利用常规健康数据将家庭成员联系起来并定义关系网络。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Current opinion in pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1097/MOP.0000000000001415
Jeffrey I Campbell, Ana Poblacion, Richard Sheward
{"title":"利用常规健康数据将家庭成员联系起来并定义关系网络。","authors":"Jeffrey I Campbell, Ana Poblacion, Richard Sheward","doi":"10.1097/MOP.0000000000001415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The growth of rich electronic health record (EHR) data and large health databases has introduced new opportunities to link individuals together into households and relational networks. These 'linked relational networks' hold promise for providing family-level care and studying intergenerational epidemiology and clinical outcomes. However, as linked relational networks become more commonly available in EHRs and research databases, it is critical to understand their challenges and limitations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Matching algorithms are being used to create linked relational networks in EHR and health databases. Clinically, these algorithms have been most useful to provide dyadic maternal-newborn care. In research, studies using these algorithms investigate topics ranging from the pharmacoepidemiology of parental drug exposure on childhood health outcomes, to heritability of chronic conditions, to associations between parental and child healthcare access and service delivery. However, ethical and technical challenges continue to limit use of these algorithms. There is also a critical research gap in the external validity of these matching algorithms.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Linked relational networks are in widespread use in pediatric clinical care and research. More research is needed to understand the scope, limitations, and biases inherent in existing matching strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10985,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking household members and defining relational networks using routine health data.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey I Campbell, Ana Poblacion, Richard Sheward\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOP.0000000000001415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The growth of rich electronic health record (EHR) data and large health databases has introduced new opportunities to link individuals together into households and relational networks. These 'linked relational networks' hold promise for providing family-level care and studying intergenerational epidemiology and clinical outcomes. However, as linked relational networks become more commonly available in EHRs and research databases, it is critical to understand their challenges and limitations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Matching algorithms are being used to create linked relational networks in EHR and health databases. Clinically, these algorithms have been most useful to provide dyadic maternal-newborn care. In research, studies using these algorithms investigate topics ranging from the pharmacoepidemiology of parental drug exposure on childhood health outcomes, to heritability of chronic conditions, to associations between parental and child healthcare access and service delivery. However, ethical and technical challenges continue to limit use of these algorithms. There is also a critical research gap in the external validity of these matching algorithms.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Linked relational networks are in widespread use in pediatric clinical care and research. More research is needed to understand the scope, limitations, and biases inherent in existing matching strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000001415\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000001415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查目的:丰富的电子健康记录(EHR)数据和大型健康数据库的增长为将个人连接成家庭和关系网络带来了新的机遇。这些 "关联关系网络 "为提供家庭层面的护理以及研究代际流行病学和临床结果带来了希望。然而,随着关联关系网络在电子病历和研究数据库中的普及,了解其挑战和局限性至关重要:最近的研究结果:匹配算法正被用于在电子病历和健康数据库中创建关联关系网络。在临床上,这些算法对提供母婴护理最有用。在研究方面,使用这些算法的研究课题包括父母药物暴露对儿童健康结果的药物流行病学、慢性病的遗传性、父母与儿童医疗保健获取和服务提供之间的关联等。然而,伦理和技术方面的挑战仍然限制着这些算法的使用。摘要:关联关系网络在儿科临床护理和研究中得到了广泛应用。需要开展更多研究,以了解现有匹配策略的范围、局限性和固有偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Linking household members and defining relational networks using routine health data.

Purpose of review: The growth of rich electronic health record (EHR) data and large health databases has introduced new opportunities to link individuals together into households and relational networks. These 'linked relational networks' hold promise for providing family-level care and studying intergenerational epidemiology and clinical outcomes. However, as linked relational networks become more commonly available in EHRs and research databases, it is critical to understand their challenges and limitations.

Recent findings: Matching algorithms are being used to create linked relational networks in EHR and health databases. Clinically, these algorithms have been most useful to provide dyadic maternal-newborn care. In research, studies using these algorithms investigate topics ranging from the pharmacoepidemiology of parental drug exposure on childhood health outcomes, to heritability of chronic conditions, to associations between parental and child healthcare access and service delivery. However, ethical and technical challenges continue to limit use of these algorithms. There is also a critical research gap in the external validity of these matching algorithms.

Summary: Linked relational networks are in widespread use in pediatric clinical care and research. More research is needed to understand the scope, limitations, and biases inherent in existing matching strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
184
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Current Opinion in Pediatrics is a reader-friendly resource which allows the reader to keep up-to-date with the most important advances in the pediatric field. Each issue of Current Opinion in Pediatrics contains three main sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive cover of all key issues related to pediatrics; including genetics, therapeutics and toxicology, adolescent medicine, neonatology and perinatology, and orthopedics. Unique to Current Opinion in Pediatrics is the office pediatrics section which appears in every issue and covers popular topics such as fever, immunization and ADHD. Current Opinion in Pediatrics is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
期刊最新文献
Neuromonitoring in the ICU: noninvasive and invasive modalities for critically ill children and neonates. Riding the gene therapy wave: challenges and opportunities for rare disease patients and clinicians. Single center experience developing sustainable genetics clinical care: a model to address workforce challenges in medical genetics. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders and the role for the epithelium in pathogenesis and treatment. Hematopoietic cell transplantation for inborn errors of immunity: an update on approaches, outcomes and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1