眼咽肌营养不良症成人饮水时间与液体浓度的差异:使用博斯特威克稠度仪和 IDDSI 流量测试方法的比较研究。

IF 2.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of texture studies Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1111/jtxs.12872
Annie Villeneuve-Rhéaume, Cynthia Gagnon, Isabelle Germain, Claudia Côté
{"title":"眼咽肌营养不良症成人饮水时间与液体浓度的差异:使用博斯特威克稠度仪和 IDDSI 流量测试方法的比较研究。","authors":"Annie Villeneuve-Rhéaume, Cynthia Gagnon, Isabelle Germain, Claudia Côté","doi":"10.1111/jtxs.12872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The main objective was to document the differences between drinking times and oral perception between liquids in individuals with dysphagia. A second objective was to assess variations in consistency categorization across instruments. A third objective was to explore the relationship between drinking time and dysphagia severity. A sample of individuals with OPMD (n = 30; 40-75 years) was recruited. Participants drank 80 mL of water, followed by three blinded commercially pre-thickened cranberry cocktails (CranA, CranB, CranC). Flow rates were measured with Bostwick consistometer, IDDSI Flow Test, and Discovery HR 20 rheometer. Patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess dysphagia. Mean drinking times for participants with OPMD were as follows: 7.9 ± 4.4 s for water, 10.7 ± 4.8 s for CranA, 12.3 ± 5.7 s for CranB, and 15.2 ± 7.2 s for CranC. All four times were statistically different from each other. Participants reported noticeable differences in oral perception. The Bostwick flow rates were different for all three cocktails. Based on IDDSI Flow Test, CranA was categorized as IDDSI level-2, while both CranB and CranC were categorized as IDDSI level-3. Correlations ranging from 0.39 to 0.55 were found between drinking times and dysphagia severity. In conclusion, liquids within the same IDDSI category can have different Bostwick flow rates and oral perception. The hypothesis that participants with OPMD may find certain liquids more challenging to swallow, despite being in the same IDDSI category, deserves further exploration in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of texture studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difference in Drinking Times as a Function of Liquid Consistency in Adults With Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy: A Comparative Study Using Bostwick Consistometer and IDDSI Flow Test Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Annie Villeneuve-Rhéaume, Cynthia Gagnon, Isabelle Germain, Claudia Côté\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jtxs.12872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The main objective was to document the differences between drinking times and oral perception between liquids in individuals with dysphagia. A second objective was to assess variations in consistency categorization across instruments. A third objective was to explore the relationship between drinking time and dysphagia severity. A sample of individuals with OPMD (n = 30; 40-75 years) was recruited. Participants drank 80 mL of water, followed by three blinded commercially pre-thickened cranberry cocktails (CranA, CranB, CranC). Flow rates were measured with Bostwick consistometer, IDDSI Flow Test, and Discovery HR 20 rheometer. Patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess dysphagia. Mean drinking times for participants with OPMD were as follows: 7.9 ± 4.4 s for water, 10.7 ± 4.8 s for CranA, 12.3 ± 5.7 s for CranB, and 15.2 ± 7.2 s for CranC. All four times were statistically different from each other. Participants reported noticeable differences in oral perception. The Bostwick flow rates were different for all three cocktails. Based on IDDSI Flow Test, CranA was categorized as IDDSI level-2, while both CranB and CranC were categorized as IDDSI level-3. Correlations ranging from 0.39 to 0.55 were found between drinking times and dysphagia severity. In conclusion, liquids within the same IDDSI category can have different Bostwick flow rates and oral perception. The hypothesis that participants with OPMD may find certain liquids more challenging to swallow, despite being in the same IDDSI category, deserves further exploration in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of texture studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of texture studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12872\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of texture studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12872","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主要目的是记录吞咽困难患者饮用液体的时间和口腔感知之间的差异。第二个目标是评估不同工具在一致性分类方面的差异。第三个目标是探索饮水时间与吞咽困难严重程度之间的关系。研究人员对患有 OPMD 的患者(n = 30;40-75 岁)进行了抽样调查。参与者先喝 80 毫升的水,然后再喝三种预先在市场上加浓的盲法蔓越莓鸡尾酒(CranA、CranB、CranC)。流速用 Bostwick 稠度仪、IDDSI 流量测试仪和 Discovery HR 20 流变仪测量。患者报告的结果测量用于评估吞咽困难。OPMD患者的平均饮水时间如下水为 7.9 ± 4.4 秒,CranA 为 10.7 ± 4.8 秒,CranB 为 12.3 ± 5.7 秒,CranC 为 15.2 ± 7.2 秒。所有四个时间在统计学上都存在差异。参与者报告了口腔感知方面的明显差异。三种鸡尾酒的博斯特威克流速均不同。根据 IDDSI 流量测试,CranA 被归类为 IDDSI 二级,而 CranB 和 CranC 均被归类为 IDDSI 三级。饮酒时间与吞咽困难严重程度之间的相关性为 0.39 至 0.55。总之,属于同一 IDDSI 类别的液体可能具有不同的博斯特威克流速和口腔感知。尽管同属 IDDSI 类别,但患有 OPMD 的参与者可能会发现某些液体更难吞咽,这一假设值得在今后的研究中进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Difference in Drinking Times as a Function of Liquid Consistency in Adults With Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy: A Comparative Study Using Bostwick Consistometer and IDDSI Flow Test Methods.

The main objective was to document the differences between drinking times and oral perception between liquids in individuals with dysphagia. A second objective was to assess variations in consistency categorization across instruments. A third objective was to explore the relationship between drinking time and dysphagia severity. A sample of individuals with OPMD (n = 30; 40-75 years) was recruited. Participants drank 80 mL of water, followed by three blinded commercially pre-thickened cranberry cocktails (CranA, CranB, CranC). Flow rates were measured with Bostwick consistometer, IDDSI Flow Test, and Discovery HR 20 rheometer. Patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess dysphagia. Mean drinking times for participants with OPMD were as follows: 7.9 ± 4.4 s for water, 10.7 ± 4.8 s for CranA, 12.3 ± 5.7 s for CranB, and 15.2 ± 7.2 s for CranC. All four times were statistically different from each other. Participants reported noticeable differences in oral perception. The Bostwick flow rates were different for all three cocktails. Based on IDDSI Flow Test, CranA was categorized as IDDSI level-2, while both CranB and CranC were categorized as IDDSI level-3. Correlations ranging from 0.39 to 0.55 were found between drinking times and dysphagia severity. In conclusion, liquids within the same IDDSI category can have different Bostwick flow rates and oral perception. The hypothesis that participants with OPMD may find certain liquids more challenging to swallow, despite being in the same IDDSI category, deserves further exploration in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of texture studies
Journal of texture studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Texture Studies is a fully peer-reviewed international journal specialized in the physics, physiology, and psychology of food oral processing, with an emphasis on the food texture and structure, sensory perception and mouth-feel, food oral behaviour, food liking and preference. The journal was first published in 1969 and has been the primary source for disseminating advances in knowledge on all of the sciences that relate to food texture. In recent years, Journal of Texture Studies has expanded its coverage to a much broader range of texture research and continues to publish high quality original and innovative experimental-based (including numerical analysis and simulation) research concerned with all aspects of eating and food preference. Journal of Texture Studies welcomes research articles, research notes, reviews, discussion papers, and communications from contributors of all relevant disciplines. Some key coverage areas/topics include (but not limited to): • Physical, mechanical, and micro-structural principles of food texture • Oral physiology • Psychology and brain responses of eating and food sensory • Food texture design and modification for specific consumers • In vitro and in vivo studies of eating and swallowing • Novel technologies and methodologies for the assessment of sensory properties • Simulation and numerical analysis of eating and swallowing
期刊最新文献
Difference in Drinking Times as a Function of Liquid Consistency in Adults With Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy: A Comparative Study Using Bostwick Consistometer and IDDSI Flow Test Methods. Psychophysical and Rheological Investigation of Toothpaste Tube Squeezability: A People-Centric Approach. Changing the Oral Tribology of Emulsions Through Crystallization of the Dispersed Triglyceride Phase Issue Information Effects of Particle Size and Shape on the Texture Property of a Solid–Liquid Dispersion System With Gel Particles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1