Chae Woon Lee, Hee Jung Shin, Hee Jeong Kim, Seunghee Baek, Seo Young Park, Woo Jung Choi, Eun Young Chae, Joo Hee Cha, Hak Hee Kim, Woo Kyung Moon
{"title":"高分辨率弥散加权磁共振成像检测临床隐匿性早期乳腺癌的性能:一项多读取器研究。","authors":"Chae Woon Lee, Hee Jung Shin, Hee Jeong Kim, Seunghee Baek, Seo Young Park, Woo Jung Choi, Eun Young Chae, Joo Hee Cha, Hak Hee Kim, Woo Kyung Moon","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07537-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare mammography, breast ultrasound (US), high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI (DCE-MRI), and their combinations for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers (EBCs), including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred and three consecutive women with screening imaging-detected early breast cancers (60 pure DCIS, 36 DCIS with microinvasion, and 207 invasive carcinoma less than 20 mm) who underwent breast MRI at 3 T including DW-MRI (b-values of 0, 800 and 1200 s/mm<sup>2</sup>; in-plane resolution, 1.1 × 1.1 mm<sup>2</sup> or 1.3 × 1.3 mm<sup>2</sup>; section thickness, 3 mm) were retrospectively reviewed. Three radiologists independently reviewed each examination. Statistical analysis included Chi-square test, McNemar test for comparison of cancer detection rates, and Fleiss' Kappa for interreader agreement. Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate factors associated with cancer detection on DW-MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall cancer detection rates were 54.8% on mammography, 71.0% on breast US, 81.5% on DW-MRI, and 87.1% on DCE-MRI. On McNemar test, DW-MRI detected more cancers than mammography (adjusted p < 0.001), and its combination with mammography showed a similar cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI combined with mammography (adjusted p = 0.808). On multivariable analysis, histologic type, lesion size, ADC and CNR on DW-MRI were independent factors for cancer detection on DW-MRI. The interreader agreement for cancer detection was moderate to substantial (Fleiss' kappa: 0.52-0.65) across each modality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-resolution DW-MRI plus mammography showed comparable cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult EBCs including DCIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers: a multi-reader study.\",\"authors\":\"Chae Woon Lee, Hee Jung Shin, Hee Jeong Kim, Seunghee Baek, Seo Young Park, Woo Jung Choi, Eun Young Chae, Joo Hee Cha, Hak Hee Kim, Woo Kyung Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-024-07537-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare mammography, breast ultrasound (US), high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI (DCE-MRI), and their combinations for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers (EBCs), including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred and three consecutive women with screening imaging-detected early breast cancers (60 pure DCIS, 36 DCIS with microinvasion, and 207 invasive carcinoma less than 20 mm) who underwent breast MRI at 3 T including DW-MRI (b-values of 0, 800 and 1200 s/mm<sup>2</sup>; in-plane resolution, 1.1 × 1.1 mm<sup>2</sup> or 1.3 × 1.3 mm<sup>2</sup>; section thickness, 3 mm) were retrospectively reviewed. Three radiologists independently reviewed each examination. Statistical analysis included Chi-square test, McNemar test for comparison of cancer detection rates, and Fleiss' Kappa for interreader agreement. Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate factors associated with cancer detection on DW-MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall cancer detection rates were 54.8% on mammography, 71.0% on breast US, 81.5% on DW-MRI, and 87.1% on DCE-MRI. On McNemar test, DW-MRI detected more cancers than mammography (adjusted p < 0.001), and its combination with mammography showed a similar cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI combined with mammography (adjusted p = 0.808). On multivariable analysis, histologic type, lesion size, ADC and CNR on DW-MRI were independent factors for cancer detection on DW-MRI. The interreader agreement for cancer detection was moderate to substantial (Fleiss' kappa: 0.52-0.65) across each modality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-resolution DW-MRI plus mammography showed comparable cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult EBCs including DCIS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07537-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07537-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance of high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers: a multi-reader study.
Purpose: To compare mammography, breast ultrasound (US), high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI (DCE-MRI), and their combinations for detecting clinically occult early breast cancers (EBCs), including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Methods: Three hundred and three consecutive women with screening imaging-detected early breast cancers (60 pure DCIS, 36 DCIS with microinvasion, and 207 invasive carcinoma less than 20 mm) who underwent breast MRI at 3 T including DW-MRI (b-values of 0, 800 and 1200 s/mm2; in-plane resolution, 1.1 × 1.1 mm2 or 1.3 × 1.3 mm2; section thickness, 3 mm) were retrospectively reviewed. Three radiologists independently reviewed each examination. Statistical analysis included Chi-square test, McNemar test for comparison of cancer detection rates, and Fleiss' Kappa for interreader agreement. Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate factors associated with cancer detection on DW-MRI.
Results: The overall cancer detection rates were 54.8% on mammography, 71.0% on breast US, 81.5% on DW-MRI, and 87.1% on DCE-MRI. On McNemar test, DW-MRI detected more cancers than mammography (adjusted p < 0.001), and its combination with mammography showed a similar cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI combined with mammography (adjusted p = 0.808). On multivariable analysis, histologic type, lesion size, ADC and CNR on DW-MRI were independent factors for cancer detection on DW-MRI. The interreader agreement for cancer detection was moderate to substantial (Fleiss' kappa: 0.52-0.65) across each modality.
Conclusion: High-resolution DW-MRI plus mammography showed comparable cancer detection rate to DCE-MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult EBCs including DCIS.
期刊介绍:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.