隐藏的 "工作和失去的机会:提交给 REF2021 的护理研究和影响案例研究。

IF 1.6 Q2 NURSING Journal of Research in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-06 DOI:10.1177/17449871241261971
Bridie Kent, Parveen Ali, Barbara Farquharson, Ruth Harris, Bridget Johnston, Daniel Kelly, Hugh Mckenna, Ann McMahon, Rachel M Taylor, Michael Traynor
{"title":"隐藏的 \"工作和失去的机会:提交给 REF2021 的护理研究和影响案例研究。","authors":"Bridie Kent, Parveen Ali, Barbara Farquharson, Ruth Harris, Bridget Johnston, Daniel Kelly, Hugh Mckenna, Ann McMahon, Rachel M Taylor, Michael Traynor","doi":"10.1177/17449871241261971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>(1) Identify and characterise the nursing contribution to impact case studies submitted to Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021 across all Units of Assessment and compare this to those submitted to REF 2014; (2) Identify and characterise those impact case studies of relevance to nursing that did not include a nurse in the research team; (3) Compare the characteristics of impact case studies identified in Aim 2 with those that did include a nurse in the research team.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Desk-based analysis of REF2021 published data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the REF2021 impact database with the term nurs* then sorted case studies into categories representing the involvement of nurses on the research team. We developed variables with which to examine the impact case studies (ICSs) and make comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-fifth of ICSs involving a nurse researcher do not contribute to a visible body of 'nursing research' and is 'hidden' in other disciplines; research teams persistently fail to involve nurse researchers when researching topics of clear relevance to nurses and nursing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provide insight into two topics of importance for nursing research: reputation, and failure to benefit from transdisciplinarity.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Benefit to nurse researchers from involvement in transdisciplinary research is still limited; some nursing research remains hidden.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":"29 6","pages":"469-480"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Hidden' work and lost opportunities: nursing research and impact case studies submitted to REF2021.\",\"authors\":\"Bridie Kent, Parveen Ali, Barbara Farquharson, Ruth Harris, Bridget Johnston, Daniel Kelly, Hugh Mckenna, Ann McMahon, Rachel M Taylor, Michael Traynor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17449871241261971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>(1) Identify and characterise the nursing contribution to impact case studies submitted to Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021 across all Units of Assessment and compare this to those submitted to REF 2014; (2) Identify and characterise those impact case studies of relevance to nursing that did not include a nurse in the research team; (3) Compare the characteristics of impact case studies identified in Aim 2 with those that did include a nurse in the research team.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Desk-based analysis of REF2021 published data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the REF2021 impact database with the term nurs* then sorted case studies into categories representing the involvement of nurses on the research team. We developed variables with which to examine the impact case studies (ICSs) and make comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-fifth of ICSs involving a nurse researcher do not contribute to a visible body of 'nursing research' and is 'hidden' in other disciplines; research teams persistently fail to involve nurse researchers when researching topics of clear relevance to nurses and nursing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provide insight into two topics of importance for nursing research: reputation, and failure to benefit from transdisciplinarity.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Benefit to nurse researchers from involvement in transdisciplinary research is still limited; some nursing research remains hidden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"469-480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539177/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871241261971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871241261971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:(1) 识别并描述提交至 "卓越研究框架"(REF)2021年所有评估单元的影响案例研究中的护理贡献,并将其与提交至REF2014年的案例研究进行比较;(2) 识别并描述研究团队中未包括护士的与护理相关的影响案例研究;(3) 比较目的2中识别的影响案例研究与研究团队中包括护士的影响案例研究的特点:设计:对 REF2021 公布的数据进行案头分析:我们在 REF2021 影响数据库中搜索了 "护士 "一词*,然后将案例研究按研究团队中护士的参与情况进行了分类。我们开发了一些变量来检查影响案例研究(ICS)并进行比较:五分之一有护士研究人员参与的 ICS 没有为 "护理研究 "的显性主体做出贡献,而是 "隐藏 "在其他学科中;在研究与护士和护理明显相关的主题时,研究团队始终没有让护士研究人员参与:我们的研究结果让我们深入了解了护理研究的两个重要主题:声誉和未能从跨学科性中获益:影响:护士研究人员从参与跨学科研究中获益仍然有限;一些护理研究仍处于隐蔽状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'Hidden' work and lost opportunities: nursing research and impact case studies submitted to REF2021.

Aims: (1) Identify and characterise the nursing contribution to impact case studies submitted to Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021 across all Units of Assessment and compare this to those submitted to REF 2014; (2) Identify and characterise those impact case studies of relevance to nursing that did not include a nurse in the research team; (3) Compare the characteristics of impact case studies identified in Aim 2 with those that did include a nurse in the research team.

Design: Desk-based analysis of REF2021 published data.

Methods: We searched the REF2021 impact database with the term nurs* then sorted case studies into categories representing the involvement of nurses on the research team. We developed variables with which to examine the impact case studies (ICSs) and make comparisons.

Results: One-fifth of ICSs involving a nurse researcher do not contribute to a visible body of 'nursing research' and is 'hidden' in other disciplines; research teams persistently fail to involve nurse researchers when researching topics of clear relevance to nurses and nursing.

Conclusion: Our findings provide insight into two topics of importance for nursing research: reputation, and failure to benefit from transdisciplinarity.

Impact: Benefit to nurse researchers from involvement in transdisciplinary research is still limited; some nursing research remains hidden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
期刊最新文献
Commentary: Nurses' attitudes towards safety and their association with nurses' perceptions of adverse events and quality of care: a cross-sectional study. Commentary: Relationship between resilience, social support and psychological well-being in nursing students. Nurses' attitudes towards safety and their association with nurses' perceptions of adverse events and quality of care: a cross-sectional study. Relationship between resilience, social support and psychological well-being in nursing students. Commentary: Conceptualising nursing theory and practice within a local cultural and professional context: a methodological example to inform theory development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1