnayake , Maho Omori , Jocelyn Lippey
{"title":"澳大利亚医护人员对乳腺筛查中人工智能的看法:混合方法调查研究的结果","authors":"Jennifer SN Tang ,&nbsp;Helen ML Frazer ,&nbsp;Katrina Kunicki ,&nbsp;Prabhathi Basnayake ,&nbsp;Maho Omori ,&nbsp;Jocelyn Lippey","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The evolving role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medicine, particularly in radiology and population-based breast cancer screening programs, offers potential accuracy gains and efficiency improvements. However, successful implementation requires understanding of healthcare workers’ views on AI, which this study aims to explore within the Australian BreastScreen program.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An online survey was distributed to clinical staff involved in breast imaging, collecting responses from November 2022 to April 2023. The survey encompassed demographic information, opinions, and experiences with AI in medical imaging, with questions covering various scenarios of AI integration in BreastScreen.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of an estimated 350 professionals contacted, 95 responded, with 84.2 % (80/95) being radiologists. Less than half of respondents (44.9 %, 40/89) had worked with artificial intelligence for image classification previously. The majority of radiologists 74.2 % (46/62) thought that the use of AI in reading mammograms for BreastScreen would improve workflow. However, radiologists thought they would behave with increasing caution with scenarios where AI was more autonomous, with the majority of radiologists (63.3 %, 38/60) uncomfortable with holding accountability when the AI was used to triage and remove cases from the workflow. Notably, 60 % of radiologists (36/60) expressed concerns about accountability.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The findings suggest an optimistic attitude towards AI among Australian healthcare workers, although when given hypothetical scenarios for the way AI could be integrated into BreastScreen, there was increasing caution with scenarios where AI was more autonomous. This study highlights understanding and concerns of healthcare professionals working in population screening which are important to address when implementing AI into the healthcare system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38066,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Medicine Reports","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 102917"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australian healthcare workers’ views on artificial intelligence in BreastScreen: Results of a mixed method survey study\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer SN Tang ,&nbsp;Helen ML Frazer ,&nbsp;Katrina Kunicki ,&nbsp;Prabhathi Basnayake ,&nbsp;Maho Omori ,&nbsp;Jocelyn Lippey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The evolving role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medicine, particularly in radiology and population-based breast cancer screening programs, offers potential accuracy gains and efficiency improvements. However, successful implementation requires understanding of healthcare workers’ views on AI, which this study aims to explore within the Australian BreastScreen program.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An online survey was distributed to clinical staff involved in breast imaging, collecting responses from November 2022 to April 2023. The survey encompassed demographic information, opinions, and experiences with AI in medical imaging, with questions covering various scenarios of AI integration in BreastScreen.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of an estimated 350 professionals contacted, 95 responded, with 84.2 % (80/95) being radiologists. Less than half of respondents (44.9 %, 40/89) had worked with artificial intelligence for image classification previously. The majority of radiologists 74.2 % (46/62) thought that the use of AI in reading mammograms for BreastScreen would improve workflow. However, radiologists thought they would behave with increasing caution with scenarios where AI was more autonomous, with the majority of radiologists (63.3 %, 38/60) uncomfortable with holding accountability when the AI was used to triage and remove cases from the workflow. Notably, 60 % of radiologists (36/60) expressed concerns about accountability.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The findings suggest an optimistic attitude towards AI among Australian healthcare workers, although when given hypothetical scenarios for the way AI could be integrated into BreastScreen, there was increasing caution with scenarios where AI was more autonomous. This study highlights understanding and concerns of healthcare professionals working in population screening which are important to address when implementing AI into the healthcare system.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive Medicine Reports\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102917\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive Medicine Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335524003322\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Medicine Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335524003322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言人工智能(AI)在医学领域,尤其是放射学和基于人群的乳腺癌筛查项目中不断发展的作用为提高准确性和效率提供了潜力。然而,要想成功实施人工智能,就必须了解医护人员对人工智能的看法,本研究旨在澳大利亚乳腺癌筛查项目中探讨这一问题。方法向参与乳腺成像的临床工作人员发放在线调查问卷,收集 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 4 月期间的回复。调查内容包括人口统计学信息、观点以及在医学影像领域使用人工智能的经验,问题涉及将人工智能集成到 BreastScreen 中的各种情况。结果在联系的约 350 名专业人员中,95 人做出了回复,其中 84.2% (80/95)为放射科医生。不到一半的受访者(44.9%,40/89)以前使用过人工智能进行图像分类。大多数放射科医生(74.2%,46/62)认为,使用人工智能为乳腺筛查读取乳房 X 线照片将改善工作流程。但是,放射科医生认为,在人工智能更加自主的情况下,他们的行为会越来越谨慎,大多数放射科医生(63.3%,38/60)对人工智能用于分流和从工作流程中移除病例时的责任感感到不安。值得注意的是,60% 的放射科医生(36/60)对问责制表示担忧。讨论研究结果表明,澳大利亚医护人员对人工智能持乐观态度,尽管在假设人工智能可以集成到 BreastScreen 中的情况下,他们对人工智能更加自主的情况越来越谨慎。本研究强调了从事人群筛查工作的医疗保健专业人员对人工智能的理解和担忧,这对于在医疗保健系统中实施人工智能非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Australian healthcare workers’ views on artificial intelligence in BreastScreen: Results of a mixed method survey study

Introduction

The evolving role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medicine, particularly in radiology and population-based breast cancer screening programs, offers potential accuracy gains and efficiency improvements. However, successful implementation requires understanding of healthcare workers’ views on AI, which this study aims to explore within the Australian BreastScreen program.

Methods

An online survey was distributed to clinical staff involved in breast imaging, collecting responses from November 2022 to April 2023. The survey encompassed demographic information, opinions, and experiences with AI in medical imaging, with questions covering various scenarios of AI integration in BreastScreen.

Results

Out of an estimated 350 professionals contacted, 95 responded, with 84.2 % (80/95) being radiologists. Less than half of respondents (44.9 %, 40/89) had worked with artificial intelligence for image classification previously. The majority of radiologists 74.2 % (46/62) thought that the use of AI in reading mammograms for BreastScreen would improve workflow. However, radiologists thought they would behave with increasing caution with scenarios where AI was more autonomous, with the majority of radiologists (63.3 %, 38/60) uncomfortable with holding accountability when the AI was used to triage and remove cases from the workflow. Notably, 60 % of radiologists (36/60) expressed concerns about accountability.

Discussion

The findings suggest an optimistic attitude towards AI among Australian healthcare workers, although when given hypothetical scenarios for the way AI could be integrated into BreastScreen, there was increasing caution with scenarios where AI was more autonomous. This study highlights understanding and concerns of healthcare professionals working in population screening which are important to address when implementing AI into the healthcare system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive Medicine Reports
Preventive Medicine Reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
期刊最新文献
Changes in public awareness of the social determinants of health over 15 years in Wisconsin, United States. Smoke-free hospitality environments and cognitive health: A population-based study in the United States. The prevalence and burden of musculoskeletal disorders amongst Indigenous people in Pimicikamak, northern Manitoba, Canada: A community health survey. General practitioner-centered rural obesity management: Design, protocol and baseline data of the German HAPpEN pragmatic trial. A socioecological taxonomy of determinants to colorectal cancer screening in black men: Insights from a mixed-methods systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1