慢性血液透析患者的绝对血容量与长期存活率。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL International Journal of Artificial Organs Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1177/03913988241296405
Joachim Kron, Stefanie Broszeit, Til Leimbach, Susanne Kron
{"title":"慢性血液透析患者的绝对血容量与长期存活率。","authors":"Joachim Kron, Stefanie Broszeit, Til Leimbach, Susanne Kron","doi":"10.1177/03913988241296405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current online hemodiafiltration devices can be used to determine the absolute blood volume in clinical practice using the dialysate bolus method. Most of publications on this method have focused on preventing intradialytic complications. The influence of absolute blood volume on long-term prognosis has not been reported yet. A total of 79 participants in a previous study about absolute blood volume were followed for 5 years. Patients with a specific blood volume above (<i>n</i> = 45) and below 75 ml/kg (<i>n</i> = 34) respectively were compared with regard to survival using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients with a specific blood volume below 75 ml/kg had a significantly higher overall 5-year survival rate than patients above 75 ml/kg (70% vs 39%, <i>p</i> = 0.0233). In patients without cardiac dysfunction, there were no significant differences in 5-year survival between a specific blood volume below or above 75 ml/kg (66% vs 51%). A specific blood volume above 75 ml/kg was associated with an increased mortality in patients with mildly impaired left-ventricular systolic ejection fraction of 40%-59%, whereas in patients with normal blood volume this cardiac impairment did not impact mortality (22% vs 90% 5-year survival, <i>p</i> = 0.0036). This demonstrates the significance of optimum volume control for long-term survival particularly in cases of reduced cardiac function.</p>","PeriodicalId":13932,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":" ","pages":"3913988241296405"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Absolute blood volume and long-term survival in chronic hemodialysis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Joachim Kron, Stefanie Broszeit, Til Leimbach, Susanne Kron\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03913988241296405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current online hemodiafiltration devices can be used to determine the absolute blood volume in clinical practice using the dialysate bolus method. Most of publications on this method have focused on preventing intradialytic complications. The influence of absolute blood volume on long-term prognosis has not been reported yet. A total of 79 participants in a previous study about absolute blood volume were followed for 5 years. Patients with a specific blood volume above (<i>n</i> = 45) and below 75 ml/kg (<i>n</i> = 34) respectively were compared with regard to survival using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients with a specific blood volume below 75 ml/kg had a significantly higher overall 5-year survival rate than patients above 75 ml/kg (70% vs 39%, <i>p</i> = 0.0233). In patients without cardiac dysfunction, there were no significant differences in 5-year survival between a specific blood volume below or above 75 ml/kg (66% vs 51%). A specific blood volume above 75 ml/kg was associated with an increased mortality in patients with mildly impaired left-ventricular systolic ejection fraction of 40%-59%, whereas in patients with normal blood volume this cardiac impairment did not impact mortality (22% vs 90% 5-year survival, <i>p</i> = 0.0036). This demonstrates the significance of optimum volume control for long-term survival particularly in cases of reduced cardiac function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Artificial Organs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3913988241296405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Artificial Organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988241296405\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988241296405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的在线血液滤过设备可用于在临床实践中使用透析液栓塞法确定绝对血容量。关于这种方法的大多数出版物都侧重于预防析出内并发症。绝对血容量对长期预后的影响尚未见报道。在之前一项关于绝对血容量的研究中,共有 79 名参与者接受了为期 5 年的随访。采用卡普兰-米尔分析法比较了绝对血容量高于(n = 45)和低于(n = 34)75 毫升/千克的患者的存活率。血容量低于 75 毫升/千克的患者的 5 年总生存率明显高于血容量高于 75 毫升/千克的患者(70% vs 39%,P = 0.0233)。在没有心功能障碍的患者中,比血量低于或高于 75 毫升/千克的患者的 5 年存活率没有明显差异(66% 对 51%)。在左心室收缩射血分数轻度受损(40%-59%)的患者中,75 毫升/千克以上的特定血容量与死亡率升高有关,而在血容量正常的患者中,心脏功能受损不会影响死亡率(5 年生存率为 22% 对 90%,p = 0.0036)。这表明,最佳的血容量控制对长期生存具有重要意义,尤其是在心功能减退的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Absolute blood volume and long-term survival in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Current online hemodiafiltration devices can be used to determine the absolute blood volume in clinical practice using the dialysate bolus method. Most of publications on this method have focused on preventing intradialytic complications. The influence of absolute blood volume on long-term prognosis has not been reported yet. A total of 79 participants in a previous study about absolute blood volume were followed for 5 years. Patients with a specific blood volume above (n = 45) and below 75 ml/kg (n = 34) respectively were compared with regard to survival using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients with a specific blood volume below 75 ml/kg had a significantly higher overall 5-year survival rate than patients above 75 ml/kg (70% vs 39%, p = 0.0233). In patients without cardiac dysfunction, there were no significant differences in 5-year survival between a specific blood volume below or above 75 ml/kg (66% vs 51%). A specific blood volume above 75 ml/kg was associated with an increased mortality in patients with mildly impaired left-ventricular systolic ejection fraction of 40%-59%, whereas in patients with normal blood volume this cardiac impairment did not impact mortality (22% vs 90% 5-year survival, p = 0.0036). This demonstrates the significance of optimum volume control for long-term survival particularly in cases of reduced cardiac function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Artificial Organs
International Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Artificial Organs (IJAO) publishes peer-reviewed research and clinical, experimental and theoretical, contributions to the field of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs. The mission of the IJAO is to foster the development and optimization of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs, for implantation or use in procedures, to treat functional deficits of all human tissues and organs.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing ventricular assist device rotor design parameters through computational fluid dynamics and design of experiments. The Donnan equilibrium is still valid in high-volume HDF. Absolute blood volume and long-term survival in chronic hemodialysis patients. Analysis of fluid forces impacting on the impeller of a mixed flow blood pump with computational fluid dynamics. Risk factors for acute kidney injury in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1