患者报告结果与信息学特别小组:在农村和未得到充分服务的人群中收集患者报告的结果。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1055/a-2462-8699
Andrea L Cheville, Crystal Patil, Andrew D Boyd, Leslie Crofford, Dana Dailey, Victoria de Martelly, Guilherme Del Fiol, Miriam Ezenwa, Keturah Faurot, Mitch Knisely, Kaitlyn McLeod, Natalia Morone, Emily O'Brien, Rosa Gonzalez-Guarda, Kathleen Sluka, Karen Staman, Anne Thackeray, Christina Zigler, Judith Schlaeger
{"title":"患者报告结果与信息学特别小组:在农村和未得到充分服务的人群中收集患者报告的结果。","authors":"Andrea L Cheville, Crystal Patil, Andrew D Boyd, Leslie Crofford, Dana Dailey, Victoria de Martelly, Guilherme Del Fiol, Miriam Ezenwa, Keturah Faurot, Mitch Knisely, Kaitlyn McLeod, Natalia Morone, Emily O'Brien, Rosa Gonzalez-Guarda, Kathleen Sluka, Karen Staman, Anne Thackeray, Christina Zigler, Judith Schlaeger","doi":"10.1055/a-2462-8699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory supports the design and conduct of 31 embedded pragmatic clinical trials, and many of these trials use patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to provide valuable information about their patients' health and wellness. Often these trials enroll medically underserved patients, including people with incomes below the federal poverty threshold, racial or ethnically minoritized groups, or rural or frontier communities. In this series of trial case reports, we provide lessons learned about collecting PROMs in these populations. The unbiased collection of PROM data is critical to increase the generalizability of trial outcomes and to address health inequities. Use of electronic health records (EHRs) and other digital modes of PROM administration have gained traction. However, engagement with these modes is often low among disparities prone populations due to lessened digital proficiency, device access, and uptake of EHR portals and web interfaces. To maximize the completeness and representativeness of their trial outcome data, study teams tested a range of strategies to improve PROM response rates with emphasis on disparities prone and underserved patient groups. This manuscript describes the approaches, their implementation, and the targeted populations. Optimized PROM collection required hybrid approaches with multiple outreach modes, high-touch methods, creativity in promoting digital uptake, multi-modal participant engagement, and text messaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Section on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Informatics: Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rural and Underserved Populations.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea L Cheville, Crystal Patil, Andrew D Boyd, Leslie Crofford, Dana Dailey, Victoria de Martelly, Guilherme Del Fiol, Miriam Ezenwa, Keturah Faurot, Mitch Knisely, Kaitlyn McLeod, Natalia Morone, Emily O'Brien, Rosa Gonzalez-Guarda, Kathleen Sluka, Karen Staman, Anne Thackeray, Christina Zigler, Judith Schlaeger\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2462-8699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory supports the design and conduct of 31 embedded pragmatic clinical trials, and many of these trials use patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to provide valuable information about their patients' health and wellness. Often these trials enroll medically underserved patients, including people with incomes below the federal poverty threshold, racial or ethnically minoritized groups, or rural or frontier communities. In this series of trial case reports, we provide lessons learned about collecting PROMs in these populations. The unbiased collection of PROM data is critical to increase the generalizability of trial outcomes and to address health inequities. Use of electronic health records (EHRs) and other digital modes of PROM administration have gained traction. However, engagement with these modes is often low among disparities prone populations due to lessened digital proficiency, device access, and uptake of EHR portals and web interfaces. To maximize the completeness and representativeness of their trial outcome data, study teams tested a range of strategies to improve PROM response rates with emphasis on disparities prone and underserved patient groups. This manuscript describes the approaches, their implementation, and the targeted populations. Optimized PROM collection required hybrid approaches with multiple outreach modes, high-touch methods, creativity in promoting digital uptake, multi-modal participant engagement, and text messaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2462-8699\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2462-8699","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)实用临床试验协作组支持设计和开展 31 项嵌入式实用临床试验,其中许多试验使用患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)来提供有关患者健康和保健的宝贵信息。这些试验通常招募医疗服务不足的患者,包括收入低于联邦贫困线的人群、少数种族或民族群体、农村或边疆社区。在这一系列试验案例报告中,我们提供了在这些人群中收集 PROMs 的经验教训。无偏见地收集 PROM 数据对于提高试验结果的普遍性和解决健康不公平问题至关重要。电子健康记录 (EHR) 和其他 PROM 管理数字模式的使用已获得广泛关注。然而,由于数字技术熟练程度、设备访问能力以及对电子病历门户网站和网络接口的使用率较低,这些模式在容易产生差异的人群中的使用率通常较低。为了最大限度地提高试验结果数据的完整性和代表性,研究团队测试了一系列提高 PROM 响应率的策略,重点关注容易出现差异和服务不足的患者群体。本手稿介绍了这些方法、其实施情况以及目标人群。要优化PROM收集工作,就必须采用多种推广模式、高接触性方法、创造性地促进数字化吸收、多模式参与者参与和短信等混合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Special Section on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Informatics: Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rural and Underserved Populations.

The NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory supports the design and conduct of 31 embedded pragmatic clinical trials, and many of these trials use patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to provide valuable information about their patients' health and wellness. Often these trials enroll medically underserved patients, including people with incomes below the federal poverty threshold, racial or ethnically minoritized groups, or rural or frontier communities. In this series of trial case reports, we provide lessons learned about collecting PROMs in these populations. The unbiased collection of PROM data is critical to increase the generalizability of trial outcomes and to address health inequities. Use of electronic health records (EHRs) and other digital modes of PROM administration have gained traction. However, engagement with these modes is often low among disparities prone populations due to lessened digital proficiency, device access, and uptake of EHR portals and web interfaces. To maximize the completeness and representativeness of their trial outcome data, study teams tested a range of strategies to improve PROM response rates with emphasis on disparities prone and underserved patient groups. This manuscript describes the approaches, their implementation, and the targeted populations. Optimized PROM collection required hybrid approaches with multiple outreach modes, high-touch methods, creativity in promoting digital uptake, multi-modal participant engagement, and text messaging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Aligning Residency Note Templates with CMS Evaluation and Management Documentation Requirements. Multisite implementation of a sexual health survey and clinical decision support to promote adolescent sexually transmitted infection screening. Optimizing Resident Charge Capture with Disappearing Help Text in Note Templates. Special Section on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Informatics: Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rural and Underserved Populations. The Effect of Ambient Artificial Intelligence Notes on Provider Burnout.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1