经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后服用钠-葡萄糖转运体-2 抑制剂的患者对比度诱发肾病的发生率:观察分析。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1007/s10557-024-07641-6
Emily Kefer, Brian Gulbis, Melanie Madorsky, Phillip Weeks
{"title":"经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后服用钠-葡萄糖转运体-2 抑制剂的患者对比度诱发肾病的发生率:观察分析。","authors":"Emily Kefer, Brian Gulbis, Melanie Madorsky, Phillip Weeks","doi":"10.1007/s10557-024-07641-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors prior to the procedure with a matched cohort of patients not receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, patients were eligible for inclusion if they underwent PCI at any of the included study centers within the study time period. Patients were assigned to either the SGLT-2 inhibitor group or control group depending on the documentation of receiving any SGLT-2 inhibitors within 24 h prior to PCI. Propensity matching was utilized to determine the final subjects to include for comparison. The primary outcome was the incidence of CIN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 192 patients (96 in each group) were matched after exclusion criteria were applied. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar between groups, occurring in 8 (8.3%) patients in the SGLT-2 inhibitor group and 6 (6.3%) patients in the comparator group (p = 0.58). There was also no difference between groups in the change in serum creatinine following PCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our analysis, we did not identify any risk of CIN associated with SGLT-2 inhibitor use prior to PCI. Based on these results and in conjunction with previously published literature, the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors appears safe prior to PCI. These results still warrant further investigation with prospective adequately powered studies to evaluate the incidence of CIN with SGLT-2 inhibitor use in the setting of PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9557,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Incidence of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients on Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Observational Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Kefer, Brian Gulbis, Melanie Madorsky, Phillip Weeks\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10557-024-07641-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors prior to the procedure with a matched cohort of patients not receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, patients were eligible for inclusion if they underwent PCI at any of the included study centers within the study time period. Patients were assigned to either the SGLT-2 inhibitor group or control group depending on the documentation of receiving any SGLT-2 inhibitors within 24 h prior to PCI. Propensity matching was utilized to determine the final subjects to include for comparison. The primary outcome was the incidence of CIN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 192 patients (96 in each group) were matched after exclusion criteria were applied. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar between groups, occurring in 8 (8.3%) patients in the SGLT-2 inhibitor group and 6 (6.3%) patients in the comparator group (p = 0.58). There was also no difference between groups in the change in serum creatinine following PCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our analysis, we did not identify any risk of CIN associated with SGLT-2 inhibitor use prior to PCI. Based on these results and in conjunction with previously published literature, the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors appears safe prior to PCI. These results still warrant further investigation with prospective adequately powered studies to evaluate the incidence of CIN with SGLT-2 inhibitor use in the setting of PCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-024-07641-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-024-07641-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术前服用钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2(SGLT-2)抑制剂的患者与未接受钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2抑制剂治疗的匹配队列患者术后造影剂诱发肾病(CIN)的发生率:在这项回顾性观察研究中,如果患者在研究期间在任何一家研究中心接受了 PCI 治疗,则符合纳入条件。根据 PCI 前 24 小时内接受过任何 SGLT-2 抑制剂治疗的记录,患者被分配到 SGLT-2 抑制剂组或对照组。采用倾向匹配法确定最终纳入比较的受试者。主要结果是CIN的发生率:应用排除标准后,共有 192 名患者(每组 96 名)进行了匹配。两组对比剂诱发肾病的发生率相似,SGLT-2 抑制剂组有 8 例(8.3%)患者发生对比剂诱发肾病,对照组有 6 例(6.3%)患者发生对比剂诱发肾病(P = 0.58)。PCI后血清肌酐的变化在组间也没有差异:根据我们的分析,我们没有发现任何与 PCI 前使用 SGLT-2 抑制剂相关的 CIN 风险。根据这些结果并结合之前发表的文献,PCI 前使用 SGLT-2 抑制剂似乎是安全的。这些结果仍值得进一步研究,通过前瞻性的、有充分支持的研究来评估 PCI 时使用 SGLT-2 抑制剂的 CIN 发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Incidence of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients on Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Observational Analysis.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors prior to the procedure with a matched cohort of patients not receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor therapy.

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, patients were eligible for inclusion if they underwent PCI at any of the included study centers within the study time period. Patients were assigned to either the SGLT-2 inhibitor group or control group depending on the documentation of receiving any SGLT-2 inhibitors within 24 h prior to PCI. Propensity matching was utilized to determine the final subjects to include for comparison. The primary outcome was the incidence of CIN.

Results: A total of 192 patients (96 in each group) were matched after exclusion criteria were applied. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar between groups, occurring in 8 (8.3%) patients in the SGLT-2 inhibitor group and 6 (6.3%) patients in the comparator group (p = 0.58). There was also no difference between groups in the change in serum creatinine following PCI.

Conclusion: Based on our analysis, we did not identify any risk of CIN associated with SGLT-2 inhibitor use prior to PCI. Based on these results and in conjunction with previously published literature, the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors appears safe prior to PCI. These results still warrant further investigation with prospective adequately powered studies to evaluate the incidence of CIN with SGLT-2 inhibitor use in the setting of PCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Designed to objectively cover the process of bench to bedside development of cardiovascular drug, device and cell therapy, and to bring you the information you need most in a timely and useful format, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy takes a fresh and energetic look at advances in this dynamic field. Homing in on the most exciting work being done on new therapeutic agents, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy focusses on developments in atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, ischemic syndromes and arrhythmias. The Journal is an authoritative source of current and relevant information that is indispensable for basic and clinical investigators aiming for novel, breakthrough research as well as for cardiologists seeking to best serve their patients. Providing you with a single, concise reference tool acknowledged to be among the finest in the world, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is listed in Web of Science and PubMed/Medline among other abstracting and indexing services. The regular articles and frequent special topical issues equip you with an up-to-date source defined by the need for accurate information on an ever-evolving field. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is a careful and accurate guide through the maze of new products and therapies which furnishes you with the details on cardiovascular pharmacology that you will refer to time and time again.
期刊最新文献
Beyond the Broken Heart: Exploring Metabolic Anti-ischemic Solutions for Takotsubo Syndrome. Butyrate-Mediated Modulation of Paraoxonase-1 Alleviates Cardiorenometabolic Abnormalities in a Rat Model of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel: Two Controversial Drugs in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Enhancing Glucose Uptake as a Means to Protect the Heart During Cardiopulmonary Bypass or Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1