Annie Villeneuve-Rhéaume, Cynthia Gagnon, Isabelle Germain, Claudia Côté
{"title":"眼咽肌营养不良症成人饮水时间与液体浓度的差异:使用博斯特威克稠度仪和 IDDSI 流量测试方法的比较研究。","authors":"Annie Villeneuve-Rhéaume, Cynthia Gagnon, Isabelle Germain, Claudia Côté","doi":"10.1111/jtxs.12872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The main objective was to document the differences between drinking times and oral perception between liquids in individuals with dysphagia. A second objective was to assess variations in consistency categorization across instruments. A third objective was to explore the relationship between drinking time and dysphagia severity. A sample of individuals with OPMD (n = 30; 40-75 years) was recruited. Participants drank 80 mL of water, followed by three blinded commercially pre-thickened cranberry cocktails (CranA, CranB, CranC). Flow rates were measured with Bostwick consistometer, IDDSI Flow Test, and Discovery HR 20 rheometer. Patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess dysphagia. Mean drinking times for participants with OPMD were as follows: 7.9 ± 4.4 s for water, 10.7 ± 4.8 s for CranA, 12.3 ± 5.7 s for CranB, and 15.2 ± 7.2 s for CranC. All four times were statistically different from each other. Participants reported noticeable differences in oral perception. The Bostwick flow rates were different for all three cocktails. Based on IDDSI Flow Test, CranA was categorized as IDDSI level-2, while both CranB and CranC were categorized as IDDSI level-3. Correlations ranging from 0.39 to 0.55 were found between drinking times and dysphagia severity. In conclusion, liquids within the same IDDSI category can have different Bostwick flow rates and oral perception. The hypothesis that participants with OPMD may find certain liquids more challenging to swallow, despite being in the same IDDSI category, deserves further exploration in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of texture studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difference in Drinking Times as a Function of Liquid Consistency in Adults With Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy: A Comparative Study Using Bostwick Consistometer and IDDSI Flow Test Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Annie Villeneuve-Rhéaume, Cynthia Gagnon, Isabelle Germain, Claudia Côté\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jtxs.12872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The main objective was to document the differences between drinking times and oral perception between liquids in individuals with dysphagia. A second objective was to assess variations in consistency categorization across instruments. A third objective was to explore the relationship between drinking time and dysphagia severity. A sample of individuals with OPMD (n = 30; 40-75 years) was recruited. Participants drank 80 mL of water, followed by three blinded commercially pre-thickened cranberry cocktails (CranA, CranB, CranC). Flow rates were measured with Bostwick consistometer, IDDSI Flow Test, and Discovery HR 20 rheometer. Patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess dysphagia. Mean drinking times for participants with OPMD were as follows: 7.9 ± 4.4 s for water, 10.7 ± 4.8 s for CranA, 12.3 ± 5.7 s for CranB, and 15.2 ± 7.2 s for CranC. All four times were statistically different from each other. Participants reported noticeable differences in oral perception. The Bostwick flow rates were different for all three cocktails. Based on IDDSI Flow Test, CranA was categorized as IDDSI level-2, while both CranB and CranC were categorized as IDDSI level-3. Correlations ranging from 0.39 to 0.55 were found between drinking times and dysphagia severity. In conclusion, liquids within the same IDDSI category can have different Bostwick flow rates and oral perception. The hypothesis that participants with OPMD may find certain liquids more challenging to swallow, despite being in the same IDDSI category, deserves further exploration in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of texture studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of texture studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12872\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of texture studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12872","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Difference in Drinking Times as a Function of Liquid Consistency in Adults With Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy: A Comparative Study Using Bostwick Consistometer and IDDSI Flow Test Methods.
The main objective was to document the differences between drinking times and oral perception between liquids in individuals with dysphagia. A second objective was to assess variations in consistency categorization across instruments. A third objective was to explore the relationship between drinking time and dysphagia severity. A sample of individuals with OPMD (n = 30; 40-75 years) was recruited. Participants drank 80 mL of water, followed by three blinded commercially pre-thickened cranberry cocktails (CranA, CranB, CranC). Flow rates were measured with Bostwick consistometer, IDDSI Flow Test, and Discovery HR 20 rheometer. Patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess dysphagia. Mean drinking times for participants with OPMD were as follows: 7.9 ± 4.4 s for water, 10.7 ± 4.8 s for CranA, 12.3 ± 5.7 s for CranB, and 15.2 ± 7.2 s for CranC. All four times were statistically different from each other. Participants reported noticeable differences in oral perception. The Bostwick flow rates were different for all three cocktails. Based on IDDSI Flow Test, CranA was categorized as IDDSI level-2, while both CranB and CranC were categorized as IDDSI level-3. Correlations ranging from 0.39 to 0.55 were found between drinking times and dysphagia severity. In conclusion, liquids within the same IDDSI category can have different Bostwick flow rates and oral perception. The hypothesis that participants with OPMD may find certain liquids more challenging to swallow, despite being in the same IDDSI category, deserves further exploration in future studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Texture Studies is a fully peer-reviewed international journal specialized in the physics, physiology, and psychology of food oral processing, with an emphasis on the food texture and structure, sensory perception and mouth-feel, food oral behaviour, food liking and preference. The journal was first published in 1969 and has been the primary source for disseminating advances in knowledge on all of the sciences that relate to food texture. In recent years, Journal of Texture Studies has expanded its coverage to a much broader range of texture research and continues to publish high quality original and innovative experimental-based (including numerical analysis and simulation) research concerned with all aspects of eating and food preference.
Journal of Texture Studies welcomes research articles, research notes, reviews, discussion papers, and communications from contributors of all relevant disciplines. Some key coverage areas/topics include (but not limited to):
• Physical, mechanical, and micro-structural principles of food texture
• Oral physiology
• Psychology and brain responses of eating and food sensory
• Food texture design and modification for specific consumers
• In vitro and in vivo studies of eating and swallowing
• Novel technologies and methodologies for the assessment of sensory properties
• Simulation and numerical analysis of eating and swallowing