氯胺酮对脑外伤患者的临床疗效:系统综述。

Mohammad Sameer, Duaa Al Abbas
{"title":"氯胺酮对脑外伤患者的临床疗效:系统综述。","authors":"Mohammad Sameer, Duaa Al Abbas","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_36_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current literature provides contradictory results concerning the impact of ketamine-induced anesthesia on traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the potential of ketamine boluses to influence the brain pathophysiology in TBI patients. Twenty-one studies (n = 886) were extracted from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. The primary endpoints included intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). The secondary endpoints were mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), electroencephalography (EEG), mean cerebral blood flow velocity, jugular oxygen saturation, ventilation, neurological outcomes, mortality, and overall efficacy and side-effects of ketamine-induced anesthesia. Four studies indicated a statistically significant decline in ICP in TBI patients, with ketamine sedation. Contrastingly, two studies revealed statistically significant ICP elevations, after ketamine-induced anesthesia, in TBI patients. Five studies negated any correlation between ketamine dosages and ICP changes. Three studies indicated a statistically significant increase in CPP after ketamine-induced anesthesia in TBI patients. One study revealed CPP decline after the administration of ketamine-midazolam treatment to TBI patients. Five studies revealed no noticeable influence of ketamine bolus on CPP in TBI patients. Similarly, inconsistent variations were observed in most of the secondary endpoints, including electroencephalography, neurologic outcomes, and ketamine-related side effects (all P <0.05). This systematic review emphasizes the role of ketamine-induced anesthesia in inconsistently improving or deteriorating clinical outcomes in patients with TBI. Future studies should evaluate the predominant causes (i.e., factors and attributes) of ketamine-related clinical outcomes in the TBI setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 3","pages":"160-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of ketamine in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Sameer, Duaa Al Abbas\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_36_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current literature provides contradictory results concerning the impact of ketamine-induced anesthesia on traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the potential of ketamine boluses to influence the brain pathophysiology in TBI patients. Twenty-one studies (n = 886) were extracted from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. The primary endpoints included intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). The secondary endpoints were mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), electroencephalography (EEG), mean cerebral blood flow velocity, jugular oxygen saturation, ventilation, neurological outcomes, mortality, and overall efficacy and side-effects of ketamine-induced anesthesia. Four studies indicated a statistically significant decline in ICP in TBI patients, with ketamine sedation. Contrastingly, two studies revealed statistically significant ICP elevations, after ketamine-induced anesthesia, in TBI patients. Five studies negated any correlation between ketamine dosages and ICP changes. Three studies indicated a statistically significant increase in CPP after ketamine-induced anesthesia in TBI patients. One study revealed CPP decline after the administration of ketamine-midazolam treatment to TBI patients. Five studies revealed no noticeable influence of ketamine bolus on CPP in TBI patients. Similarly, inconsistent variations were observed in most of the secondary endpoints, including electroencephalography, neurologic outcomes, and ketamine-related side effects (all P <0.05). This systematic review emphasizes the role of ketamine-induced anesthesia in inconsistently improving or deteriorating clinical outcomes in patients with TBI. Future studies should evaluate the predominant causes (i.e., factors and attributes) of ketamine-related clinical outcomes in the TBI setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"160-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540192/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_36_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_36_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于氯胺酮诱导麻醉对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)预后的影响,目前的文献提供了相互矛盾的结果。本研究旨在探讨氯胺酮栓剂对创伤性脑损伤患者大脑病理生理学的潜在影响。研究人员从 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、CINAHL 和 Cochrane Library 中提取了 21 项研究(n = 886)。主要终点包括颅内压(ICP)和脑灌注压(CPP)。次要终点包括平均动脉压 (MAP)、心率 (HR)、脑电图 (EEG)、平均脑血流速度、颈动脉血氧饱和度、通气、神经系统结果、死亡率以及氯胺酮诱导麻醉的总体疗效和副作用。有四项研究表明,氯胺酮镇静后,创伤性脑损伤患者的 ICP 有统计学意义的显著下降。相反,有两项研究显示,氯胺酮麻醉后,创伤性脑损伤患者的 ICP 有统计学意义的明显升高。五项研究否定了氯胺酮剂量与 ICP 变化之间的任何相关性。三项研究表明,在氯胺酮诱导麻醉后,创伤性脑损伤患者的 CPP 有统计学意义的增加。一项研究显示,对创伤性脑损伤患者使用氯胺酮-咪达唑仑治疗后,CPP下降。五项研究显示氯胺酮栓剂对创伤性脑损伤患者的 CPP 没有明显影响。同样,在大多数次要终点中也观察到了不一致的差异,包括脑电图、神经系统结果和氯胺酮相关副作用(所有 P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical outcomes of ketamine in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review.

The current literature provides contradictory results concerning the impact of ketamine-induced anesthesia on traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the potential of ketamine boluses to influence the brain pathophysiology in TBI patients. Twenty-one studies (n = 886) were extracted from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. The primary endpoints included intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). The secondary endpoints were mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), electroencephalography (EEG), mean cerebral blood flow velocity, jugular oxygen saturation, ventilation, neurological outcomes, mortality, and overall efficacy and side-effects of ketamine-induced anesthesia. Four studies indicated a statistically significant decline in ICP in TBI patients, with ketamine sedation. Contrastingly, two studies revealed statistically significant ICP elevations, after ketamine-induced anesthesia, in TBI patients. Five studies negated any correlation between ketamine dosages and ICP changes. Three studies indicated a statistically significant increase in CPP after ketamine-induced anesthesia in TBI patients. One study revealed CPP decline after the administration of ketamine-midazolam treatment to TBI patients. Five studies revealed no noticeable influence of ketamine bolus on CPP in TBI patients. Similarly, inconsistent variations were observed in most of the secondary endpoints, including electroencephalography, neurologic outcomes, and ketamine-related side effects (all P <0.05). This systematic review emphasizes the role of ketamine-induced anesthesia in inconsistently improving or deteriorating clinical outcomes in patients with TBI. Future studies should evaluate the predominant causes (i.e., factors and attributes) of ketamine-related clinical outcomes in the TBI setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
期刊最新文献
Effect of temperature and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass on cerebral saturation. Prospective observational study to measure the incidence of chest pain and its association with perioperative factors among parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section with subarachnoid blocks. Response to: "Before attributing basilar artery aneurysm and pericardial tamponade to leptospirosis, alternative causes must be ruled out". Assessment of quality of life in follow-up patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A prospective, observational study from a tertiary care center. Association of obesity and mortality in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1