Yan Zheng, Yingbi Wu, Lin Yu, Yelin Jia, Tingting Yang, Qingyuan Cheng, Jiao Qin, Xiao Liu, Min Jiang, Fuping Li
{"title":"精液分析的外部质量评估/能力测试在过去 34 年中是如何发展的:综述。","authors":"Yan Zheng, Yingbi Wu, Lin Yu, Yelin Jia, Tingting Yang, Qingyuan Cheng, Jiao Qin, Xiao Liu, Min Jiang, Fuping Li","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2024-1062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Male infertility has become an important issue of global concern. Semen analysis is the cornerstone of male fertility assessment. External quality assessment (EQA) of sperm concentration, motility, and morphology is widely recognized in the world. However, over the past 34 years, the implementation of EQA for semen analysis has varied across different countries, and there is no global consensus. The goal of this paper is to first explore the overall development of EQA during this period. Secondly, it aims to discuss the extent of difference of participating laboratories in different countries. Finally, the paper examines the differences in EQA programs developed by various EQA providers in order to seek a global standard. In total, 29 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. There is inconsistent in the implementation of EQA across different countries, and there is no global consensus. Policies for EQA of semen analysis vary from country to country. Some countries mandate laboratory participation, while others permit voluntary involvement. Different EQA organizers choose different ways to calculate assigned value and acceptance limits. The coefficient of variation (CV) for each EQA item was large. The CVs of concentration, motility, morphology, and viability were 12.7-138.0 %, 17.0-127.0 %, 7-375 %, and 6-41.1 %, respectively. The results of the semen analysis varied considerably among the participating laboratories. The collaborative efforts of national policymakers, EQA organizers, and all participating laboratories are essential to improving the current situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How has the external quality assessment/proficiency testing of semen analysis been developed in the past 34 years: a review.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Zheng, Yingbi Wu, Lin Yu, Yelin Jia, Tingting Yang, Qingyuan Cheng, Jiao Qin, Xiao Liu, Min Jiang, Fuping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2024-1062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Male infertility has become an important issue of global concern. Semen analysis is the cornerstone of male fertility assessment. External quality assessment (EQA) of sperm concentration, motility, and morphology is widely recognized in the world. However, over the past 34 years, the implementation of EQA for semen analysis has varied across different countries, and there is no global consensus. The goal of this paper is to first explore the overall development of EQA during this period. Secondly, it aims to discuss the extent of difference of participating laboratories in different countries. Finally, the paper examines the differences in EQA programs developed by various EQA providers in order to seek a global standard. In total, 29 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. There is inconsistent in the implementation of EQA across different countries, and there is no global consensus. Policies for EQA of semen analysis vary from country to country. Some countries mandate laboratory participation, while others permit voluntary involvement. Different EQA organizers choose different ways to calculate assigned value and acceptance limits. The coefficient of variation (CV) for each EQA item was large. The CVs of concentration, motility, morphology, and viability were 12.7-138.0 %, 17.0-127.0 %, 7-375 %, and 6-41.1 %, respectively. The results of the semen analysis varied considerably among the participating laboratories. The collaborative efforts of national policymakers, EQA organizers, and all participating laboratories are essential to improving the current situation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1062\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
How has the external quality assessment/proficiency testing of semen analysis been developed in the past 34 years: a review.
Male infertility has become an important issue of global concern. Semen analysis is the cornerstone of male fertility assessment. External quality assessment (EQA) of sperm concentration, motility, and morphology is widely recognized in the world. However, over the past 34 years, the implementation of EQA for semen analysis has varied across different countries, and there is no global consensus. The goal of this paper is to first explore the overall development of EQA during this period. Secondly, it aims to discuss the extent of difference of participating laboratories in different countries. Finally, the paper examines the differences in EQA programs developed by various EQA providers in order to seek a global standard. In total, 29 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. There is inconsistent in the implementation of EQA across different countries, and there is no global consensus. Policies for EQA of semen analysis vary from country to country. Some countries mandate laboratory participation, while others permit voluntary involvement. Different EQA organizers choose different ways to calculate assigned value and acceptance limits. The coefficient of variation (CV) for each EQA item was large. The CVs of concentration, motility, morphology, and viability were 12.7-138.0 %, 17.0-127.0 %, 7-375 %, and 6-41.1 %, respectively. The results of the semen analysis varied considerably among the participating laboratories. The collaborative efforts of national policymakers, EQA organizers, and all participating laboratories are essential to improving the current situation.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically.
CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France).
Topics:
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical genomics and molecular biology
- clinical haematology and coagulation
- clinical immunology and autoimmunity
- clinical microbiology
- drug monitoring and analysis
- evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers
- disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes)
- new reagents, instrumentation and technologies
- new methodologies
- reference materials and methods
- reference values and decision limits
- quality and safety in laboratory medicine
- translational laboratory medicine
- clinical metrology
Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!