{"title":"三种意大利语干眼症问卷的心理测量特性和诊断性能：OSDI、OSDI-6 和 SPEED。","authors":"Alessio Facchin, Laura Boccardo","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Psychometric questionnaires are highly valuable instruments in clinical practice as they make subjective symptoms easier to measure. Recently, a short version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was developed, named OSDI-6.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties and compare the diagnostic criteria of three questionnaires, available in the Italian language, designed for assessing dry eye disease: Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED), OSDI-12, and specifically the new shortened version, OSDI-6.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psychometric evaluations were conducted on 250 adult participants aged 20 to 83 years. Classic and Rasch psychometric analyses were performed on the three questionnaires. The repeatability of the questionnaires was assessed by retesting 120 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exploratory factor analysis of OSDI-6 indicated saturation on two factors. Repeatability was optimal for all three questionnaires. Based on the reference OSDI-12, the cutoff for OSDI-6 was 5 points and 7 for SPEED. Rasch analysis showed that OSDI-6 and OSDI-12 present disordered response categories and thresholds. Conversely, the SPEED questionnaire shows the optimal item characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OSDI-12 is a reference questionnaire used in dry eye disease studies and clinics, but OSDI-6 does not represent a perfect shortened version, primarily for the absence of one factor measured and secondarily for the same problem of category response order and thresholds. Conversely, SPEED focusing only on symptoms showed better psychometric properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":"101 9","pages":"579-588"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties and diagnostic performance of three dry eye questionnaires in Italian: OSDI, OSDI-6, and SPEED.\",\"authors\":\"Alessio Facchin, Laura Boccardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Psychometric questionnaires are highly valuable instruments in clinical practice as they make subjective symptoms easier to measure. Recently, a short version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was developed, named OSDI-6.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties and compare the diagnostic criteria of three questionnaires, available in the Italian language, designed for assessing dry eye disease: Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED), OSDI-12, and specifically the new shortened version, OSDI-6.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psychometric evaluations were conducted on 250 adult participants aged 20 to 83 years. Classic and Rasch psychometric analyses were performed on the three questionnaires. The repeatability of the questionnaires was assessed by retesting 120 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exploratory factor analysis of OSDI-6 indicated saturation on two factors. Repeatability was optimal for all three questionnaires. Based on the reference OSDI-12, the cutoff for OSDI-6 was 5 points and 7 for SPEED. Rasch analysis showed that OSDI-6 and OSDI-12 present disordered response categories and thresholds. Conversely, the SPEED questionnaire shows the optimal item characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OSDI-12 is a reference questionnaire used in dry eye disease studies and clinics, but OSDI-6 does not represent a perfect shortened version, primarily for the absence of one factor measured and secondarily for the same problem of category response order and thresholds. Conversely, SPEED focusing only on symptoms showed better psychometric properties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"volume\":\"101 9\",\"pages\":\"579-588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002184\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychometric properties and diagnostic performance of three dry eye questionnaires in Italian: OSDI, OSDI-6, and SPEED.
Significance: Psychometric questionnaires are highly valuable instruments in clinical practice as they make subjective symptoms easier to measure. Recently, a short version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was developed, named OSDI-6.
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties and compare the diagnostic criteria of three questionnaires, available in the Italian language, designed for assessing dry eye disease: Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED), OSDI-12, and specifically the new shortened version, OSDI-6.
Methods: Psychometric evaluations were conducted on 250 adult participants aged 20 to 83 years. Classic and Rasch psychometric analyses were performed on the three questionnaires. The repeatability of the questionnaires was assessed by retesting 120 participants.
Results: The exploratory factor analysis of OSDI-6 indicated saturation on two factors. Repeatability was optimal for all three questionnaires. Based on the reference OSDI-12, the cutoff for OSDI-6 was 5 points and 7 for SPEED. Rasch analysis showed that OSDI-6 and OSDI-12 present disordered response categories and thresholds. Conversely, the SPEED questionnaire shows the optimal item characteristic curve.
Conclusions: The OSDI-12 is a reference questionnaire used in dry eye disease studies and clinics, but OSDI-6 does not represent a perfect shortened version, primarily for the absence of one factor measured and secondarily for the same problem of category response order and thresholds. Conversely, SPEED focusing only on symptoms showed better psychometric properties.
期刊介绍：
Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
