Carl Erb, Fotis Topouzis, Hari Jayaram, Fanny Allan, Sylvie Nisslé, Francisco J Muñoz-Negrete, Ingeborg Stalmans
{"title":"用于治疗青光眼和眼压过高的新型无防腐剂比马前列素 0.01% 眼科凝胶的临床前和临床药代动力学。","authors":"Carl Erb, Fotis Topouzis, Hari Jayaram, Fanny Allan, Sylvie Nisslé, Francisco J Muñoz-Negrete, Ingeborg Stalmans","doi":"10.1089/jop.2024.0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Pharmacokinetic evaluation of ocular penetration and systemic accumulation of preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic gel (PFB 0.01% gel). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In a preclinical study, pigmented rabbits received a single ocular administration of PFB 0.01% gel (<i>N</i> = 15) or preserved bimatoprost 0.01% or 0.03% ophthalmic solution [PB 0.01% (<i>N</i> = 15) or PB 0.03% (<i>N</i> = 15)]. The aqueous humor, iris, and ciliary body were analyzed for bimatoprost+bimatoprost free acid. In a Phase 1, randomized, open-label clinical study, healthy participants received PFB 0.01% gel (<i>N</i> = 20) or PB 0.01% (<i>N</i> = 20) daily in each eye (Days 1-15). Bimatoprost levels in human plasma were analyzed on Days 1 and 15. All serological analyses used validated methods. Adverse events were collected throughout and ocular assessments were performed on Days 1 and 15. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the preclinical study, Cmax (bimatoprost+bimatoprost free acid) for PFB 0.01% gel, PB 0.01%, and PB 0.03% was 50.2, 26.3, and 59.9 ng/mL; AUC<sub>0.5-8 h</sub> was 134.0 ng·h/mL, 67.0 ng·h/mL, and 148.0 ng·h/mL. In the clinical study, systemic exposure to bimatoprost (AUC<sub>0-last</sub>) on Days 1 and 15 was lower for PFB 0.01% gel (0.5248 and 0.5645 ng·min/mL) than PB 0.01% (0.8461 and 0.7551 ng·min/mL), with no systemic accumulation of bimatoprost in either group. There were no clinically important differences between groups in ocular or systemic tolerability in the clinical study and no serious adverse events. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> PFB 0.01% gel showed improved ocular penetration compared with PB 0.01%. Systemic absorption was comparable, with a favorable clinical safety profile, supporting PFB 0.01% gel as a potential treatment for glaucoma and ocular hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":16689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacokinetics of a New Preservative-Free Bimatoprost 0.01% Ophthalmic Gel to Treat Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Carl Erb, Fotis Topouzis, Hari Jayaram, Fanny Allan, Sylvie Nisslé, Francisco J Muñoz-Negrete, Ingeborg Stalmans\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jop.2024.0092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Pharmacokinetic evaluation of ocular penetration and systemic accumulation of preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic gel (PFB 0.01% gel). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In a preclinical study, pigmented rabbits received a single ocular administration of PFB 0.01% gel (<i>N</i> = 15) or preserved bimatoprost 0.01% or 0.03% ophthalmic solution [PB 0.01% (<i>N</i> = 15) or PB 0.03% (<i>N</i> = 15)]. The aqueous humor, iris, and ciliary body were analyzed for bimatoprost+bimatoprost free acid. In a Phase 1, randomized, open-label clinical study, healthy participants received PFB 0.01% gel (<i>N</i> = 20) or PB 0.01% (<i>N</i> = 20) daily in each eye (Days 1-15). Bimatoprost levels in human plasma were analyzed on Days 1 and 15. All serological analyses used validated methods. Adverse events were collected throughout and ocular assessments were performed on Days 1 and 15. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the preclinical study, Cmax (bimatoprost+bimatoprost free acid) for PFB 0.01% gel, PB 0.01%, and PB 0.03% was 50.2, 26.3, and 59.9 ng/mL; AUC<sub>0.5-8 h</sub> was 134.0 ng·h/mL, 67.0 ng·h/mL, and 148.0 ng·h/mL. In the clinical study, systemic exposure to bimatoprost (AUC<sub>0-last</sub>) on Days 1 and 15 was lower for PFB 0.01% gel (0.5248 and 0.5645 ng·min/mL) than PB 0.01% (0.8461 and 0.7551 ng·min/mL), with no systemic accumulation of bimatoprost in either group. There were no clinically important differences between groups in ocular or systemic tolerability in the clinical study and no serious adverse events. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> PFB 0.01% gel showed improved ocular penetration compared with PB 0.01%. Systemic absorption was comparable, with a favorable clinical safety profile, supporting PFB 0.01% gel as a potential treatment for glaucoma and ocular hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2024.0092\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2024.0092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacokinetics of a New Preservative-Free Bimatoprost 0.01% Ophthalmic Gel to Treat Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.
Purpose: Pharmacokinetic evaluation of ocular penetration and systemic accumulation of preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic gel (PFB 0.01% gel). Methods: In a preclinical study, pigmented rabbits received a single ocular administration of PFB 0.01% gel (N = 15) or preserved bimatoprost 0.01% or 0.03% ophthalmic solution [PB 0.01% (N = 15) or PB 0.03% (N = 15)]. The aqueous humor, iris, and ciliary body were analyzed for bimatoprost+bimatoprost free acid. In a Phase 1, randomized, open-label clinical study, healthy participants received PFB 0.01% gel (N = 20) or PB 0.01% (N = 20) daily in each eye (Days 1-15). Bimatoprost levels in human plasma were analyzed on Days 1 and 15. All serological analyses used validated methods. Adverse events were collected throughout and ocular assessments were performed on Days 1 and 15. Results: In the preclinical study, Cmax (bimatoprost+bimatoprost free acid) for PFB 0.01% gel, PB 0.01%, and PB 0.03% was 50.2, 26.3, and 59.9 ng/mL; AUC0.5-8 h was 134.0 ng·h/mL, 67.0 ng·h/mL, and 148.0 ng·h/mL. In the clinical study, systemic exposure to bimatoprost (AUC0-last) on Days 1 and 15 was lower for PFB 0.01% gel (0.5248 and 0.5645 ng·min/mL) than PB 0.01% (0.8461 and 0.7551 ng·min/mL), with no systemic accumulation of bimatoprost in either group. There were no clinically important differences between groups in ocular or systemic tolerability in the clinical study and no serious adverse events. Conclusions: PFB 0.01% gel showed improved ocular penetration compared with PB 0.01%. Systemic absorption was comparable, with a favorable clinical safety profile, supporting PFB 0.01% gel as a potential treatment for glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal that combines the fields of ophthalmology and pharmacology to enable optimal treatment and prevention of ocular diseases and disorders. The Journal delivers the latest discoveries in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutics for the treatment of ophthalmic disorders.
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics coverage includes:
Glaucoma
Cataracts
Retinal degeneration
Ocular infection, trauma, and toxicology
Ocular drug delivery and biotransformation
Ocular pharmacotherapy/clinical trials
Ocular inflammatory and immune disorders
Gene and cell-based therapies
Ocular metabolic disorders
Ocular ischemia and blood flow
Proliferative disorders of the eye
Eyes on Drug Discovery - written by Gary D. Novack, PhD, featuring the latest updates on drug and device pipeline developments as well as policy/regulatory changes by the FDA.