拥抱致编辑的信:将信件类型分为分歧型、赞同型和补充型。

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JMA journal Pub Date : 2024-10-15 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI:10.31662/jmaj.2024-0053
Shigeki Matsubara
{"title":"拥抱致编辑的信:将信件类型分为分歧型、赞同型和补充型。","authors":"Shigeki Matsubara","doi":"10.31662/jmaj.2024-0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"Letters to the Editor\" that address original articles significantly contribute to medical literature. Utilizing letters published in obstetrics and gynecology journals as a study model, I aimed to classify letters according to their context, providing a valuable framework for readers to comprehend the significance of letters and for authors to effectively write them. Using a sample of 40 recent letters from the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research (JOGR), I classified letters into three main categories based on their attitude to addressed articles: Disagreement, Agreement, and Complementary. I further subclassified each category into subcategories, including \"Interpretation claim,\" \"Data addition,\" and \"Historical viewpoint.\" The same procedure was carried out for the 24 most recent letters from BJOG and the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and also for the JMA Journal. Disagreement letters were prevalent in all three OBGYN journals, accounting for 1/2 to 2/3 of all letters. The rest letters were categorized either as \"Agreement\" or \"Complimentary.\" Subcategorizations demonstrated different ratios of letters of the three categories among journals. I believe that the attempt to categorize and subcategorize letters offers valuable insights into the letters, potentially enhancing clarity in medical literature communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":73550,"journal":{"name":"JMA journal","volume":"7 4","pages":"610-614"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embracing Letters to the Editor: Classifying Types of Letters into Disagreement, Agreement, and Complementary.\",\"authors\":\"Shigeki Matsubara\",\"doi\":\"10.31662/jmaj.2024-0053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>\\\"Letters to the Editor\\\" that address original articles significantly contribute to medical literature. Utilizing letters published in obstetrics and gynecology journals as a study model, I aimed to classify letters according to their context, providing a valuable framework for readers to comprehend the significance of letters and for authors to effectively write them. Using a sample of 40 recent letters from the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research (JOGR), I classified letters into three main categories based on their attitude to addressed articles: Disagreement, Agreement, and Complementary. I further subclassified each category into subcategories, including \\\"Interpretation claim,\\\" \\\"Data addition,\\\" and \\\"Historical viewpoint.\\\" The same procedure was carried out for the 24 most recent letters from BJOG and the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and also for the JMA Journal. Disagreement letters were prevalent in all three OBGYN journals, accounting for 1/2 to 2/3 of all letters. The rest letters were categorized either as \\\"Agreement\\\" or \\\"Complimentary.\\\" Subcategorizations demonstrated different ratios of letters of the three categories among journals. I believe that the attempt to categorize and subcategorize letters offers valuable insights into the letters, potentially enhancing clarity in medical literature communication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMA journal\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"610-614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543308/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMA journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2024-0053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2024-0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对原创文章的 "致编辑的信 "为医学文献做出了重大贡献。笔者以妇产科期刊上发表的信件为研究范本,旨在根据信件的背景进行分类,为读者理解信件的意义和作者有效撰写信件提供有价值的框架。我以《妇产科研究杂志》(JOGR)最近的 40 封信件为样本,根据信件对所涉及文章的态度将信件分为三大类:不同意、同意和补充。我又将每个类别细分为 "解释主张"、"数据补充 "和 "历史观点 "等子类别。同样的程序也适用于《BJOG》和《美国妇产科杂志》以及《JMA 杂志》的 24 封最新信件。在所有三本妇产科期刊中,不同意的信件都很普遍,占所有信件的 1/2 到 2/3。其余信件被归类为 "同意 "或 "赞同"。细分后发现,不同期刊中这三类信件的比例各不相同。我认为,对信件进行分类和细分的尝试为了解信件提供了有价值的见解,有可能提高医学文献交流的清晰度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Embracing Letters to the Editor: Classifying Types of Letters into Disagreement, Agreement, and Complementary.

"Letters to the Editor" that address original articles significantly contribute to medical literature. Utilizing letters published in obstetrics and gynecology journals as a study model, I aimed to classify letters according to their context, providing a valuable framework for readers to comprehend the significance of letters and for authors to effectively write them. Using a sample of 40 recent letters from the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research (JOGR), I classified letters into three main categories based on their attitude to addressed articles: Disagreement, Agreement, and Complementary. I further subclassified each category into subcategories, including "Interpretation claim," "Data addition," and "Historical viewpoint." The same procedure was carried out for the 24 most recent letters from BJOG and the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and also for the JMA Journal. Disagreement letters were prevalent in all three OBGYN journals, accounting for 1/2 to 2/3 of all letters. The rest letters were categorized either as "Agreement" or "Complimentary." Subcategorizations demonstrated different ratios of letters of the three categories among journals. I believe that the attempt to categorize and subcategorize letters offers valuable insights into the letters, potentially enhancing clarity in medical literature communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High Prevalence of Nephrocalcinosis in Hypophosphatasia Patients with the ALPL c.1559del Gene Variant. Hospital-based Introduction of Untested High-risk Foods for Down Syndrome Infant with Severe Food Protein-induced Enterocolitis Syndrome: A Case Report. How Healthy Lifestyle Habits Have Interacted with SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccinations: A Comment. How Will Work Hour Restrictions Transform the Working Conditions of Resident Physicians? Hypotensive Dumping Syndrome in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1