甲烷报告要求、排放源和监测方法的描述和分类框架†。

IF 2.8 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental science: atmospheres Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1039/D4EA00120F
Andy Connor, Jacob T. Shaw, Nigel Yarrow, Neil Howes, Jon Helmore, Andrew Finlayson, Patrick Barker and Rod Robinson
{"title":"甲烷报告要求、排放源和监测方法的描述和分类框架†。","authors":"Andy Connor, Jacob T. Shaw, Nigel Yarrow, Neil Howes, Jon Helmore, Andrew Finlayson, Patrick Barker and Rod Robinson","doi":"10.1039/D4EA00120F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Industries, governments, and regulators need trustworthy emissions data to enable them to make informed decisions regarding methane abatement strategy and policies. There are many differing data reporting metrics, as well as a diverse range of both emission sources and methods for monitoring emissions. Different data structures and terminologies can be used to describe similar objects, activities, or characteristics associated with methane monitoring. There is no currently accepted definition of what constitutes a methane monitoring method. Since there is no common basis to describe this information, confusion concerning language, definitions, and terminology can arise which can undermine confidence in data. This paper describes a framework, based on a set of taxonomies and a common lexicon, which aims to address these issues by providing a common structure in which data requirements, emission sources and monitoring methods can be described. The principles of metrology and quality assurance are embedded into this framework along with a means to define the temporal and spatial scales of the reporting and monitoring. It is envisaged that this framework will be developed into a standard to help facilitate more reliable transfer of information between stakeholders internationally. Usage examples for this framework include: to aid the development of test standards (between test laboratories, site operators, and standards bodies); to help ensure the most cost-effective monitoring methods are deployed for a specific purpose; to help identify technological and methodological gaps between what monitoring is needed and what is available, or to help drive more focused innovation in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":72942,"journal":{"name":"Environmental science: atmospheres","volume":" 11","pages":" 1203-1217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ea/d4ea00120f?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework for describing and classifying methane reporting requirements, emission sources, and monitoring methods†\",\"authors\":\"Andy Connor, Jacob T. Shaw, Nigel Yarrow, Neil Howes, Jon Helmore, Andrew Finlayson, Patrick Barker and Rod Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4EA00120F\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Industries, governments, and regulators need trustworthy emissions data to enable them to make informed decisions regarding methane abatement strategy and policies. There are many differing data reporting metrics, as well as a diverse range of both emission sources and methods for monitoring emissions. Different data structures and terminologies can be used to describe similar objects, activities, or characteristics associated with methane monitoring. There is no currently accepted definition of what constitutes a methane monitoring method. Since there is no common basis to describe this information, confusion concerning language, definitions, and terminology can arise which can undermine confidence in data. This paper describes a framework, based on a set of taxonomies and a common lexicon, which aims to address these issues by providing a common structure in which data requirements, emission sources and monitoring methods can be described. The principles of metrology and quality assurance are embedded into this framework along with a means to define the temporal and spatial scales of the reporting and monitoring. It is envisaged that this framework will be developed into a standard to help facilitate more reliable transfer of information between stakeholders internationally. Usage examples for this framework include: to aid the development of test standards (between test laboratories, site operators, and standards bodies); to help ensure the most cost-effective monitoring methods are deployed for a specific purpose; to help identify technological and methodological gaps between what monitoring is needed and what is available, or to help drive more focused innovation in this field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental science: atmospheres\",\"volume\":\" 11\",\"pages\":\" 1203-1217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ea/d4ea00120f?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental science: atmospheres\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ea/d4ea00120f\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental science: atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ea/d4ea00120f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行业、政府和监管机构需要可靠的排放数据,以便就甲烷减排战略和政策做出明智的决策。有许多不同的数据报告指标,以及各种排放源和排放监控方法。不同的数据结构和术语可用于描述与甲烷监测相关的类似对象、活动或特征。对于什么是甲烷监测方法,目前还没有公认的定义。由于没有共同的基础来描述这些信息,因此可能会出现语言、定义和术语方面的混乱,从而影响对数据的信心。本文介绍了一个基于一套分类标准和通用词汇的框架,旨在通过提供一个通用结构来描述数据要求、排放源和监测方法,从而解决这些问题。该框架包含计量和质量保证原则,以及确定报告和监测的时间和空间范围的方法。预计该框架将发展成为一个标准,以帮助促进利益相关者之间在国际范围内更可靠地传递信息。该框架的使用实例包括:帮助制定测试标准(测试实验室、现场操作人员和标准机构之间);帮助确保为特定目的部署最具成本效益的监测方法;帮助确定所需监测与现有监测之间的技术和方法差距,或帮助推动该领域更有针对性的创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A framework for describing and classifying methane reporting requirements, emission sources, and monitoring methods†

Industries, governments, and regulators need trustworthy emissions data to enable them to make informed decisions regarding methane abatement strategy and policies. There are many differing data reporting metrics, as well as a diverse range of both emission sources and methods for monitoring emissions. Different data structures and terminologies can be used to describe similar objects, activities, or characteristics associated with methane monitoring. There is no currently accepted definition of what constitutes a methane monitoring method. Since there is no common basis to describe this information, confusion concerning language, definitions, and terminology can arise which can undermine confidence in data. This paper describes a framework, based on a set of taxonomies and a common lexicon, which aims to address these issues by providing a common structure in which data requirements, emission sources and monitoring methods can be described. The principles of metrology and quality assurance are embedded into this framework along with a means to define the temporal and spatial scales of the reporting and monitoring. It is envisaged that this framework will be developed into a standard to help facilitate more reliable transfer of information between stakeholders internationally. Usage examples for this framework include: to aid the development of test standards (between test laboratories, site operators, and standards bodies); to help ensure the most cost-effective monitoring methods are deployed for a specific purpose; to help identify technological and methodological gaps between what monitoring is needed and what is available, or to help drive more focused innovation in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Back cover Real-time chemical characterization of primary and aged biomass burning aerosols derived from sub-Saharan African biomass fuels in smoldering fires. A framework for describing and classifying methane reporting requirements, emission sources, and monitoring methods† Does gas-phase sulfur dioxide remove films of atmosphere-extracted organic material from the aqueous aerosol air–water interface?† Enhanced detection of aromatic oxidation products using NO3 - chemical ionization mass spectrometry with limited nitric acid.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1