印度哈里亚纳邦法里达巴德 PM2.5 重金属健康风险评估:工业视角

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1007/s10661-024-13317-3
Neha Yadav, Somvir Bajar, Sakshi Gupta, Narayanasamy Vijayan, Sudhir Kumar Sharma
{"title":"印度哈里亚纳邦法里达巴德 PM2.5 重金属健康风险评估:工业视角","authors":"Neha Yadav,&nbsp;Somvir Bajar,&nbsp;Sakshi Gupta,&nbsp;Narayanasamy Vijayan,&nbsp;Sudhir Kumar Sharma","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13317-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study is focused on investigating the heavy/toxic metals (Al, Ni, Cr, Pb, Cu, As, Mn, and Zn) of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and assessing their associated human health risks. During the study period (July 2022 to July 2023), the PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples were collected from two distinct sites in Faridabad (92 samples from site 1 and 85 samples from site 2). In this study, the US EPA’s <i>Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund</i> (RAGS) was followed to evaluate the human health risk associated with PM<sub>2.5</sub>-bound heavy elements. The annual average of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations was 108 ± 16 µg m⁻<sup>3</sup> at site 1 and 154 ± 11 µg m⁻<sup>3</sup> at site 2, approximately three to four times higher than the national ambient air quality standards (annual, 40 µg m<sup>−3</sup>). The analysis of enrichment factors (EFs) for the elements Cr, As, Zn, Cu, Mn, Pb, and Ni indicates that the heavy elements associated with PM<sub>2.5</sub> primarily originate from anthropogenic sources. The application of the conditional bivariate probability function (CBPF) model for Faridabad revealed local pollution sources contributing to elevated mass concentrations at the receptor site from the southern (S), northwestern (NW), northeastern (NE), southwestern (SW), and southeastern (SE) regions. Furthermore, positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis identified the predominant sources of PM<sub>2.5</sub>-bound heavy elements as industrial emissions (41%), vehicular emissions (34%), and combustion processes (25%). After a thorough assessment of health hazards, Cr appeared as a significant carcinogenic risk factor. Children with elevated hazard quotient (HQ) values for Mn and Cr indicated non-carcinogenic health problems. Ultimately, this analysis reinforces the necessity for rigorous monitoring and intervention to safeguard public health from the potentially harmful effects of heavy elements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"196 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating health risks of PM2.5-bound heavy elements in Faridabad, Haryana (India): an industrial perspective\",\"authors\":\"Neha Yadav,&nbsp;Somvir Bajar,&nbsp;Sakshi Gupta,&nbsp;Narayanasamy Vijayan,&nbsp;Sudhir Kumar Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10661-024-13317-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present study is focused on investigating the heavy/toxic metals (Al, Ni, Cr, Pb, Cu, As, Mn, and Zn) of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and assessing their associated human health risks. During the study period (July 2022 to July 2023), the PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples were collected from two distinct sites in Faridabad (92 samples from site 1 and 85 samples from site 2). In this study, the US EPA’s <i>Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund</i> (RAGS) was followed to evaluate the human health risk associated with PM<sub>2.5</sub>-bound heavy elements. The annual average of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations was 108 ± 16 µg m⁻<sup>3</sup> at site 1 and 154 ± 11 µg m⁻<sup>3</sup> at site 2, approximately three to four times higher than the national ambient air quality standards (annual, 40 µg m<sup>−3</sup>). The analysis of enrichment factors (EFs) for the elements Cr, As, Zn, Cu, Mn, Pb, and Ni indicates that the heavy elements associated with PM<sub>2.5</sub> primarily originate from anthropogenic sources. The application of the conditional bivariate probability function (CBPF) model for Faridabad revealed local pollution sources contributing to elevated mass concentrations at the receptor site from the southern (S), northwestern (NW), northeastern (NE), southwestern (SW), and southeastern (SE) regions. Furthermore, positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis identified the predominant sources of PM<sub>2.5</sub>-bound heavy elements as industrial emissions (41%), vehicular emissions (34%), and combustion processes (25%). After a thorough assessment of health hazards, Cr appeared as a significant carcinogenic risk factor. Children with elevated hazard quotient (HQ) values for Mn and Cr indicated non-carcinogenic health problems. Ultimately, this analysis reinforces the necessity for rigorous monitoring and intervention to safeguard public health from the potentially harmful effects of heavy elements.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"volume\":\"196 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13317-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13317-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是调查 PM2.5 中的重金属/有毒金属(铝、镍、铬、铅、铜、砷、锰和锌),并评估与之相关的人类健康风险。在研究期间(2022 年 7 月至 2023 年 7 月),PM2.5 样本从法里达巴德的两个不同地点收集(92 个样本来自 1 号地点,85 个样本来自 2 号地点)。在这项研究中,美国环保局的《超级基金风险评估指南》(RAGS)被用来评估与 PM2.5 结合的重元素对人类健康造成的风险。遗址 1 和遗址 2 的 PM2.5 年平均浓度分别为 108 ± 16 µg m-3 和 154 ± 11 µg m-3,比国家环境空气质量标准(年均 40 µg m-3)高出约三至四倍。对 Cr、As、Zn、Cu、Mn、Pb 和 Ni 等元素的富集因子 (EF) 分析表明,与 PM2.5 相关的重元素主要来自人为来源。法里达巴德条件双变量概率函数(CBPF)模型的应用显示,导致受体点质量浓度升高的本地污染源来自南部(S)、西北部(NW)、东北部(NE)、西南部(SW)和东南部(SE)地区。此外,正矩阵因式分解(PMF)分析确定了 PM2.5 重元素的主要来源为工业排放(41%)、车辆排放(34%)和燃烧过程(25%)。在对健康危害进行全面评估后,铬成为一个重要的致癌风险因素。锰和铬的危害商数(HQ)值升高的儿童则存在非致癌健康问题。最终,这项分析加强了严格监测和干预的必要性,以保障公众健康免受重元素的潜在有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating health risks of PM2.5-bound heavy elements in Faridabad, Haryana (India): an industrial perspective

The present study is focused on investigating the heavy/toxic metals (Al, Ni, Cr, Pb, Cu, As, Mn, and Zn) of PM2.5 and assessing their associated human health risks. During the study period (July 2022 to July 2023), the PM2.5 samples were collected from two distinct sites in Faridabad (92 samples from site 1 and 85 samples from site 2). In this study, the US EPA’s Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) was followed to evaluate the human health risk associated with PM2.5-bound heavy elements. The annual average of PM2.5 concentrations was 108 ± 16 µg m⁻3 at site 1 and 154 ± 11 µg m⁻3 at site 2, approximately three to four times higher than the national ambient air quality standards (annual, 40 µg m−3). The analysis of enrichment factors (EFs) for the elements Cr, As, Zn, Cu, Mn, Pb, and Ni indicates that the heavy elements associated with PM2.5 primarily originate from anthropogenic sources. The application of the conditional bivariate probability function (CBPF) model for Faridabad revealed local pollution sources contributing to elevated mass concentrations at the receptor site from the southern (S), northwestern (NW), northeastern (NE), southwestern (SW), and southeastern (SE) regions. Furthermore, positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis identified the predominant sources of PM2.5-bound heavy elements as industrial emissions (41%), vehicular emissions (34%), and combustion processes (25%). After a thorough assessment of health hazards, Cr appeared as a significant carcinogenic risk factor. Children with elevated hazard quotient (HQ) values for Mn and Cr indicated non-carcinogenic health problems. Ultimately, this analysis reinforces the necessity for rigorous monitoring and intervention to safeguard public health from the potentially harmful effects of heavy elements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
期刊最新文献
Heavy metal(loid)s pollution in soils of a typical agricultural and rural area: Source apportionment and derived risk quantification Spatial distribution patterns and hotspots of extreme agro-climatic resources in the Horro Guduru Wollega Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia Health risks and pathological effects of heavy metals in Oreochromis mossambicus from Usuma River, Nigeria Comprehensive assessment of fish diversity and water health in river Indus, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan Enhanced removal of methyl orange and malachite green using mesoporous TO@CTAB nanocomposite: Synthesis, characterization, optimization and real wastewater treatment efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1