新型环甲膜压力传感器装置可提高塞利克氏操作中食道闭塞的效果:随机对照试验。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002097
Abhilasha Mishra, Vighnesh Ashok, Goverdhan D Puri, Neelesh Kumar, Preethy J Mathew
{"title":"新型环甲膜压力传感器装置可提高塞利克氏操作中食道闭塞的效果:随机对照试验。","authors":"Abhilasha Mishra, Vighnesh Ashok, Goverdhan D Puri, Neelesh Kumar, Preethy J Mathew","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inability to measure the force applied during cricoid pressure is an important limitation in clinical practice. We developed a novel device to measure this force and provide real-time feedback to the operator.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To test the hypothesis of superior oesophageal occlusion during cricoid pressure when guided by the novel device as compared with conventional practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary University Hospital, May to December 2021.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Sixty-five ASA I/II adult patients of either sex scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring tracheal intubation. Patients with comorbidities involving the neck, those at risk of pulmonary aspiration, anticipated difficult airway and BMI at least 35 kg  m -2 were excluded.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Operators applied cricoid pressure with their fingers in both groups. Participants were randomised into 'feedback group' where the operator adjusted this force based on the force measured by the novel device, and 'control group' where the force measured by the device was shielded from the operator.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the rate of occlusion of oesophageal opening assessed by whether a 12 CH orogastric tube could be inserted into the oesophageal entrance during videolaryngoscopy. Secondary outcomes included the magnitudes of force measured during cricoid pressure, oesophageal diameter measured ultrasonographically during cricoid pressure and intubation parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four patients completed the study. The oesophageal opening was occluded in significantly more patients in the feedback group compared with the control group (94 vs. 6%; P  = 0.001). The mean ± SD force (N) applied was significantly better and consistent at all time points in the feedback group compared to the control group (22.65 ± 7.81 vs. 14.57 ± 11.13, P  < 0.001). The median [IQR] anteroposterior diameter of the oesophagus during cricoid pressure was less in the feedback group compared to the control group (0.49 [0.36 to 0.56] vs. 0.57 [0.48 to 0.65], P  = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the novel sensor device achieved a significantly high rate of oesophageal occlusion during application of cricoid pressure.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2021/05/033484).</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"265-274"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel cricoid pressure sensor device enhances the efficacy of oesophageal occlusion during Sellick's manoeuvre: A randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Abhilasha Mishra, Vighnesh Ashok, Goverdhan D Puri, Neelesh Kumar, Preethy J Mathew\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inability to measure the force applied during cricoid pressure is an important limitation in clinical practice. We developed a novel device to measure this force and provide real-time feedback to the operator.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To test the hypothesis of superior oesophageal occlusion during cricoid pressure when guided by the novel device as compared with conventional practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary University Hospital, May to December 2021.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Sixty-five ASA I/II adult patients of either sex scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring tracheal intubation. Patients with comorbidities involving the neck, those at risk of pulmonary aspiration, anticipated difficult airway and BMI at least 35 kg  m -2 were excluded.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Operators applied cricoid pressure with their fingers in both groups. Participants were randomised into 'feedback group' where the operator adjusted this force based on the force measured by the novel device, and 'control group' where the force measured by the device was shielded from the operator.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the rate of occlusion of oesophageal opening assessed by whether a 12 CH orogastric tube could be inserted into the oesophageal entrance during videolaryngoscopy. Secondary outcomes included the magnitudes of force measured during cricoid pressure, oesophageal diameter measured ultrasonographically during cricoid pressure and intubation parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four patients completed the study. The oesophageal opening was occluded in significantly more patients in the feedback group compared with the control group (94 vs. 6%; P  = 0.001). The mean ± SD force (N) applied was significantly better and consistent at all time points in the feedback group compared to the control group (22.65 ± 7.81 vs. 14.57 ± 11.13, P  < 0.001). The median [IQR] anteroposterior diameter of the oesophagus during cricoid pressure was less in the feedback group compared to the control group (0.49 [0.36 to 0.56] vs. 0.57 [0.48 to 0.65], P  = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the novel sensor device achieved a significantly high rate of oesophageal occlusion during application of cricoid pressure.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2021/05/033484).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"265-274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002097\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在临床实践中,无法测量环甲膜加压时的作用力是一个重要的限制因素。我们开发了一种新型设备来测量这种力量,并向操作者提供实时反馈:与传统做法相比,测试新型设备引导环状舌骨加压时食道上段闭塞的假设:设计:前瞻性随机对照试验:地点:三级大学医院,2021年5月至12月:65 名 ASA I/II 级成年男女患者,计划在全身麻醉下进行需要气管插管的择期手术。排除合并颈部疾病、有肺吸入风险、预计气道困难和体重指数至少为 35 kg m-2 的患者:干预措施:两组患者均由操作者用手指按压环状软骨。参与者被随机分为 "反馈组 "和 "对照组"。"反馈组 "中,操作者根据新型设备测得的力来调整压力;"对照组 "中,设备测得的力不对操作者开放:主要结果是食道开口闭塞率,通过视频喉镜检查时是否能将 12 腔胃管插入食道入口进行评估。次要结果包括环状压迫时测量到的力的大小、环状压迫时超声波测量到的食道直径以及插管参数:结果:64 名患者完成了研究。与对照组相比,反馈组食道开口闭塞的患者明显更多(94% 对 6%;P = 0.001)。与对照组相比,反馈组患者在所有时间点的平均(±SD)施力(牛顿)明显更好且更一致(22.65±7.81 对 14.57±11.13,P 结论:反馈组患者的施力(牛顿)在所有时间点都明显更好且更一致(22.65±7.81 对 14.57±11.13,P):使用新型传感器设备在施加环状舌骨压力时实现了明显较高的食道闭塞率:试验注册:印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI/2021/05/033484)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel cricoid pressure sensor device enhances the efficacy of oesophageal occlusion during Sellick's manoeuvre: A randomised controlled trial.

Background: The inability to measure the force applied during cricoid pressure is an important limitation in clinical practice. We developed a novel device to measure this force and provide real-time feedback to the operator.

Objectives: To test the hypothesis of superior oesophageal occlusion during cricoid pressure when guided by the novel device as compared with conventional practice.

Design: A prospective randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Tertiary University Hospital, May to December 2021.

Patients: Sixty-five ASA I/II adult patients of either sex scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring tracheal intubation. Patients with comorbidities involving the neck, those at risk of pulmonary aspiration, anticipated difficult airway and BMI at least 35 kg  m -2 were excluded.

Intervention: Operators applied cricoid pressure with their fingers in both groups. Participants were randomised into 'feedback group' where the operator adjusted this force based on the force measured by the novel device, and 'control group' where the force measured by the device was shielded from the operator.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the rate of occlusion of oesophageal opening assessed by whether a 12 CH orogastric tube could be inserted into the oesophageal entrance during videolaryngoscopy. Secondary outcomes included the magnitudes of force measured during cricoid pressure, oesophageal diameter measured ultrasonographically during cricoid pressure and intubation parameters.

Results: Sixty-four patients completed the study. The oesophageal opening was occluded in significantly more patients in the feedback group compared with the control group (94 vs. 6%; P  = 0.001). The mean ± SD force (N) applied was significantly better and consistent at all time points in the feedback group compared to the control group (22.65 ± 7.81 vs. 14.57 ± 11.13, P  < 0.001). The median [IQR] anteroposterior diameter of the oesophagus during cricoid pressure was less in the feedback group compared to the control group (0.49 [0.36 to 0.56] vs. 0.57 [0.48 to 0.65], P  = 0.006).

Conclusions: The use of the novel sensor device achieved a significantly high rate of oesophageal occlusion during application of cricoid pressure.

Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2021/05/033484).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
期刊最新文献
Subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for epigastric cardiac pacemaker operation: A randomised controlled trial. Comparison between ultrasound-guided intertransverse process and erector spinae plane blocks for breast cancer surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Postoperative lymphopaenia as a risk factor for postoperative infections in cancer surgery: A prospective multicentre cohort study (the EVALYMPH study). A novel cricoid pressure sensor device enhances the efficacy of oesophageal occlusion during Sellick's manoeuvre: A randomised controlled trial. Co-administration of dexmedetomidine with total intravenous anaesthesia in carotid endarterectomy reduces requirements for propofol and improves haemodynamic stability: A single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1