伴侣悖论:如何更好地理解夫妻共同认知能力下降?

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1177/13872877241289056
Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Claire Szapary
{"title":"伴侣悖论:如何更好地理解夫妻共同认知能力下降?","authors":"Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Claire Szapary","doi":"10.1177/13872877241289056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shared cognitive decline among spouses remains in the early stages of being understood. In this commentary, we discuss Meng et al.'s systematic review and meta-analysis, which synthesizes the evidence for concordance of cognitive decline in couples. The study's methodology is robust and brings to light the challenges that persist within this field of research, namely the lack of specificity and standardization across outcomes and long-term follow-up. Here, we also situate the findings within the broader context of the many social influences on health and underscore the importance of dyadic preventive strategies and future longitudinal and mechanistic research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"308-310"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The partner paradox: How can we better understand shared cognitive decline in couples?\",\"authors\":\"Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Claire Szapary\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877241289056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Shared cognitive decline among spouses remains in the early stages of being understood. In this commentary, we discuss Meng et al.'s systematic review and meta-analysis, which synthesizes the evidence for concordance of cognitive decline in couples. The study's methodology is robust and brings to light the challenges that persist within this field of research, namely the lack of specificity and standardization across outcomes and long-term follow-up. Here, we also situate the findings within the broader context of the many social influences on health and underscore the importance of dyadic preventive strategies and future longitudinal and mechanistic research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"308-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241289056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241289056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对配偶间共同认知能力下降的了解仍处于早期阶段。在这篇评论中,我们讨论了 Meng 等人的系统综述和荟萃分析,其中综合了夫妻认知能力下降一致性的证据。该研究的方法是强有力的,并揭示了这一研究领域一直存在的挑战,即缺乏特异性、不同结果间的标准化以及长期随访。在此,我们还将研究结果置于对健康有诸多社会影响的大背景下,并强调了夫妻预防策略和未来纵向及机制研究的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The partner paradox: How can we better understand shared cognitive decline in couples?

Shared cognitive decline among spouses remains in the early stages of being understood. In this commentary, we discuss Meng et al.'s systematic review and meta-analysis, which synthesizes the evidence for concordance of cognitive decline in couples. The study's methodology is robust and brings to light the challenges that persist within this field of research, namely the lack of specificity and standardization across outcomes and long-term follow-up. Here, we also situate the findings within the broader context of the many social influences on health and underscore the importance of dyadic preventive strategies and future longitudinal and mechanistic research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
期刊最新文献
A multi-modal and multi-stage region of interest-based fusion network convolutional neural network model to differentiate progressive mild cognitive impairment from stable mild cognitive impairment. Structural white matter connectivity differences independent of gray matter loss in mild cognitive impairment with neuropsychiatric symptoms: Early indicators of Alzheimer's disease using network-based statistics. Associations among healthy lifestyle characteristics, neuroinflammation, and cerebrospinal fluid core biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease in cognitively intact adults: The CABLE study. Investigating interleukin-8 in Alzheimer's disease: A comprehensive review. Tear fluid reflects the altered protein expressions of Alzheimer's disease patients in proteins involved in protein repair and clearance system or the regulation of cytoskeleton.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1