{"title":"在 3-D 打印的水生 T 型迷宫中,片脚类动物(假鳃螈)没有表现出左右偏好。","authors":"Joshua E. Wolf, Melissa Larsen","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Crustaceans are increasingly used as research subjects in experiments investigating learning in invertebrates. While many of these species may be useful models it is essential to document the presence or absence of behavioral laterality, especially considering the long-held belief that functional lateralization was unique to humans or other vertebrate species. Neglecting this fundamental step weakens the applicability of results and may unnecessarily complicate experimental design. Amphipods (<em>Gammarus pseudolimnaeus)</em> may be a useful invertebrate for studying simple discriminations or escape behavior, but research on their potential behavioral laterality is absent. The current study investigated whether amphipods demonstrate a left-right bias when navigating an aquatic T-maze by placing them in the maze and recording their choices across multiple trials. Our results suggested that amphipods do not show a strong left-right bias during initial navigation of an aquatic T-maze. These findings may encourage other researchers to test invertebrates for behavioral laterality, utilize amphipods in studies of simple forms of learning, and potentially simplify future experimental design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8746,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Processes","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 105123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amphipods (Gammarus pseudolimnaeus) do not demonstrate a left-right preference in a 3-D printed aquatic T-maze\",\"authors\":\"Joshua E. Wolf, Melissa Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Crustaceans are increasingly used as research subjects in experiments investigating learning in invertebrates. While many of these species may be useful models it is essential to document the presence or absence of behavioral laterality, especially considering the long-held belief that functional lateralization was unique to humans or other vertebrate species. Neglecting this fundamental step weakens the applicability of results and may unnecessarily complicate experimental design. Amphipods (<em>Gammarus pseudolimnaeus)</em> may be a useful invertebrate for studying simple discriminations or escape behavior, but research on their potential behavioral laterality is absent. The current study investigated whether amphipods demonstrate a left-right bias when navigating an aquatic T-maze by placing them in the maze and recording their choices across multiple trials. Our results suggested that amphipods do not show a strong left-right bias during initial navigation of an aquatic T-maze. These findings may encourage other researchers to test invertebrates for behavioral laterality, utilize amphipods in studies of simple forms of learning, and potentially simplify future experimental design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"volume\":\"223 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635724001384\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Processes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635724001384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在研究无脊椎动物学习能力的实验中,甲壳类动物越来越多地被用作研究对象。虽然这些物种中有许多可能是有用的模型,但记录行为侧向性的存在与否至关重要,特别是考虑到长期以来人们一直认为功能侧向性是人类或其他脊椎动物物种所独有的。忽略这一基本步骤会削弱结果的适用性,并可能不必要地使实验设计复杂化。片脚类动物(Gammarus pseudolimnaeus)可能是研究简单辨别或逃逸行为的一种有用的无脊椎动物,但对其潜在的行为侧向性却缺乏研究。本研究通过将片脚类动物置于迷宫中并记录它们在多次试验中的选择,研究了片脚类动物在水生 T 型迷宫中导航时是否表现出左右偏向。我们的研究结果表明,片脚类动物在水生 T 型迷宫的初始导航过程中不会表现出强烈的左右偏向。这些发现可能会鼓励其他研究人员测试无脊椎动物的行为侧向性,利用片脚类动物研究简单的学习形式,并有可能简化未来的实验设计。
Amphipods (Gammarus pseudolimnaeus) do not demonstrate a left-right preference in a 3-D printed aquatic T-maze
Crustaceans are increasingly used as research subjects in experiments investigating learning in invertebrates. While many of these species may be useful models it is essential to document the presence or absence of behavioral laterality, especially considering the long-held belief that functional lateralization was unique to humans or other vertebrate species. Neglecting this fundamental step weakens the applicability of results and may unnecessarily complicate experimental design. Amphipods (Gammarus pseudolimnaeus) may be a useful invertebrate for studying simple discriminations or escape behavior, but research on their potential behavioral laterality is absent. The current study investigated whether amphipods demonstrate a left-right bias when navigating an aquatic T-maze by placing them in the maze and recording their choices across multiple trials. Our results suggested that amphipods do not show a strong left-right bias during initial navigation of an aquatic T-maze. These findings may encourage other researchers to test invertebrates for behavioral laterality, utilize amphipods in studies of simple forms of learning, and potentially simplify future experimental design.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Processes is dedicated to the publication of high-quality original research on animal behaviour from any theoretical perspective. It welcomes contributions that consider animal behaviour from behavioural analytic, cognitive, ethological, ecological and evolutionary points of view. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, and papers that integrate theory and methodology across disciplines are particularly welcome.