Reginna Vyctória Da Trindade Souza De Melo Carneiro, Mara Eliane Soares Ribeiro, Marina Lima Wanderley, Naama Waléria Alves Sousa, Paula Mendes Acatauassú Carneiro, Renan Campos Chisté, Sandro Cordeiro Loretto
{"title":"亚马逊图库皮对牙釉质和牙本质微剪切粘接强度的侵蚀影响","authors":"Reginna Vyctória Da Trindade Souza De Melo Carneiro, Mara Eliane Soares Ribeiro, Marina Lima Wanderley, Naama Waléria Alves Sousa, Paula Mendes Acatauassú Carneiro, Renan Campos Chisté, Sandro Cordeiro Loretto","doi":"10.4103/ccd.ccd_381_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The scientific literature has studies that assess the influence of erosive challenges with citric acidic drinks and substances on the adhesive bond strength to enamel and dentin, but does not contain information about the influence of regional components of an acidic diet on this process. Thus, this study evaluated the erosive influence of Amazonian tucupi on enamel and dentin microshear bond strength.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and sixty-eight healthy bovine incisors teeth were used, divided into 12 groups (<i>n</i> = 14). For erosive cycling, distilled water (negative control), cola-based soft drink (positive control), or tucupi were used, followed by adhesive strategies of (1) etch-and-rinse (conventional) (Adper™ Single Bond 2) and (2) self-etching (Clearfil SE Bond). All specimens were subjected to erosive cycling for 5 days and, after 24 h, composite resin cylinders were built up for the microshear bond strength test. The data showed normal distribution and were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey post and test (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in enamel (<i>P</i> > 0.05). In dentin, only the groups exposed to cola-based soft drink showed significant differences (<i>P</i> < 0.01). The failure mode showed that Type II (mixed) was predominant (95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The erosive challenge with tucupi did not influence the bond strength to enamel and dentin, regardless of the adhesive strategy used.</p>","PeriodicalId":10632,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","volume":"15 3","pages":"186-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erosive Influence of Amazonian Tucupi on Microshear Bond Strength to Enamel and Dentin.\",\"authors\":\"Reginna Vyctória Da Trindade Souza De Melo Carneiro, Mara Eliane Soares Ribeiro, Marina Lima Wanderley, Naama Waléria Alves Sousa, Paula Mendes Acatauassú Carneiro, Renan Campos Chisté, Sandro Cordeiro Loretto\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ccd.ccd_381_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The scientific literature has studies that assess the influence of erosive challenges with citric acidic drinks and substances on the adhesive bond strength to enamel and dentin, but does not contain information about the influence of regional components of an acidic diet on this process. Thus, this study evaluated the erosive influence of Amazonian tucupi on enamel and dentin microshear bond strength.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and sixty-eight healthy bovine incisors teeth were used, divided into 12 groups (<i>n</i> = 14). For erosive cycling, distilled water (negative control), cola-based soft drink (positive control), or tucupi were used, followed by adhesive strategies of (1) etch-and-rinse (conventional) (Adper™ Single Bond 2) and (2) self-etching (Clearfil SE Bond). All specimens were subjected to erosive cycling for 5 days and, after 24 h, composite resin cylinders were built up for the microshear bond strength test. The data showed normal distribution and were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey post and test (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in enamel (<i>P</i> > 0.05). In dentin, only the groups exposed to cola-based soft drink showed significant differences (<i>P</i> < 0.01). The failure mode showed that Type II (mixed) was predominant (95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The erosive challenge with tucupi did not influence the bond strength to enamel and dentin, regardless of the adhesive strategy used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"186-191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540205/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_381_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_381_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:科学文献中有一些研究评估了柠檬酸饮料和物质的侵蚀性挑战对牙釉质和牙本质粘接强度的影响,但没有关于酸性饮食中的地区成分对这一过程的影响的信息。因此,本研究评估了亚马逊土茯苓对牙釉质和牙本质微剪切粘接强度的侵蚀影响:使用 168 颗健康牛门牙,分为 12 组(n = 14)。在侵蚀循环中,使用蒸馏水(阴性对照)、可乐型软饮料(阳性对照)或 tucupi,然后使用(1)蚀刻-冲洗(传统)(Adper™ Single Bond 2)和(2)自酸洗(Clearfil SE Bond)粘接策略。所有试样均经过 5 天的侵蚀循环,24 小时后,制作复合树脂圆柱体,进行微剪切粘接强度测试。数据呈正态分布,采用双因素方差分析,然后进行 Tukey 后检验(P ≤ 0.05):结果:在釉质中没有明显差异(P > 0.05)。在牙本质中,只有接触可乐型软饮料的组别存在显著差异(P < 0.01)。失效模式显示,II 型(混合型)占主导地位(95%):结论:无论使用哪种粘接策略,tucupi 的侵蚀性挑战都不会影响与牙釉质和牙本质的粘接强度。
Erosive Influence of Amazonian Tucupi on Microshear Bond Strength to Enamel and Dentin.
Background: The scientific literature has studies that assess the influence of erosive challenges with citric acidic drinks and substances on the adhesive bond strength to enamel and dentin, but does not contain information about the influence of regional components of an acidic diet on this process. Thus, this study evaluated the erosive influence of Amazonian tucupi on enamel and dentin microshear bond strength.
Materials and methods: One hundred and sixty-eight healthy bovine incisors teeth were used, divided into 12 groups (n = 14). For erosive cycling, distilled water (negative control), cola-based soft drink (positive control), or tucupi were used, followed by adhesive strategies of (1) etch-and-rinse (conventional) (Adper™ Single Bond 2) and (2) self-etching (Clearfil SE Bond). All specimens were subjected to erosive cycling for 5 days and, after 24 h, composite resin cylinders were built up for the microshear bond strength test. The data showed normal distribution and were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey post and test (P ≤ 0.05).
Results: There were no significant differences in enamel (P > 0.05). In dentin, only the groups exposed to cola-based soft drink showed significant differences (P < 0.01). The failure mode showed that Type II (mixed) was predominant (95%).
Conclusion: The erosive challenge with tucupi did not influence the bond strength to enamel and dentin, regardless of the adhesive strategy used.
期刊介绍:
The journal Contemporary Clinical Dentistry (CCD) (Print ISSN: 0976-237X, E-ISSN:0976- 2361) is peer-reviewed journal published on behalf of Maharishi Markandeshwar University and issues are published quarterly in the last week of March, June, September and December. The Journal publishes Original research papers, clinical studies, case series strictly of clinical interest. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of Dentistry i.e. Conservative dentistry and Endodontics, Dentofacial orthopedics and Orthodontics, Oral medicine and Radiology, Oral pathology, Oral surgery, Orodental diseases, Pediatric Dentistry, Periodontics, Clinical aspects of Public Health dentistry and Prosthodontics. Review articles are not accepted. Review, if published, will only be by invitation from eminent scholars and academicians of National and International repute in the field of Medical/Dental education.