精液分析的外部质量评估/能力测试在过去 34 年中是如何发展的:综述。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1515/cclm-2024-1062
Yan Zheng, Yingbi Wu, Lin Yu, Yelin Jia, Tingting Yang, Qingyuan Cheng, Jiao Qin, Xiao Liu, Min Jiang, Fuping Li
{"title":"精液分析的外部质量评估/能力测试在过去 34 年中是如何发展的:综述。","authors":"Yan Zheng, Yingbi Wu, Lin Yu, Yelin Jia, Tingting Yang, Qingyuan Cheng, Jiao Qin, Xiao Liu, Min Jiang, Fuping Li","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2024-1062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Male infertility has become an important issue of global concern. Semen analysis is the cornerstone of male fertility assessment. External quality assessment (EQA) of sperm concentration, motility, and morphology is widely recognized in the world. However, over the past 34 years, the implementation of EQA for semen analysis has varied across different countries, and there is no global consensus. The goal of this paper is to first explore the overall development of EQA during this period. Secondly, it aims to discuss the extent of difference of participating laboratories in different countries. Finally, the paper examines the differences in EQA programs developed by various EQA providers in order to seek a global standard. In total, 29 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. There is inconsistent in the implementation of EQA across different countries, and there is no global consensus. Policies for EQA of semen analysis vary from country to country. Some countries mandate laboratory participation, while others permit voluntary involvement. Different EQA organizers choose different ways to calculate assigned value and acceptance limits. The coefficient of variation (CV) for each EQA item was large. The CVs of concentration, motility, morphology, and viability were 12.7-138.0 %, 17.0-127.0 %, 7-375 %, and 6-41.1 %, respectively. The results of the semen analysis varied considerably among the participating laboratories. The collaborative efforts of national policymakers, EQA organizers, and all participating laboratories are essential to improving the current situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How has the external quality assessment/proficiency testing of semen analysis been developed in the past 34 years: a review.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Zheng, Yingbi Wu, Lin Yu, Yelin Jia, Tingting Yang, Qingyuan Cheng, Jiao Qin, Xiao Liu, Min Jiang, Fuping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2024-1062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Male infertility has become an important issue of global concern. Semen analysis is the cornerstone of male fertility assessment. External quality assessment (EQA) of sperm concentration, motility, and morphology is widely recognized in the world. However, over the past 34 years, the implementation of EQA for semen analysis has varied across different countries, and there is no global consensus. The goal of this paper is to first explore the overall development of EQA during this period. Secondly, it aims to discuss the extent of difference of participating laboratories in different countries. Finally, the paper examines the differences in EQA programs developed by various EQA providers in order to seek a global standard. In total, 29 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. There is inconsistent in the implementation of EQA across different countries, and there is no global consensus. Policies for EQA of semen analysis vary from country to country. Some countries mandate laboratory participation, while others permit voluntary involvement. Different EQA organizers choose different ways to calculate assigned value and acceptance limits. The coefficient of variation (CV) for each EQA item was large. The CVs of concentration, motility, morphology, and viability were 12.7-138.0 %, 17.0-127.0 %, 7-375 %, and 6-41.1 %, respectively. The results of the semen analysis varied considerably among the participating laboratories. The collaborative efforts of national policymakers, EQA organizers, and all participating laboratories are essential to improving the current situation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1062\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

男性不育已成为全球关注的重要问题。精液分析是男性生育能力评估的基石。精子浓度、活力和形态的外部质量评估(EQA)已得到世界广泛认可。然而,在过去的 34 年中,精液分析的 EQA 在不同国家的实施情况各不相同,也没有达成全球共识。本文旨在首先探讨 EQA 在此期间的整体发展情况。其次,本文旨在讨论不同国家参与实验室的差异程度。最后,本文探讨了不同 EQA 提供商为寻求全球标准而制定的 EQA 计划的差异。共有 29 篇论文符合纳入标准并被纳入本综述。不同国家的 EQA 实施情况不尽相同,也未达成全球共识。精液分析的 EQA 政策因国家而异。一些国家规定实验室必须参与,而另一些国家则允许自愿参与。不同的 EQA 组织者选择不同的方法来计算分配值和接受限。每个 EQA 项目的变异系数(CV)都很大。浓度、活力、形态和存活率的变异系数分别为 12.7-138.0%、17.0-127.0%、7-375% 和 6-41.1%。各参与实验室的精液分析结果差异很大。要改善目前的状况,国家政策制定者、EQA 组织者和所有参与实验室的共同努力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How has the external quality assessment/proficiency testing of semen analysis been developed in the past 34 years: a review.

Male infertility has become an important issue of global concern. Semen analysis is the cornerstone of male fertility assessment. External quality assessment (EQA) of sperm concentration, motility, and morphology is widely recognized in the world. However, over the past 34 years, the implementation of EQA for semen analysis has varied across different countries, and there is no global consensus. The goal of this paper is to first explore the overall development of EQA during this period. Secondly, it aims to discuss the extent of difference of participating laboratories in different countries. Finally, the paper examines the differences in EQA programs developed by various EQA providers in order to seek a global standard. In total, 29 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. There is inconsistent in the implementation of EQA across different countries, and there is no global consensus. Policies for EQA of semen analysis vary from country to country. Some countries mandate laboratory participation, while others permit voluntary involvement. Different EQA organizers choose different ways to calculate assigned value and acceptance limits. The coefficient of variation (CV) for each EQA item was large. The CVs of concentration, motility, morphology, and viability were 12.7-138.0 %, 17.0-127.0 %, 7-375 %, and 6-41.1 %, respectively. The results of the semen analysis varied considerably among the participating laboratories. The collaborative efforts of national policymakers, EQA organizers, and all participating laboratories are essential to improving the current situation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
期刊最新文献
CD34+ progenitor cells meet metrology. Expanded carrier screening for 224 monogenic disease genes in 1,499 Chinese couples: a single-center study. Allowable total error in CD34 cell analysis by flow cytometry based on state of the art using Spanish EQAS data. Comparison of capillary finger stick and venous blood sampling for 34 routine chemistry analytes: potential for in the hospital and remote blood sampling. Diagnostic performances and cut-off verification of blood pTau 217 on the Lumipulse platform for amyloid deposition in Alzheimer's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1