美国人从牛肉中摄入内源性和外源性激素的估计值。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1038/s41370-024-00727-1
Ruwan Thilakaratne, Rosemary Castorina, Gina Solomon, Mary M Mosburg, Benjamin C Moeller, Josephine F Trott, Tara D Falt, Ariadne Villegas-Gomez, Kevin W Dodd, Catherine Thomsen, Paul English, Xiang Yang, Annika Khan, Asa Bradman, Russell C Hovey
{"title":"美国人从牛肉中摄入内源性和外源性激素的估计值。","authors":"Ruwan Thilakaratne, Rosemary Castorina, Gina Solomon, Mary M Mosburg, Benjamin C Moeller, Josephine F Trott, Tara D Falt, Ariadne Villegas-Gomez, Kevin W Dodd, Catherine Thomsen, Paul English, Xiang Yang, Annika Khan, Asa Bradman, Russell C Hovey","doi":"10.1038/s41370-024-00727-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endogenous and exogenous hormones may be present in beef. Human consumption of hormones has been linked to adverse health effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate daily intake of hormonal growth promotants (HGP) from beef consumed by the US population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We combined self-reported beef consumption information from a nationally-representative survey with concentrations of 12 HGP measured in 397 samples of retail beef/fat purchased in California. We defined typical, high, and maximum intake scenarios assuming self-reported consumed beef contained the mean, 95<sup>th</sup> percentile, and maximum concentrations of each HGP, respectively. We estimated distributions of usual (i.e., long-term) daily intake and short-term daily intake (µg/kg/day). We calculated the hazard quotient (HQ), or ratio of estimated intake to the World Health Organization's acceptable daily intake (ADI) for the HGP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest estimated HQs were found for melengestrol acetate (MGA). For usual daily intake under the typical intake scenario, no HQ exceeded 0.02 (0.00047 µg MGA/kg/day). Under the maximum intake scenario, the highest HQ was 0.29 (0.0087 µg MGA/kg/day), corresponding to the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile of intake among young boys (ages 1-5). The highest short-term intake estimates for MGA under the maximum intake scenario were the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile of intake among young girls and boys, which equaled (HQ = 1.00) or exceeded (HQ = 1.29) the ADI for MGA, respectively.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Hormonal growth promotants (HGP) are used to increase beef production and have been linked to adverse reproductive effects. We estimated daily intake of MGA and several other HGP using US nationally-representative beef consumption data collected between 2015-2018 and HGP concentrations in retail beef. Estimated intake was highest for young children, but estimates were generally very low compared to current health-based intake limits. However, these limits are typically based on studies in adult animals, and further study of potential adverse effects during sensitive developmental periods, such as in early life, may be warranted to ensure recommended intake limits are health-protective.</p>","PeriodicalId":15684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimated human intake of endogenous and exogenous hormones from beef in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Ruwan Thilakaratne, Rosemary Castorina, Gina Solomon, Mary M Mosburg, Benjamin C Moeller, Josephine F Trott, Tara D Falt, Ariadne Villegas-Gomez, Kevin W Dodd, Catherine Thomsen, Paul English, Xiang Yang, Annika Khan, Asa Bradman, Russell C Hovey\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41370-024-00727-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endogenous and exogenous hormones may be present in beef. Human consumption of hormones has been linked to adverse health effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate daily intake of hormonal growth promotants (HGP) from beef consumed by the US population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We combined self-reported beef consumption information from a nationally-representative survey with concentrations of 12 HGP measured in 397 samples of retail beef/fat purchased in California. We defined typical, high, and maximum intake scenarios assuming self-reported consumed beef contained the mean, 95<sup>th</sup> percentile, and maximum concentrations of each HGP, respectively. We estimated distributions of usual (i.e., long-term) daily intake and short-term daily intake (µg/kg/day). We calculated the hazard quotient (HQ), or ratio of estimated intake to the World Health Organization's acceptable daily intake (ADI) for the HGP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest estimated HQs were found for melengestrol acetate (MGA). For usual daily intake under the typical intake scenario, no HQ exceeded 0.02 (0.00047 µg MGA/kg/day). Under the maximum intake scenario, the highest HQ was 0.29 (0.0087 µg MGA/kg/day), corresponding to the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile of intake among young boys (ages 1-5). The highest short-term intake estimates for MGA under the maximum intake scenario were the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile of intake among young girls and boys, which equaled (HQ = 1.00) or exceeded (HQ = 1.29) the ADI for MGA, respectively.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Hormonal growth promotants (HGP) are used to increase beef production and have been linked to adverse reproductive effects. We estimated daily intake of MGA and several other HGP using US nationally-representative beef consumption data collected between 2015-2018 and HGP concentrations in retail beef. Estimated intake was highest for young children, but estimates were generally very low compared to current health-based intake limits. However, these limits are typically based on studies in adult animals, and further study of potential adverse effects during sensitive developmental periods, such as in early life, may be warranted to ensure recommended intake limits are health-protective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-024-00727-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-024-00727-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:牛肉中可能含有内源性和外源性激素。人类食用激素与不良健康影响有关:估算美国人每天从牛肉中摄入的激素类生长促进剂 (HGP):我们将一项具有全国代表性的调查所提供的自我报告的牛肉消费信息与在加利福尼亚州购买的 397 份零售牛肉/脂肪样本中测得的 12 种 HGP 的浓度相结合。我们定义了典型、高和最高摄入量情景,假设自我报告的消费牛肉分别含有每种 HGP 的平均值、第 95 百分位数和最高浓度。我们估算了通常(即长期)每日摄入量和短期每日摄入量(微克/千克/天)的分布。我们计算了危险商数 (HQ),即估计摄入量与世界卫生组织规定的 HGP 每日允许摄入量 (ADI) 之比:醋酸美伦孕酮(MGA)的估计 HQ 最高。在典型摄入情况下,通常每日摄入量的 HQ 值均未超过 0.02(0.00047 微克 MGA/千克/天)。在最大摄入量情况下,最高 HQ 值为 0.29(0.0087 微克 MGA/千克/天),相当于小男孩(1-5 岁)摄入量的第 99 百分位数。影响:激素类生长促进剂(HGP)用于提高牛肉产量,并与不良生殖影响有关。我们利用 2015-2018 年间收集的美国全国牛肉消费数据和零售牛肉中的 HGP 浓度,估算了 MGA 和其他几种 HGP 的日摄入量。幼儿的估计摄入量最高,但与目前基于健康的摄入限量相比,估计摄入量普遍很低。不过,这些限值通常基于对成年动物的研究,因此可能需要进一步研究发育敏感期(如生命早期)的潜在不利影响,以确保建议的摄入限值能够保护健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimated human intake of endogenous and exogenous hormones from beef in the United States.

Background: Endogenous and exogenous hormones may be present in beef. Human consumption of hormones has been linked to adverse health effects.

Objective: To estimate daily intake of hormonal growth promotants (HGP) from beef consumed by the US population.

Methods: We combined self-reported beef consumption information from a nationally-representative survey with concentrations of 12 HGP measured in 397 samples of retail beef/fat purchased in California. We defined typical, high, and maximum intake scenarios assuming self-reported consumed beef contained the mean, 95th percentile, and maximum concentrations of each HGP, respectively. We estimated distributions of usual (i.e., long-term) daily intake and short-term daily intake (µg/kg/day). We calculated the hazard quotient (HQ), or ratio of estimated intake to the World Health Organization's acceptable daily intake (ADI) for the HGP.

Results: The highest estimated HQs were found for melengestrol acetate (MGA). For usual daily intake under the typical intake scenario, no HQ exceeded 0.02 (0.00047 µg MGA/kg/day). Under the maximum intake scenario, the highest HQ was 0.29 (0.0087 µg MGA/kg/day), corresponding to the 99th percentile of intake among young boys (ages 1-5). The highest short-term intake estimates for MGA under the maximum intake scenario were the 99th percentile of intake among young girls and boys, which equaled (HQ = 1.00) or exceeded (HQ = 1.29) the ADI for MGA, respectively.

Impact: Hormonal growth promotants (HGP) are used to increase beef production and have been linked to adverse reproductive effects. We estimated daily intake of MGA and several other HGP using US nationally-representative beef consumption data collected between 2015-2018 and HGP concentrations in retail beef. Estimated intake was highest for young children, but estimates were generally very low compared to current health-based intake limits. However, these limits are typically based on studies in adult animals, and further study of potential adverse effects during sensitive developmental periods, such as in early life, may be warranted to ensure recommended intake limits are health-protective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (JESEE) aims to be the premier and authoritative source of information on advances in exposure science for professionals in a wide range of environmental and public health disciplines. JESEE publishes original peer-reviewed research presenting significant advances in exposure science and exposure analysis, including development and application of the latest technologies for measuring exposures, and innovative computational approaches for translating novel data streams to characterize and predict exposures. The types of papers published in the research section of JESEE are original research articles, translation studies, and correspondence. Reported results should further understanding of the relationship between environmental exposure and human health, describe evaluated novel exposure science tools, or demonstrate potential of exposure science to enable decisions and actions that promote and protect human health.
期刊最新文献
Additive effect of high transportation noise exposure and socioeconomic deprivation on stress-associated neural activity, atherosclerotic inflammation, and cardiovascular disease events. Air pollution mixture exposure during pregnancy and postpartum psychological functioning: racial/ethnic- and fetal sex-specific associations. Prenatal ozone exposure and risk of intellectual disability. Assessment of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution: An exposure framework. Environmental public health research at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A blueprint for exposure science in a connected world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1