州内和州外堕胎护理的灾难性医疗支出。

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Network Open Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44146
Ortal Wasser, Lauren J Ralph, Shelly Kaller, M Antonia Biggs
{"title":"州内和州外堕胎护理的灾难性医疗支出。","authors":"Ortal Wasser, Lauren J Ralph, Shelly Kaller, M Antonia Biggs","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Most US individuals who access abortion care pay out of pocket due to insurance coverage restrictions on abortion. More research is needed on the financial and psychological burdens of abortion seeking, particularly for those traveling across state lines for care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the proportion of patients seeking abortion who incur abortion-related catastrophic health expenditures (CHEs), assess whether CHE differs between those seeking care in state vs out of state, and examine the association of CHE with mental health symptoms.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this cross-sectional study conducted before the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, surveys were administered between January and June 2019 among individuals aged 15 to 45 years seeking abortion in 4 clinics located in abortion-supportive states (California, Illinois, and New Mexico). Participants completed self-administered questionnaires while awaiting their abortion appointment. Analyses were conducted from November 2023 to April 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Travel for abortion care, categorized as either out of state or in state based on participants' state of residence and the clinic location.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Self-reported abortion care costs and additional non-health care costs (eg, transportation, accommodation, and missed work), which were considered catastrophic if they were 40% or greater of participants' ability to pay (defined as monthly income remaining after meeting subsistence needs). Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between CHE, out-of-state travel for abortion care, and mental health symptoms including stress, anxiety, and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 675 participants included in the analytic sample, mean (SD) age was 27.33 (6.27) years; most were in their 20s (374 [55%]), and all but 196 (29%) sought abortion before or at 12 weeks' gestation. A total of 285 participants (42%) were estimated to incur abortion-related CHEs, which was associated with anxiety (APR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19) and depression (APR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.12-1.39). Of people traveling from out of state (212 [31%]), more were likely to incur CHEs (138 [65%]) compared with those seeking care in state (147 of 463 [32%]) (APR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.67-3.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cross-sectional study of US patients seeking abortion, many individuals and their households were estimated to incur CHEs, particularly those traveling from out of state. The financial and psychological burdens of abortion seeking have likely worsened after the Dobbs decision, as more people need to cross state lines to reach abortion care. The findings suggest expansion of insurance coverage to ensure equitable access to abortion care, irrespective of people's state of residence, is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2444146"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catastrophic Health Expenditures for In-State and Out-of-State Abortion Care.\",\"authors\":\"Ortal Wasser, Lauren J Ralph, Shelly Kaller, M Antonia Biggs\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Most US individuals who access abortion care pay out of pocket due to insurance coverage restrictions on abortion. More research is needed on the financial and psychological burdens of abortion seeking, particularly for those traveling across state lines for care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the proportion of patients seeking abortion who incur abortion-related catastrophic health expenditures (CHEs), assess whether CHE differs between those seeking care in state vs out of state, and examine the association of CHE with mental health symptoms.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this cross-sectional study conducted before the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, surveys were administered between January and June 2019 among individuals aged 15 to 45 years seeking abortion in 4 clinics located in abortion-supportive states (California, Illinois, and New Mexico). Participants completed self-administered questionnaires while awaiting their abortion appointment. Analyses were conducted from November 2023 to April 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Travel for abortion care, categorized as either out of state or in state based on participants' state of residence and the clinic location.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Self-reported abortion care costs and additional non-health care costs (eg, transportation, accommodation, and missed work), which were considered catastrophic if they were 40% or greater of participants' ability to pay (defined as monthly income remaining after meeting subsistence needs). Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between CHE, out-of-state travel for abortion care, and mental health symptoms including stress, anxiety, and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 675 participants included in the analytic sample, mean (SD) age was 27.33 (6.27) years; most were in their 20s (374 [55%]), and all but 196 (29%) sought abortion before or at 12 weeks' gestation. A total of 285 participants (42%) were estimated to incur abortion-related CHEs, which was associated with anxiety (APR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19) and depression (APR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.12-1.39). Of people traveling from out of state (212 [31%]), more were likely to incur CHEs (138 [65%]) compared with those seeking care in state (147 of 463 [32%]) (APR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.67-3.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cross-sectional study of US patients seeking abortion, many individuals and their households were estimated to incur CHEs, particularly those traveling from out of state. The financial and psychological burdens of abortion seeking have likely worsened after the Dobbs decision, as more people need to cross state lines to reach abortion care. The findings suggest expansion of insurance coverage to ensure equitable access to abortion care, irrespective of people's state of residence, is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"7 11\",\"pages\":\"e2444146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549660/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44146\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44146","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:由于堕胎的保险范围限制,大多数接受堕胎治疗的美国人都要自掏腰包。需要对寻求人工流产的经济和心理负担进行更多研究,尤其是对那些跨州求医的人而言:目的:估算寻求人工流产的患者中产生与人工流产相关的灾难性医疗支出(CHE)的比例,评估州内与州外就医者的CHE是否存在差异,并研究CHE与心理健康症状的关联:在这项于多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案判决前进行的横断面研究中,我们于 2019 年 1 月至 6 月期间在支持堕胎的州(加利福尼亚州、伊利诺伊州和新墨西哥州)的 4 家诊所对寻求堕胎的 15 至 45 岁的个人进行了调查。参与者在等待堕胎预约期间填写了自填问卷。主要结果和测量指标:自我报告的人工流产护理费用和额外的非医疗费用(如交通、住宿和误工),如果这些费用达到或超过参与者支付能力(指满足生存需求后的月收入剩余)的 40%,则被视为灾难性费用。研究人员进行了多变量回归分析,以检查CHE、州外流产护理旅行和心理健康症状(包括压力、焦虑和抑郁)之间的关联:在纳入分析样本的 675 名参与者中,平均(标清)年龄为 27.33 (6.27)岁;大多数为 20 多岁(374 [55%]),除 196 人(29%)外,其余均在妊娠 12 周前或 12 周时寻求堕胎。据估计,共有 285 名参与者(42%)发生了与流产相关的 CHE,这与焦虑(APR,1.13;95% CI,1.07-1.19)和抑郁(APR,1.25;95% CI,1.12-1.39)有关。与州内就医者(463 人中有 147 人[32%])相比,从州外就医者(212 人[31%])中有更多人(138 人[65%])可能患上慢性阻塞性肺病(APR,2.24;95% CI,1.67-3.00):在这项针对寻求人工流产的美国患者的横断面研究中,估计许多个人及其家庭,尤其是那些从州外前来就医的患者,都会产生经济和心理负担。多布斯案判决后,寻求堕胎的经济和心理负担可能会加重,因为更多的人需要跨越州界才能获得堕胎治疗。研究结果表明,有必要扩大保险覆盖范围,以确保无论人们居住在哪个州,都能公平地获得堕胎护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Catastrophic Health Expenditures for In-State and Out-of-State Abortion Care.

Importance: Most US individuals who access abortion care pay out of pocket due to insurance coverage restrictions on abortion. More research is needed on the financial and psychological burdens of abortion seeking, particularly for those traveling across state lines for care.

Objectives: To estimate the proportion of patients seeking abortion who incur abortion-related catastrophic health expenditures (CHEs), assess whether CHE differs between those seeking care in state vs out of state, and examine the association of CHE with mental health symptoms.

Design, setting, and participants: In this cross-sectional study conducted before the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, surveys were administered between January and June 2019 among individuals aged 15 to 45 years seeking abortion in 4 clinics located in abortion-supportive states (California, Illinois, and New Mexico). Participants completed self-administered questionnaires while awaiting their abortion appointment. Analyses were conducted from November 2023 to April 2024.

Exposure: Travel for abortion care, categorized as either out of state or in state based on participants' state of residence and the clinic location.

Main outcomes and measures: Self-reported abortion care costs and additional non-health care costs (eg, transportation, accommodation, and missed work), which were considered catastrophic if they were 40% or greater of participants' ability to pay (defined as monthly income remaining after meeting subsistence needs). Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between CHE, out-of-state travel for abortion care, and mental health symptoms including stress, anxiety, and depression.

Results: Among the 675 participants included in the analytic sample, mean (SD) age was 27.33 (6.27) years; most were in their 20s (374 [55%]), and all but 196 (29%) sought abortion before or at 12 weeks' gestation. A total of 285 participants (42%) were estimated to incur abortion-related CHEs, which was associated with anxiety (APR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19) and depression (APR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.12-1.39). Of people traveling from out of state (212 [31%]), more were likely to incur CHEs (138 [65%]) compared with those seeking care in state (147 of 463 [32%]) (APR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.67-3.00).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study of US patients seeking abortion, many individuals and their households were estimated to incur CHEs, particularly those traveling from out of state. The financial and psychological burdens of abortion seeking have likely worsened after the Dobbs decision, as more people need to cross state lines to reach abortion care. The findings suggest expansion of insurance coverage to ensure equitable access to abortion care, irrespective of people's state of residence, is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Network Open. Meal Timing Interventions for Weight Loss and Metabolic Health-What Does the Evidence Tell Us So Far? Saving Children's Lives Through Universal Pediatric Readiness Is a Wise Investment. Anemia Acuity Effect on Transfusion Strategies in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Secondary Analysis of the MINT Trial. Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1