膝关节镜术后关节内注射糖皮质激素控制疼痛的有效性和安全性:系统综述。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05204-x
Changxu Han, Dige Gan, Chenyang Meng, Yi Qiu, Ting Hao
{"title":"膝关节镜术后关节内注射糖皮质激素控制疼痛的有效性和安全性:系统综述。","authors":"Changxu Han, Dige Gan, Chenyang Meng, Yi Qiu, Ting Hao","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05204-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pain following arthroscopic knee surgery remains a controversial clinical problem. Intra-articular (IA) glucocorticoid injections have demonstrated the potential to provide better analgesia in some orthopedic surgeries; however, due to the lack of studies, its role in knee arthroscopies remain unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular glucocorticoids after arthroscopic knee surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline, with literature search performed on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. This systematic review has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: CRD42024509749). Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials published in English comparing IA glucocorticoid to placebo in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. Risk of bias for all included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Clinical outcomes compared were pain score: visual analogue scale (VAS) or International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), time to first analgesia requirement, analgesia consumption, range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 studies (3 and 4 with evidence level I and II, respectively) involving 309 patients were included. All studies showed that IA glucocorticoids significantly decreased subjective pain scores. Three studies showed significantly longer duration to first postoperative analgesia use, while 6 showed significantly reduced postoperative analgesic administration with IA glucocorticoid use. Two studies showed significantly increased patient satisfaction with IA glucocorticoid (P = 0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively). No studies showed significant differences in complications such as nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, hypotension, or procedure-related adverse effects between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current available randomized controlled trials suggest that IA glucocorticoids can significantly reduce postoperative pain, delay, and minimize postoperative analgesia use, and improve patient satisfaction. No postoperative complications or adverse events were reported, reflecting its safety as a postoperative analgesic modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of intra-articular glucocorticoid injection for postoperative pain control after knee arthroscopy: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Changxu Han, Dige Gan, Chenyang Meng, Yi Qiu, Ting Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-024-05204-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pain following arthroscopic knee surgery remains a controversial clinical problem. Intra-articular (IA) glucocorticoid injections have demonstrated the potential to provide better analgesia in some orthopedic surgeries; however, due to the lack of studies, its role in knee arthroscopies remain unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular glucocorticoids after arthroscopic knee surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline, with literature search performed on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. This systematic review has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: CRD42024509749). Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials published in English comparing IA glucocorticoid to placebo in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. Risk of bias for all included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Clinical outcomes compared were pain score: visual analogue scale (VAS) or International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), time to first analgesia requirement, analgesia consumption, range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 studies (3 and 4 with evidence level I and II, respectively) involving 309 patients were included. All studies showed that IA glucocorticoids significantly decreased subjective pain scores. Three studies showed significantly longer duration to first postoperative analgesia use, while 6 showed significantly reduced postoperative analgesic administration with IA glucocorticoid use. Two studies showed significantly increased patient satisfaction with IA glucocorticoid (P = 0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively). No studies showed significant differences in complications such as nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, hypotension, or procedure-related adverse effects between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current available randomized controlled trials suggest that IA glucocorticoids can significantly reduce postoperative pain, delay, and minimize postoperative analgesia use, and improve patient satisfaction. No postoperative complications or adverse events were reported, reflecting its safety as a postoperative analgesic modality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05204-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05204-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:膝关节镜手术后疼痛仍是一个有争议的临床问题。在一些骨科手术中,关节腔内注射糖皮质激素有可能提供更好的镇痛效果;但由于缺乏研究,其在膝关节镜手术中的作用仍不明确。本系统综述旨在评估膝关节镜手术后关节内糖皮质激素的有效性和安全性:方法:根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了系统综述,并在 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了文献检索。本系统综述已在国际系统综述前瞻性注册中心(PROSPERO;ID:CRD42024509749)注册。纳入标准包括在接受膝关节镜检查的患者中比较IA糖皮质激素和安慰剂的英文随机对照试验。所有纳入研究的偏倚风险均采用 Cochrane 协作组织的偏倚风险工具进行评估。比较的临床结果包括疼痛评分:视觉模拟量表(VAS)或国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)、首次需要镇痛的时间、镇痛剂用量、活动范围(ROM)、患者满意度和并发症:共纳入了7项研究(3项和4项证据等级分别为I级和II级),涉及309名患者。所有研究均显示,IA 糖皮质激素能显著降低主观疼痛评分。三项研究显示首次术后镇痛的持续时间明显延长,六项研究显示使用 IA 糖皮质激素可明显减少术后镇痛用药。两项研究显示,使用 IA 糖皮质激素可明显提高患者满意度(分别为 P = 0.001 和 P = 0.01)。没有研究显示两组患者在恶心、呕吐、心动过缓、低血压等并发症或手术相关不良反应方面存在明显差异:结论:现有的随机对照试验表明,IA糖皮质激素可显著减轻术后疼痛,延迟并最大限度地减少术后镇痛的使用,提高患者满意度。没有术后并发症或不良事件的报道,反映了其作为术后镇痛方式的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of intra-articular glucocorticoid injection for postoperative pain control after knee arthroscopy: a systematic review.

Purpose: Pain following arthroscopic knee surgery remains a controversial clinical problem. Intra-articular (IA) glucocorticoid injections have demonstrated the potential to provide better analgesia in some orthopedic surgeries; however, due to the lack of studies, its role in knee arthroscopies remain unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular glucocorticoids after arthroscopic knee surgery.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline, with literature search performed on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. This systematic review has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: CRD42024509749). Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials published in English comparing IA glucocorticoid to placebo in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. Risk of bias for all included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Clinical outcomes compared were pain score: visual analogue scale (VAS) or International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), time to first analgesia requirement, analgesia consumption, range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction, and complications.

Results: A total of 7 studies (3 and 4 with evidence level I and II, respectively) involving 309 patients were included. All studies showed that IA glucocorticoids significantly decreased subjective pain scores. Three studies showed significantly longer duration to first postoperative analgesia use, while 6 showed significantly reduced postoperative analgesic administration with IA glucocorticoid use. Two studies showed significantly increased patient satisfaction with IA glucocorticoid (P = 0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively). No studies showed significant differences in complications such as nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, hypotension, or procedure-related adverse effects between the groups.

Conclusion: Current available randomized controlled trials suggest that IA glucocorticoids can significantly reduce postoperative pain, delay, and minimize postoperative analgesia use, and improve patient satisfaction. No postoperative complications or adverse events were reported, reflecting its safety as a postoperative analgesic modality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
Effect of additional free sustentaculum tali screw fixation through modified sinus tarsi approach on intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Effects of dexamethasone combined with vitamin B12 on percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy early outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. A novel personalized homogenous finite element model to predict the pull-out strength of cancellous bone screws. Factors influencing clavicular tunnel widening after single bundle coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Efficacy and safety of intra-articular glucocorticoid injection for postoperative pain control after knee arthroscopy: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1