社论:自闭症筛查工具的严格审查:呼吁解决假阴性问题。

Roald A Øien
{"title":"社论:自闭症筛查工具的严格审查:呼吁解决假阴性问题。","authors":"Roald A Øien","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study by Vivanti et al.<sup>1</sup> represents a significant contribution to research on autism screening. This cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) sought to determine whether the implementation of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F)<sup>2</sup> during routine well-child check-ups could improve the early identification and referral rates for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The trial included a diverse sample of pediatric practices, randomly assigned to either an experimental group, in which the M-CHAT-R/F was systematically implemented with high fidelity, or a control group that continued with usual care practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: The Critical Examination of Autism Screening Tools: A Call for Addressing False Negatives.\",\"authors\":\"Roald A Øien\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study by Vivanti et al.<sup>1</sup> represents a significant contribution to research on autism screening. This cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) sought to determine whether the implementation of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F)<sup>2</sup> during routine well-child check-ups could improve the early identification and referral rates for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The trial included a diverse sample of pediatric practices, randomly assigned to either an experimental group, in which the M-CHAT-R/F was systematically implemented with high fidelity, or a control group that continued with usual care practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Vivanti 等人1 的研究为自闭症筛查研究做出了重大贡献。这项分组随机对照试验(RCT)旨在确定在常规儿童健康体检中实施《幼儿自闭症随访修订核对表》(M-CHAT-R/F)2 是否能提高自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的早期识别率和转诊率。该试验包括儿科诊所的不同样本,随机分配到实验组和对照组,实验组将高保真地系统实施 M-CHAT-R/F,对照组则继续采用常规护理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial: The Critical Examination of Autism Screening Tools: A Call for Addressing False Negatives.

The study by Vivanti et al.1 represents a significant contribution to research on autism screening. This cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) sought to determine whether the implementation of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F)2 during routine well-child check-ups could improve the early identification and referral rates for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The trial included a diverse sample of pediatric practices, randomly assigned to either an experimental group, in which the M-CHAT-R/F was systematically implemented with high fidelity, or a control group that continued with usual care practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
期刊最新文献
Life Lessons From a Fishbowl. Editorial: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Related Care. Celebrating the Mental Health of Indigenous Two Spirit and Gender Diverse Youth and Adolescents in the United States. Correction. Correction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1