女性与男性对双相抑郁发作与单相抑郁发作临床治疗的反应。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1177/02698811241292946
Ross John Baldessarini, Alessandro Miola, Gustavo Vázquez, Leonardo Tondo
{"title":"女性与男性对双相抑郁发作与单相抑郁发作临床治疗的反应。","authors":"Ross John Baldessarini, Alessandro Miola, Gustavo Vázquez, Leonardo Tondo","doi":"10.1177/02698811241292946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether responses to treatment of major depressive episodes differ between women and men or with bipolar (BD) and major depressive disorders (MDD) remains unresolved.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To test for diagnostic and sex differences in responses to treatment of depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared changes in the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS<sub>21</sub>) ratings of depression (<i>n</i> = 3243) between women (64.7%) and men, and between DSM-5-TR BD ([<i>n</i> = 253] and subtypes I [BD1] vs II [BD2]) and MDD (<i>n</i> = 2990), using bivariate comparisons and multivariate modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatments included clinically individualized use of antidepressants (by 92.4%, in doses averaging 90.0 mg/day imipramine-equivalent), sometimes with mood-stabilizing agents (32.1%), second-generation antipsychotics (18.8%), or psychotherapy (38.6%). Depression ratings decreased by 60.6% to a final mean HDRS score of 7.44; response rate (⩾50% reduction in HDRS) averaged 63.7%. Outcomes were very similar in women and men as well as with BD versus MDD, and between BD subtypes. Moreover, age, duration of illness, initial HDRS score, dose of antidepressant, and weeks of treatment, as well as sex and diagnosis were not associated with improvement of HDRS with treatment. Only 6/42 comparisons involving 21 individual HDRS items differed significantly in improvement between sexes or diagnoses. Results were very similar to the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale depression ratings. Only 2.0% of the subjects experienced mood-switching into clinical (hypo)mania and the final Young Mania Rating Scale ratings averaged 0.63.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Responses to clinical treatment (as % reduction of HDRS score, response rate, or final HDRS score) of depressed women versus men, and BD (including BD1 vs BD2) versus MDD were substantial and very similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"2698811241292946"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responses to clinical treatment of bipolar versus unipolar depressive episodes in women versus men.\",\"authors\":\"Ross John Baldessarini, Alessandro Miola, Gustavo Vázquez, Leonardo Tondo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02698811241292946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether responses to treatment of major depressive episodes differ between women and men or with bipolar (BD) and major depressive disorders (MDD) remains unresolved.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To test for diagnostic and sex differences in responses to treatment of depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared changes in the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS<sub>21</sub>) ratings of depression (<i>n</i> = 3243) between women (64.7%) and men, and between DSM-5-TR BD ([<i>n</i> = 253] and subtypes I [BD1] vs II [BD2]) and MDD (<i>n</i> = 2990), using bivariate comparisons and multivariate modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatments included clinically individualized use of antidepressants (by 92.4%, in doses averaging 90.0 mg/day imipramine-equivalent), sometimes with mood-stabilizing agents (32.1%), second-generation antipsychotics (18.8%), or psychotherapy (38.6%). Depression ratings decreased by 60.6% to a final mean HDRS score of 7.44; response rate (⩾50% reduction in HDRS) averaged 63.7%. Outcomes were very similar in women and men as well as with BD versus MDD, and between BD subtypes. Moreover, age, duration of illness, initial HDRS score, dose of antidepressant, and weeks of treatment, as well as sex and diagnosis were not associated with improvement of HDRS with treatment. Only 6/42 comparisons involving 21 individual HDRS items differed significantly in improvement between sexes or diagnoses. Results were very similar to the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale depression ratings. Only 2.0% of the subjects experienced mood-switching into clinical (hypo)mania and the final Young Mania Rating Scale ratings averaged 0.63.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Responses to clinical treatment (as % reduction of HDRS score, response rate, or final HDRS score) of depressed women versus men, and BD (including BD1 vs BD2) versus MDD were substantial and very similar.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2698811241292946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811241292946\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811241292946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重度抑郁发作的治疗反应在女性和男性之间或双相情感障碍(BD)和重度抑郁障碍(MDD)之间是否存在差异仍未得到解决:我们比较了女性(64.7%)和男性之间抑郁症 21 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS21)评分(n = 3243)的变化,以及 DSM-5-TR BD([n = 253]和亚型 I [BD1] vs II [BD2])和 MDD(n = 2990)之间的变化,使用了双变量比较和多变量建模:治疗方法包括临床个体化使用抗抑郁药(92.4%,平均剂量为 90.0 毫克/天丙咪嗪当量),有时使用情绪稳定剂(32.1%)、第二代抗精神病药(18.8%)或心理疗法(38.6%)。抑郁评分下降了 60.6%,HDRS 最终平均评分为 7.44;应答率(HDRS 下降 50%)平均为 63.7%。女性和男性、BD 和 MDD 以及 BD 亚型之间的疗效非常相似。此外,年龄、病程、HDRS初始评分、抗抑郁药剂量、治疗周数以及性别和诊断与治疗后HDRS的改善无关。在涉及 21 个 HDRS 单项的比较中,只有 6/42 项在不同性别或诊断之间的改善程度存在显著差异。结果与蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表的抑郁评级非常相似。只有 2.0% 的受试者出现了临床(低)躁狂的情绪转换,杨氏躁狂评分量表的最终评分平均为 0.63:女性抑郁症患者与男性抑郁症患者、BD(包括 BD1 与 BD2)患者与 MDD 患者对临床治疗的反应(HDRS 评分降低百分比、反应率或最终 HDRS 评分)非常明显且非常相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Responses to clinical treatment of bipolar versus unipolar depressive episodes in women versus men.

Background: Whether responses to treatment of major depressive episodes differ between women and men or with bipolar (BD) and major depressive disorders (MDD) remains unresolved.

Aims: To test for diagnostic and sex differences in responses to treatment of depression.

Methods: We compared changes in the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS21) ratings of depression (n = 3243) between women (64.7%) and men, and between DSM-5-TR BD ([n = 253] and subtypes I [BD1] vs II [BD2]) and MDD (n = 2990), using bivariate comparisons and multivariate modeling.

Results: Treatments included clinically individualized use of antidepressants (by 92.4%, in doses averaging 90.0 mg/day imipramine-equivalent), sometimes with mood-stabilizing agents (32.1%), second-generation antipsychotics (18.8%), or psychotherapy (38.6%). Depression ratings decreased by 60.6% to a final mean HDRS score of 7.44; response rate (⩾50% reduction in HDRS) averaged 63.7%. Outcomes were very similar in women and men as well as with BD versus MDD, and between BD subtypes. Moreover, age, duration of illness, initial HDRS score, dose of antidepressant, and weeks of treatment, as well as sex and diagnosis were not associated with improvement of HDRS with treatment. Only 6/42 comparisons involving 21 individual HDRS items differed significantly in improvement between sexes or diagnoses. Results were very similar to the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale depression ratings. Only 2.0% of the subjects experienced mood-switching into clinical (hypo)mania and the final Young Mania Rating Scale ratings averaged 0.63.

Conclusions: Responses to clinical treatment (as % reduction of HDRS score, response rate, or final HDRS score) of depressed women versus men, and BD (including BD1 vs BD2) versus MDD were substantial and very similar.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
期刊最新文献
High-dose Vitamin-B6 reduces sensory over-responsivity. Clinical effects of CYP2D6 phenoconversion in patients with psychosis. Influence of panic disorder and paroxetine on brain functional hubs in drug-free patients. Aspirin may be more suitable for patients with major depression: Evidence from two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. Optimizing the individual dosing of paroxetine in major depressive disorder with therapeutic drug monitoring.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1