参照物对部分无牙颌牙弓数字种植体印模准确性的影响。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.4047/jap.2024.16.5.302
Vygandas Rutkūnas, Darius Jegelevičius, Justinas Pletkus, Liudas Auškalnis, Mykolas Akulauskas, Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu, Mutlu Özcan, Agnė Gedrimienė
{"title":"参照物对部分无牙颌牙弓数字种植体印模准确性的影响。","authors":"Vygandas Rutkūnas, Darius Jegelevičius, Justinas Pletkus, Liudas Auškalnis, Mykolas Akulauskas, Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu, Mutlu Özcan, Agnė Gedrimienė","doi":"10.4047/jap.2024.16.5.302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assesses the impact of additional reference objects (RO) on the trueness and precision of distance and angle measurements between scan bodies in digital scans with four different intraoral scanners (IOS) in partially edentulous models.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Maxilla models (Frasaco, Frasaco GmbH, Tettnang, Germany) with one (3-U) and two (4-U) missing posterior teeth were 3D printed and fitted with dental implants and scan bodies. Four intraoral scanners (Primescan (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA) (PS), Trios 3 (3Shape) (T3), Trios 4 (3Shape) (T4), and CS3600 (Carestream Dentistry) (CS)) captured digital implant impressions with and without additional RO. Scans were aligned and assessed for distance and angulation measurements between scan bodies. Statistical analyses compared trueness and precision across model groups using the Student t-test and Welch's ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CS consistently showed the highest distance values across IOS devices in both the 4-U and 3-U models (<i>P</i> < .05), both with and without RO. The distance values were not considerably affected by the presence of RO (<i>P</i> > .05), except for a few isolated cases in the PS and CS groups of 3-U models. When measuring angles, CS usually showed greater values than the other IOS devices, especially when RO was present both in the 4-U and 3-U variants (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The influence of additional reference objects on accuracy varies with different scanner types, irrespective of edentulous area length.</p>","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":"16 5","pages":"302-310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of reference objects on the accuracy of digital implant impressions in partially edentulous arches.\",\"authors\":\"Vygandas Rutkūnas, Darius Jegelevičius, Justinas Pletkus, Liudas Auškalnis, Mykolas Akulauskas, Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu, Mutlu Özcan, Agnė Gedrimienė\",\"doi\":\"10.4047/jap.2024.16.5.302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assesses the impact of additional reference objects (RO) on the trueness and precision of distance and angle measurements between scan bodies in digital scans with four different intraoral scanners (IOS) in partially edentulous models.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Maxilla models (Frasaco, Frasaco GmbH, Tettnang, Germany) with one (3-U) and two (4-U) missing posterior teeth were 3D printed and fitted with dental implants and scan bodies. Four intraoral scanners (Primescan (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA) (PS), Trios 3 (3Shape) (T3), Trios 4 (3Shape) (T4), and CS3600 (Carestream Dentistry) (CS)) captured digital implant impressions with and without additional RO. Scans were aligned and assessed for distance and angulation measurements between scan bodies. Statistical analyses compared trueness and precision across model groups using the Student t-test and Welch's ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CS consistently showed the highest distance values across IOS devices in both the 4-U and 3-U models (<i>P</i> < .05), both with and without RO. The distance values were not considerably affected by the presence of RO (<i>P</i> > .05), except for a few isolated cases in the PS and CS groups of 3-U models. When measuring angles, CS usually showed greater values than the other IOS devices, especially when RO was present both in the 4-U and 3-U variants (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The influence of additional reference objects on accuracy varies with different scanner types, irrespective of edentulous area length.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"302-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538892/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2024.16.5.302\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2024.16.5.302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了在使用四种不同的口内扫描仪(IOS)对部分缺牙模型进行数字扫描时,附加参照物(RO)对扫描体之间距离和角度测量的真实性和精确性的影响:对缺失一颗(3-U)和两颗(4-U)后牙的上颌骨模型(Frasaco, Frasaco GmbH, Tettnang, Germany)进行 3D 打印,并安装牙种植体和扫描体。四台口内扫描仪(Primescan (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA) (PS)、Trios 3 (3Shape) (T3)、Trios 4 (3Shape) (T4)和 CS3600 (Carestream Dentistry) (CS))采集了带有或不带有附加 RO 的数字种植体印模。对扫描体进行对齐,并对扫描体之间的距离和角度测量进行评估。统计分析使用学生 t 检验和韦尔奇方差分析比较了不同模型组的真实度和精确度:在 4-U 和 3-U 模型中,CS 始终是所有 IOS 设备中距离值最高的(P < .05),无论是有 RO 还是没有 RO。除了 3-U 型 PS 组和 CS 组的个别情况外,RO 的存在对距离值的影响不大(P > .05)。在测量角度时,CS 通常比其他 IOS 设备显示出更大的数值,尤其是在 4-U 和 3-U 型号中都存在 RO 时(P < .05):结论:无论无牙颌区域的长度如何,附加参照物对精确度的影响因扫描仪类型而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of reference objects on the accuracy of digital implant impressions in partially edentulous arches.

Purpose: This study assesses the impact of additional reference objects (RO) on the trueness and precision of distance and angle measurements between scan bodies in digital scans with four different intraoral scanners (IOS) in partially edentulous models.

Materials and methods: Maxilla models (Frasaco, Frasaco GmbH, Tettnang, Germany) with one (3-U) and two (4-U) missing posterior teeth were 3D printed and fitted with dental implants and scan bodies. Four intraoral scanners (Primescan (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA) (PS), Trios 3 (3Shape) (T3), Trios 4 (3Shape) (T4), and CS3600 (Carestream Dentistry) (CS)) captured digital implant impressions with and without additional RO. Scans were aligned and assessed for distance and angulation measurements between scan bodies. Statistical analyses compared trueness and precision across model groups using the Student t-test and Welch's ANOVA.

Results: CS consistently showed the highest distance values across IOS devices in both the 4-U and 3-U models (P < .05), both with and without RO. The distance values were not considerably affected by the presence of RO (P > .05), except for a few isolated cases in the PS and CS groups of 3-U models. When measuring angles, CS usually showed greater values than the other IOS devices, especially when RO was present both in the 4-U and 3-U variants (P < .05).

Conclusion: The influence of additional reference objects on accuracy varies with different scanner types, irrespective of edentulous area length.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics. This journal publishes • Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants. • Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics. • Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Effect of reference objects on the accuracy of digital implant impressions in partially edentulous arches. Impact of type and position of abutment connection on microstrain distribution: an in vitro study. Relationships between maxillofacial morphology and oral function on the habitual and non-habitual chewing sides. Success rate of all-ceramic FPDs depending on the time of restoration between 2011 and 2023. The effects of different lighting conditions on the accuracy of intraoral scanning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1