碳市场一体化、生产力和福利:定量分析

IF 5.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Surveys Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1111/joes.12637
Yuying Liu, Yongjin Wang, Xiaofan Li
{"title":"碳市场一体化、生产力和福利:定量分析","authors":"Yuying Liu,&nbsp;Yongjin Wang,&nbsp;Xiaofan Li","doi":"10.1111/joes.12637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>China's carbon market is far from being integrated. This paper studies how carbon emissions reduction and carbon market integration affect China's aggregate productivity and welfare via a quantitative spatial general equilibrium model with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>CO</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm CO}_2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> as a by-product of production. We find that (1) were carbon emission rights to be allowed to be traded across regions, (i) if there is no technological growth, China's overall productivity and real GDP would increase by 10.26%, and 27.19% respectively, and welfare would decline slightly by 0.92%; (ii) if the technology grows at the present growth rate, China's total output, real GDP and welfare would increase by 9.97, 38.57, and 7.79%, respectively; (2) were nine regional carbon trading markets integrated, China's overall productivity, real GDP and welfare would increase by 4.35, 29.17, and 7.75%, respectively.  Carbon market integration enables China to achieve economic development at a lower <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>CO</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm CO}_2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":51374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Surveys","volume":"38 5","pages":"1819-1845"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon market integration, productivity, and welfare: A quantitative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yuying Liu,&nbsp;Yongjin Wang,&nbsp;Xiaofan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joes.12637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>China's carbon market is far from being integrated. This paper studies how carbon emissions reduction and carbon market integration affect China's aggregate productivity and welfare via a quantitative spatial general equilibrium model with <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>CO</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${\\\\rm CO}_2$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> as a by-product of production. We find that (1) were carbon emission rights to be allowed to be traded across regions, (i) if there is no technological growth, China's overall productivity and real GDP would increase by 10.26%, and 27.19% respectively, and welfare would decline slightly by 0.92%; (ii) if the technology grows at the present growth rate, China's total output, real GDP and welfare would increase by 9.97, 38.57, and 7.79%, respectively; (2) were nine regional carbon trading markets integrated, China's overall productivity, real GDP and welfare would increase by 4.35, 29.17, and 7.75%, respectively.  Carbon market integration enables China to achieve economic development at a lower <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>CO</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${\\\\rm CO}_2$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Surveys\",\"volume\":\"38 5\",\"pages\":\"1819-1845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Surveys\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joes.12637\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joes.12637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国的碳市场远未实现一体化。本文通过一个定量空间一般均衡模型,以二氧化碳 ${\rm CO}_2$ 为生产副产品,研究碳减排和碳市场一体化如何影响中国的总体生产率和福利。我们发现:(1) 如果允许碳排放权跨地区交易,(i) 如果没有技术增长,中国的总体生产率和实际 GDP 将分别提高 10.26% 和 27.19%,福利将略微下降 0.92%;(ii) 如果允许碳排放权跨地区交易,如果没有技术增长,中国的总体生产率和实际 GDP 将分别提高 10.26% 和 27.19%,福利将略微下降 0.92%。92%;②如果技术以目前的增长率增长,中国的总产出、实际 GDP 和福利将分别增长 9.97%、38.57%和 7.79%;②如果 9 个区域碳交易市场实现一体化,中国的总体生产率、实际 GDP 和福利将分别增长 4.35%、29.17%和 7.75%。 碳市场一体化使中国能够以较低的二氧化碳排放成本实现经济发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carbon market integration, productivity, and welfare: A quantitative analysis

China's carbon market is far from being integrated. This paper studies how carbon emissions reduction and carbon market integration affect China's aggregate productivity and welfare via a quantitative spatial general equilibrium model with CO 2 ${\rm CO}_2$ as a by-product of production. We find that (1) were carbon emission rights to be allowed to be traded across regions, (i) if there is no technological growth, China's overall productivity and real GDP would increase by 10.26%, and 27.19% respectively, and welfare would decline slightly by 0.92%; (ii) if the technology grows at the present growth rate, China's total output, real GDP and welfare would increase by 9.97, 38.57, and 7.79%, respectively; (2) were nine regional carbon trading markets integrated, China's overall productivity, real GDP and welfare would increase by 4.35, 29.17, and 7.75%, respectively.  Carbon market integration enables China to achieve economic development at a lower CO 2 ${\rm CO}_2$ cost.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: As economics becomes increasingly specialized, communication amongst economists becomes even more important. The Journal of Economic Surveys seeks to improve the communication of new ideas. It provides a means by which economists can keep abreast of recent developments beyond their immediate specialization. Areas covered include: - economics - econometrics - economic history - business economics
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Beyond fads and magic bullets: The promise of behavioral approaches in development economics Climate change, institution, and the economy Measuring multinational production with foreign direct investment statistics: A survey of challenges and recent developments Why do famines still occur in the 21st Century? A review on the causes of extreme food insecurity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1