Ruwan Thilakaratne, Rosemary Castorina, Gina Solomon, Mary M Mosburg, Benjamin C Moeller, Josephine F Trott, Tara D Falt, Ariadne Villegas-Gomez, Kevin W Dodd, Catherine Thomsen, Paul English, Xiang Yang, Annika Khan, Asa Bradman, Russell C Hovey
{"title":"美国人从牛肉中摄入内源性和外源性激素的估计值。","authors":"Ruwan Thilakaratne, Rosemary Castorina, Gina Solomon, Mary M Mosburg, Benjamin C Moeller, Josephine F Trott, Tara D Falt, Ariadne Villegas-Gomez, Kevin W Dodd, Catherine Thomsen, Paul English, Xiang Yang, Annika Khan, Asa Bradman, Russell C Hovey","doi":"10.1038/s41370-024-00727-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endogenous and exogenous hormones may be present in beef. Human consumption of hormones has been linked to adverse health effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate daily intake of hormonal growth promotants (HGP) from beef consumed by the US population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We combined self-reported beef consumption information from a nationally-representative survey with concentrations of 12 HGP measured in 397 samples of retail beef/fat purchased in California. We defined typical, high, and maximum intake scenarios assuming self-reported consumed beef contained the mean, 95<sup>th</sup> percentile, and maximum concentrations of each HGP, respectively. We estimated distributions of usual (i.e., long-term) daily intake and short-term daily intake (µg/kg/day). We calculated the hazard quotient (HQ), or ratio of estimated intake to the World Health Organization's acceptable daily intake (ADI) for the HGP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest estimated HQs were found for melengestrol acetate (MGA). For usual daily intake under the typical intake scenario, no HQ exceeded 0.02 (0.00047 µg MGA/kg/day). Under the maximum intake scenario, the highest HQ was 0.29 (0.0087 µg MGA/kg/day), corresponding to the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile of intake among young boys (ages 1-5). The highest short-term intake estimates for MGA under the maximum intake scenario were the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile of intake among young girls and boys, which equaled (HQ = 1.00) or exceeded (HQ = 1.29) the ADI for MGA, respectively.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Hormonal growth promotants (HGP) are used to increase beef production and have been linked to adverse reproductive effects. We estimated daily intake of MGA and several other HGP using US nationally-representative beef consumption data collected between 2015-2018 and HGP concentrations in retail beef. Estimated intake was highest for young children, but estimates were generally very low compared to current health-based intake limits. However, these limits are typically based on studies in adult animals, and further study of potential adverse effects during sensitive developmental periods, such as in early life, may be warranted to ensure recommended intake limits are health-protective.</p>","PeriodicalId":15684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimated human intake of endogenous and exogenous hormones from beef in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Ruwan Thilakaratne, Rosemary Castorina, Gina Solomon, Mary M Mosburg, Benjamin C Moeller, Josephine F Trott, Tara D Falt, Ariadne Villegas-Gomez, Kevin W Dodd, Catherine Thomsen, Paul English, Xiang Yang, Annika Khan, Asa Bradman, Russell C Hovey\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41370-024-00727-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endogenous and exogenous hormones may be present in beef. Human consumption of hormones has been linked to adverse health effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate daily intake of hormonal growth promotants (HGP) from beef consumed by the US population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We combined self-reported beef consumption information from a nationally-representative survey with concentrations of 12 HGP measured in 397 samples of retail beef/fat purchased in California. We defined typical, high, and maximum intake scenarios assuming self-reported consumed beef contained the mean, 95<sup>th</sup> percentile, and maximum concentrations of each HGP, respectively. We estimated distributions of usual (i.e., long-term) daily intake and short-term daily intake (µg/kg/day). We calculated the hazard quotient (HQ), or ratio of estimated intake to the World Health Organization's acceptable daily intake (ADI) for the HGP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest estimated HQs were found for melengestrol acetate (MGA). For usual daily intake under the typical intake scenario, no HQ exceeded 0.02 (0.00047 µg MGA/kg/day). Under the maximum intake scenario, the highest HQ was 0.29 (0.0087 µg MGA/kg/day), corresponding to the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile of intake among young boys (ages 1-5). The highest short-term intake estimates for MGA under the maximum intake scenario were the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile of intake among young girls and boys, which equaled (HQ = 1.00) or exceeded (HQ = 1.29) the ADI for MGA, respectively.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Hormonal growth promotants (HGP) are used to increase beef production and have been linked to adverse reproductive effects. We estimated daily intake of MGA and several other HGP using US nationally-representative beef consumption data collected between 2015-2018 and HGP concentrations in retail beef. Estimated intake was highest for young children, but estimates were generally very low compared to current health-based intake limits. However, these limits are typically based on studies in adult animals, and further study of potential adverse effects during sensitive developmental periods, such as in early life, may be warranted to ensure recommended intake limits are health-protective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-024-00727-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-024-00727-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimated human intake of endogenous and exogenous hormones from beef in the United States.
Background: Endogenous and exogenous hormones may be present in beef. Human consumption of hormones has been linked to adverse health effects.
Objective: To estimate daily intake of hormonal growth promotants (HGP) from beef consumed by the US population.
Methods: We combined self-reported beef consumption information from a nationally-representative survey with concentrations of 12 HGP measured in 397 samples of retail beef/fat purchased in California. We defined typical, high, and maximum intake scenarios assuming self-reported consumed beef contained the mean, 95th percentile, and maximum concentrations of each HGP, respectively. We estimated distributions of usual (i.e., long-term) daily intake and short-term daily intake (µg/kg/day). We calculated the hazard quotient (HQ), or ratio of estimated intake to the World Health Organization's acceptable daily intake (ADI) for the HGP.
Results: The highest estimated HQs were found for melengestrol acetate (MGA). For usual daily intake under the typical intake scenario, no HQ exceeded 0.02 (0.00047 µg MGA/kg/day). Under the maximum intake scenario, the highest HQ was 0.29 (0.0087 µg MGA/kg/day), corresponding to the 99th percentile of intake among young boys (ages 1-5). The highest short-term intake estimates for MGA under the maximum intake scenario were the 99th percentile of intake among young girls and boys, which equaled (HQ = 1.00) or exceeded (HQ = 1.29) the ADI for MGA, respectively.
Impact: Hormonal growth promotants (HGP) are used to increase beef production and have been linked to adverse reproductive effects. We estimated daily intake of MGA and several other HGP using US nationally-representative beef consumption data collected between 2015-2018 and HGP concentrations in retail beef. Estimated intake was highest for young children, but estimates were generally very low compared to current health-based intake limits. However, these limits are typically based on studies in adult animals, and further study of potential adverse effects during sensitive developmental periods, such as in early life, may be warranted to ensure recommended intake limits are health-protective.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (JESEE) aims to be the premier and authoritative source of information on advances in exposure science for professionals in a wide range of environmental and public health disciplines.
JESEE publishes original peer-reviewed research presenting significant advances in exposure science and exposure analysis, including development and application of the latest technologies for measuring exposures, and innovative computational approaches for translating novel data streams to characterize and predict exposures. The types of papers published in the research section of JESEE are original research articles, translation studies, and correspondence. Reported results should further understanding of the relationship between environmental exposure and human health, describe evaluated novel exposure science tools, or demonstrate potential of exposure science to enable decisions and actions that promote and protect human health.