高分辨率弥散加权磁共振成像检测临床隐匿性早期乳腺癌的性能:一项多读取器研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07537-x
Chae Woon Lee, Hee Jung Shin, Hee Jeong Kim, Seunghee Baek, Seo Young Park, Woo Jung Choi, Eun Young Chae, Joo Hee Cha, Hak Hee Kim, Woo Kyung Moon
{"title":"高分辨率弥散加权磁共振成像检测临床隐匿性早期乳腺癌的性能:一项多读取器研究。","authors":"Chae Woon Lee, Hee Jung Shin, Hee Jeong Kim, Seunghee Baek, Seo Young Park, Woo Jung Choi, Eun Young Chae, Joo Hee Cha, Hak Hee Kim, Woo Kyung Moon","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07537-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare mammography, breast ultrasound (US), high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI (DCE-MRI), and their combinations for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers (EBCs), including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred and three consecutive women with screening imaging-detected early breast cancers (60 pure DCIS, 36 DCIS with microinvasion, and 207 invasive carcinoma less than 20 mm) who underwent breast MRI at 3 T including DW-MRI (b-values of 0, 800 and 1200 s/mm<sup>2</sup>; in-plane resolution, 1.1 × 1.1 mm<sup>2</sup> or 1.3 × 1.3 mm<sup>2</sup>; section thickness, 3 mm) were retrospectively reviewed. Three radiologists independently reviewed each examination. Statistical analysis included Chi-square test, McNemar test for comparison of cancer detection rates, and Fleiss' Kappa for interreader agreement. Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate factors associated with cancer detection on DW-MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall cancer detection rates were 54.8% on mammography, 71.0% on breast US, 81.5% on DW-MRI, and 87.1% on DCE-MRI. On McNemar test, DW-MRI detected more cancers than mammography (adjusted p < 0.001), and its combination with mammography showed a similar cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI combined with mammography (adjusted p = 0.808). On multivariable analysis, histologic type, lesion size, ADC and CNR on DW-MRI were independent factors for cancer detection on DW-MRI. The interreader agreement for cancer detection was moderate to substantial (Fleiss' kappa: 0.52-0.65) across each modality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-resolution DW-MRI plus mammography showed comparable cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult EBCs including DCIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers: a multi-reader study.\",\"authors\":\"Chae Woon Lee, Hee Jung Shin, Hee Jeong Kim, Seunghee Baek, Seo Young Park, Woo Jung Choi, Eun Young Chae, Joo Hee Cha, Hak Hee Kim, Woo Kyung Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-024-07537-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare mammography, breast ultrasound (US), high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI (DCE-MRI), and their combinations for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers (EBCs), including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred and three consecutive women with screening imaging-detected early breast cancers (60 pure DCIS, 36 DCIS with microinvasion, and 207 invasive carcinoma less than 20 mm) who underwent breast MRI at 3 T including DW-MRI (b-values of 0, 800 and 1200 s/mm<sup>2</sup>; in-plane resolution, 1.1 × 1.1 mm<sup>2</sup> or 1.3 × 1.3 mm<sup>2</sup>; section thickness, 3 mm) were retrospectively reviewed. Three radiologists independently reviewed each examination. Statistical analysis included Chi-square test, McNemar test for comparison of cancer detection rates, and Fleiss' Kappa for interreader agreement. Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate factors associated with cancer detection on DW-MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall cancer detection rates were 54.8% on mammography, 71.0% on breast US, 81.5% on DW-MRI, and 87.1% on DCE-MRI. On McNemar test, DW-MRI detected more cancers than mammography (adjusted p < 0.001), and its combination with mammography showed a similar cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI combined with mammography (adjusted p = 0.808). On multivariable analysis, histologic type, lesion size, ADC and CNR on DW-MRI were independent factors for cancer detection on DW-MRI. The interreader agreement for cancer detection was moderate to substantial (Fleiss' kappa: 0.52-0.65) across each modality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-resolution DW-MRI plus mammography showed comparable cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult EBCs including DCIS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07537-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07537-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较乳腺放射摄影、乳腺超声波(US)、高分辨率弥散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)、动态对比增强乳腺磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)及其组合在检测临床隐匿性早期乳腺癌(EBC)(包括导管原位癌(DCIS))方面的效果:对连续接受 3 T 乳腺 MRI(包括 DW-MRI,b 值为 0、800 和 1200 s/mm2;平面内分辨率为 1.1 × 1.1 mm2 或 1.3 × 1.3 mm2;切片厚度为 3 mm)检查的 33 名筛查出早期乳腺癌(60 例纯 DCIS、36 例有微小浸润的 DCIS 和 207 例小于 20 mm 的浸润癌)的女性进行回顾性研究。每项检查均由三名放射科医生独立审查。统计分析包括卡方检验(Chi-square test)、癌症检出率比较的 McNemar 检验和阅片员之间一致性的 Fleiss' Kappa 检验。混合效应逻辑回归分析用于评估与 DW-MRI 癌症检测相关的因素:结果:乳腺X光检查的癌症总检出率为54.8%,乳腺US检查为71.0%,DW-MRI为81.5%,DCE-MRI为87.1%。经 McNemar 检验,DW-MRI 检测出的癌症数量高于乳腺 X 线照相术(调整后的 p 结论:DW-MRI 检测出的癌症数量高于乳腺 X 线照相术):在检测临床隐匿性EBC(包括DCIS)方面,高分辨率DW-MRI加乳腺X光检查的癌症检出率与DCE-MRI加乳腺X光检查相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers: a multi-reader study.

Purpose: To compare mammography, breast ultrasound (US), high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI (DCE-MRI), and their combinations for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers (EBCs), including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Methods: Three hundred and three consecutive women with screening imaging-detected early breast cancers (60 pure DCIS, 36 DCIS with microinvasion, and 207 invasive carcinoma less than 20 mm) who underwent breast MRI at 3 T including DW-MRI (b-values of 0, 800 and 1200 s/mm2; in-plane resolution, 1.1 × 1.1 mm2 or 1.3 × 1.3 mm2; section thickness, 3 mm) were retrospectively reviewed. Three radiologists independently reviewed each examination. Statistical analysis included Chi-square test, McNemar test for comparison of cancer detection rates, and Fleiss' Kappa for interreader agreement. Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate factors associated with cancer detection on DW-MRI.

Results: The overall cancer detection rates were 54.8% on mammography, 71.0% on breast US, 81.5% on DW-MRI, and 87.1% on DCE-MRI. On McNemar test, DW-MRI detected more cancers than mammography (adjusted p < 0.001), and its combination with mammography showed a similar cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI combined with mammography (adjusted p = 0.808). On multivariable analysis, histologic type, lesion size, ADC and CNR on DW-MRI were independent factors for cancer detection on DW-MRI. The interreader agreement for cancer detection was moderate to substantial (Fleiss' kappa: 0.52-0.65) across each modality.

Conclusion: High-resolution DW-MRI plus mammography showed comparable cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult EBCs including DCIS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
期刊最新文献
Correction: FBLN2 is associated with basal cell markers Krt14 and ITGB1 in mouse mammary epithelial cells and has a preferential expression in molecular subtypes of human breast cancer. A randomised trial comparing 6-monthly adjuvant zoledronate with a single one-time dose in patients with early breast cancer. Alterations in the expression of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes in breast cancer tissues considering germline BRCA1/2 mutation status. Efficacy of antiobesity medications among breast cancer survivors taking aromatase inhibitors. Cost containment analysis of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) injection in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1